It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
And I don’t want to hear the usual…
F___ THE COPS. I AINT KISSING NO COPS ASS. I HAVE RIGHTS.
That kind of attitude can get you killed like this poor young man.
** GRAPHIC - VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED LINKS BELOW - SPLIT SECOND DECISIONS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES**
* - www.youtube.com...** GRAPHIC - VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED LINKS ABOVE - SPLIT SECOND DECISIONS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES**
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: purplemer
You cant claim he was not a threat. At the time he was considered armed.
You did not know he was unarmed until the media reported it - after the fact.
Also I am not giving you / making an excuse. I am giving you the facts.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: purplemer
You cant claim he was not a threat. At the time he was considered armed.
You did not know he was unarmed until the media reported it - after the fact.
Also I am not giving you / making an excuse. I am giving you the facts.
originally posted by: purplemer
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: purplemer
You cant claim he was not a threat. At the time he was considered armed.
You did not know he was unarmed until the media reported it - after the fact.
Also I am not giving you / making an excuse. I am giving you the facts.
You think the police should have the right to execute any reported threat. Get over yourself. If you support state murder you are no better.
originally posted by: keenmachine
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: purplemer
You cant claim he was not a threat. At the time he was considered armed.
You did not know he was unarmed until the media reported it - after the fact.
Also I am not giving you / making an excuse. I am giving you the facts.
Then answer me a question, why was he not checked for weapons while on the ground and not moving? The cop already knew that this guy was messing up, begging not to be shot, crying and possibly intoxicated. Why make him cross his legs, put up his arms and crawl and tell him that if falls he better fall on his face? Under these circumstances I know alot of people who would have freaked being told they were gonna be shot with any wrong move.Why have this dance and allow a cop with this type of attitude and You're fuc@ked inscripted on his gun, to gun down a man who has trouble with instructions under extreme pressure. What point in this video did you think this guy crying, begging for his life is gonna go for a gun?
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: Xcathdra
Yet again you defend the indefensible.
Can I ask what needs to be required for you to admit that a police officer made a massive error and must be held accountable? Because you keep defending people who have overreacted to threats that don't exist.
Once again, you make me afraid to go to the USA. You really do, I am not exaggerating this, you make me doubt the judgement of US law enforcement officers.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: face23785
The lesson here is, if you can't be relied upon to never shoot an unarmed man no matter what he is up to, you probably should not be permitted to carry a gun as part of your profession. If you are more willing to kill an innocent, than risk getting shot to protect one, maybe enforcement of the law and public service are not for you?