It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pedestrians may not suddenly leave the curb and enter a crosswalk into the path of a moving vehicle that is so close the vehicle is unable to yield.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Wardaddy454
He give plenty of notice of his intentions
Move or get run over?
They (quite literally) run up on him.
After the 'driver' drove right up to them, blaring his horn...
They already occupied the street before driver approached aggressively and forced a confrontation., derp
try to watch the video without that red haze of anger.
Watch it again without your bias I mentioned earlier.
Wait, you drive a tank in the Generals rank, right?
nvm
That's fine. But these people instigated by appraching the car instead of letting it pass, irregardless of the legality of his crossing into opposing lanes.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Wardaddy454
That's fine. But these people instigated by appraching the car instead of letting it pass, irregardless of the legality of his crossing into opposing lanes.
Yah, his intentions were clear, move or get run over. Tilt
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: butcherguy
Pedestrians may not suddenly leave the curb and enter a crosswalk into the path of a moving vehicle that is so close the vehicle is unable to yield.
They were already in the street, in fact I could hardly see the car for all the 'pedestrians', blocking the road.
Now show me the law that says its okay to drive thru cross walks with people already in them, ever.
And he was "blaring" his horn because they moved to get into his way right? Because again, he was gonna go around them.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Wardaddy454
And he was "blaring" his horn because they moved to get into his way right? Because again, he was gonna go around them.
No, horn blaring is apparent in the video while driver was still away from the crowded crosswalk. You can hear the horn blare, then see the headlights approach, then see the demonstrators react.
1,2,3, side retired.
This is academic, had my say... thanks for the legal dispute.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Teikiatsu
If you think that my stance on the driver is a defense for the protesters you are incorrect. It is not.
And no, I was not there. But I do deal with the privilege of driving every day and I know that what he did was not in accordance with the laws governing that privilege.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: intrptr
Exactly.
It wasn't like these protesters were in the middle of a freeway and the driver had no where to go. He could have turned at the light one block back. He could have busted a u-turn.
Hell, he could have driven up and asked what they were protesting an they probably would have cleared a path.
Instead he drove at an unsafe rate directly into the crowd laying on his horn. Because right-wing programming is now, that if you're in your car and you drive into a crowd of protesters, it's okay to run them over.
Did you see how excited people were getting when they thought they could shoot people dead for vandalizing a statue?
I recall one of these events talked about here several years ago. A protest in the streets, but that time the video was much better. The driver used his car like a mobile snow shovel to clear a path through the pedestrians. Like a weapon. From what I recall, that thread flowed much like this one with many conservatives giving the thumbs up to the actions of the driver because the people were evil lefties.
No, its because we know that there will be at least one person in the crowd willing to escalate things. Then herd mentality kicks in.
And true as that may be it still does not circumvent the responsibilities agreed to by receiving a drivers license. When approaching a hindrance to the flow of traffic, pull over and proceed with caution when safe. If we want to argue the point that maybe the driver did not see them ahead of time, then maybe your point would be more viable. But chances are the driver saw the congestion well in advance and did not adhere to those simple rules of driving. Or I might add, simple rules of self preservation.
And what then of the crimes committed by these "pedestrians"?
Pedestrian interference, Assault, Disorderly conduct.
Without a permit, drivers have more rights than random people blocking a street.
The ''crimes'' of the pedestrians should have been handled in the correct manner. He should have pulled over prior to the hinderence, pulled out his cell phone (did he have one? chances are good that he did) and called 911 to report the crimes that were happening. But he did not. He then broke the law himself by driving into the mob.
Even though they did not have a permit, this driver did not have more rights than the people in the street. His rights were limited to the license and the privilege he was granted to drive a motor vehicle.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: shooterbrody
I have many years of experience driving down roads and seeing when streets are filled with people before I am actually among them. And yes, I have seen streets filled with people.
Maybe the person had no other means of egress and just wanted to get out of a chaotic and dangerous situation. I can imagine a situation where a protest develops while you are in a place of business, either working or shopping, and you leave the place to find that you have no clear route to get out.
And what happens if you come across a street that is totally flooded or there is a huge sinkhole, or there is a bad traffic accident covering the road? Just try to drive on through anyway? Anyone who does that is stupid.
None of those scenarios are pounding on your car/windshield or trying to open your doors.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Teikiatsu
But if you continue to go down a street that's flooded, your car will be swept away and you may drown. If you continue to down a street that is covered by a humongous sinkhole, you will fall in and crash.
If you continue to go down a street with angry protesters, there are consequences to that as well.
Consequences for who Kayluv? Innocent bystanders some how get what they deserve? Collateral Damage? Perhaps protestors shouldn't violently protest in the streets. The consequences of that is bad things happen to them and innocent bystanders. Simply driving down a street and getting attacked by said violent protestors is not even close in equivalency.