It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
And it was 38 minutes until the official alert system was able to be programmed to send the "false alarm" follow-up. Tulsi Gabbard had a tweet out there saying it was a false alarm (which she confirmed with officials) within 10 minutes, and this was being picked up by the media. Police were notified in short order as well that it was a false alarm. So pretending no action was taken for 38 minutes is just dishonest.
Timeline
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: face23785
And it was 38 minutes until the official alert system was able to be programmed to send the "false alarm" follow-up. Tulsi Gabbard had a tweet out there saying it was a false alarm (which she confirmed with officials) within 10 minutes, and this was being picked up by the media. Police were notified in short order as well that it was a false alarm. So pretending no action was taken for 38 minutes is just dishonest.
Timeline
You know full well there is nothing in the timeline that says the local news reported it was a false alarm until the system did their emergency broadcast 38 minutes later.
And there is no mention of anyone trying to send out a unique alert that it was a false alarm rather than waiting for 38 minutes to somehow issue that information via a 'cancellation.'
I think we are through discussing your beliefs and opinions. I know I am.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
PS - to the OP. It's interesting to note that you have prime deep state agents here in the thread, telling us in no uncertain terms that this was a government test. (Any time that they show up & try to make you feel stupid while telling everyone else there's "...nothing to see here" - you know it was a government test...)
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
PS - to the OP. It's interesting to note that you have prime deep state agents here in the thread, telling us in no uncertain terms that this was a government test. (Any time that they show up & try to make you feel stupid while telling everyone else there's "...nothing to see here" - you know it was a government test...)
There are some 'usual suspects,' that's for sure.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
PS - to the OP. It's interesting to note that you have prime deep state agents here in the thread, telling us in no uncertain terms that this was a government test. (Any time that they show up & try to make you feel stupid while telling everyone else there's "...nothing to see here" - you know it was a government test...)
There are some 'usual suspects,' that's for sure.
I guess that local government employees, according to you, cannot make any mistakes, and are infallible! Wow, talk about cognitive disconnection to reality.
Let me ask you, have you ever, or do you know anyone, that has accidentally deleted a file on a computer by mindlessly through the "Are you sure" dialog? Only to realize, ooops, I didn't want to do that.
That is what this was, simple as that. They had a multi-check system in place, but assigned it to a SINGLE PERSON to decide. All this also was done at the shift-change timeframe. So, the person that sent out the alert, LEFT, and the next person on the shift like;y didn't know it was sent in error.
Which sounds more likely?
A) The government is so organized and infallible that they can plan and perpetrate a false alarm like this, without anyone blowing the whistle after the fact (I've not seen anyone in government making these claims at all have you?)
B) Low paid and ill trained government employee tasked with testing the alarm system clicks the active alert button mistakenly, then quickly clicks through the confirmation dialog since the end of shift is here, and (s)he needs to leave to get to that party.
Honestly, which seems more likely?
Incredible government organization and planning at multiple levels and including numerous devoted people, or a single untrained and low-paid government employee looking to get that last task done befre going home for the day.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
PS - to the OP. It's interesting to note that you have prime deep state agents here in the thread, telling us in no uncertain terms that this was a government test. (Any time that they show up & try to make you feel stupid while telling everyone else there's "...nothing to see here" - you know it was a government test...)
There are some 'usual suspects,' that's for sure.
I guess that local government employees, according to you, cannot make any mistakes, and are infallible!
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
PS - to the OP. It's interesting to note that you have prime deep state agents here in the thread, telling us in no uncertain terms that this was a government test. (Any time that they show up & try to make you feel stupid while telling everyone else there's "...nothing to see here" - you know it was a government test...)
There are some 'usual suspects,' that's for sure.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
PS - to the OP. It's interesting to note that you have prime deep state agents here in the thread, telling us in no uncertain terms that this was a government test. (Any time that they show up & try to make you feel stupid while telling everyone else there's "...nothing to see here" - you know it was a government test...)
There are some 'usual suspects,' that's for sure.
I guess that local government employees, according to you, cannot make any mistakes, and are infallible!
Yes. That's what I am saying.
*huge eyeroll*
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Krakatoa
When you try to 'logic' it's so cute!
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Krakatoa
Awww..well, I still think you are totes adorbs when you try to talk about 'truth' and how it only exists in your mind.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Krakatoa
Awww..well, I still think you are totes adorbs when you try to talk about 'truth' and how it only exists in your mind.
And yet, you have not disagreed with my statements that sometimes a simple mistake is a simple mistake.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Krakatoa
Awww..well, I still think you are totes adorbs when you try to talk about 'truth' and how it only exists in your mind.
And yet, you have not disagreed with my statements that sometimes a simple mistake is a simple mistake.
You 'attacked' me first when you suggested that I think the government is infallible based purely on this instance where I don't think what happened in Hawaii was unintentional.
Since I never suggested I believe such a thing, why on earth should I even respond to you?
That illogical leap you made is so tortured, it wasn't worth my time responding to seriously.
Of course I know people in government and the systems they use are fallible. I just don't believe THIS was a "simple mistake."
Moving on.
originally posted by: skepticalguy
I'm actually surprised things like this don't happen more often.