It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ameilia
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
What an idiotic generalization. The author claims anyone Christian and white is a racist.... Looks like HE is the racist one.
originally posted by: Tiger5
a reply to: ketsuko
Thanks for the Bain Joke. lol
Actually brain scanning only builds on the work of almost 100 year of neuropathology. It is a recognised science as opposed to pseudoscience. You do not understand the level of modern peer review especially in novel or controversial areas of research findings.
Your capacity intellectual gymnastics does you credit. Are you a fundamentalist?
So the idea that particular brain regions are involved in particular cognitive functions can be a statistical fluke. The results that Ethan Kross and his colleagues obtained at the University of Michigan add another dimension to the problem. They showed that the brain can't tell the difference between emotional and physical pain as it turned out that same brain regions light up whether you're burned by hot coffee or you think about an unwanted break-up. This creates a problem: it certainly suggest the possibility of what’s called reverse inference. Even if there is a very good correlation between a particular cognitive task and a brain pattern, we can't possibly conclude that when the particular brain pattern in question is observed, the very same correlated task must be happening. Furthermore, another dilemma that always haunts correlational research such as fMRI is that because two things occur at the same time does not prove that one thing causes the other. This is one of the old clichés but also traditional tenets of science that correlation is not causation.
originally posted by: pyramid head
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: pyramid head
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
I was on topic, and replying to your thread. If your going to start a thread labeling a group of people from a position of arrogance, expect people to challenge you on your opinion.
Not being able to defend your opinion doesn't mean I'm "pushing buttons".
Sorry if you are seeing any arrogance from me. That is not what this thread is all about. It is about perception and conversation, and...
Of course it seems that way to you. You have no idea of the concept of freedom. You don't even have the basic right of free speech. Your in a cage telling someone on the outside how great the inside of your cage is. You can keep your "educated" lack of freedoms granted by inbred pedophile kings and queens in england. We'll continue to "enthusiastically vote against our own interest"(freedom). - White Christian God King Worshipper
...has got Jack # to do with it. In the words of the Prophet, of course.
It is, and your being disingenuous. Your labeling a group of people that you ideologically disagree with as less intelligent.
Now you don't want defend your position anymore. That's fine, just don't make it like I'm somehow off base.
originally posted by: Ameilia
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
What an idiotic generalization. The author claims anyone Christian and white is a racist.... Looks like HE is the racist one.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Aazadan
I still have a very hard time believing that. For one thing, someone that religious is unlikely to be a hard core gamer because the themes of most games are going to be against their religion. How did they become gamers?
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: Ameilia
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
What an idiotic generalization. The author claims anyone Christian and white is a racist.... Looks like HE is the racist one.
Not exactly. Not here at any rate. Although, I suspect that his personal opinion is rather in line with your own generalization.
What he's saying is that most people that are white, (this next bit is important) fundamentalist christian and (even more important) rural are probably racist. In my experience, which is my whole life, literally, lived this from my first breath, he's right. There is some nuance, but more or less, he's correct. That Children of Canaan thing still has prevalence in the collective psyche/culture/consciousness/what have you.
Also, rural America is often geographically isolated and we maintain the same value system as our grandparents or even great grandparents or even further back. These are, in spite of the internet, pocket populations, that are culturally stable on one hand but stagnant on the other. My husband, from California, has always teased me for speaking and even acting like an 90 year old woman.
What he doesn't get into in the article is that these pocket populations are rejected by the broader culture, which causes them to seek stability in that cultural identity and sense of shared community. In fact, they double down and maintain some values that are incompatible or even antithetical to mainstream, especially values that the most tangibly reinforce that sense of identity, like, race for example. Although, I will say that the ridicule and rejection is exactly what he is perpetuating with his condescending tone.
Another problem with rural Christian white Americans is they are racists.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
I'm not sure about that. I was raised in a very rural part of one of the US' most rural states: New Mexico. I now reside in the most rural state in the US: Alaska. I do fairly well for myself and there are plenty of opportunities for my kids to do the same. The advantage of living where I do is that, if my profession (engineering) ever goes heels to Jesus, there are plenty of alternative ways of making a living available to me. Fishing, mining, logging, oil fields, subsistence living... it's all there. Not real sure people in America's more urbanized regions can do that. Certainly the subsistence living isn't a viable option for any of them without a very healthy dose of welfare assistance.
The bottom line is that there are a lot of Americans who simply want to be left alone when they want to be left alone. I can do that with a chunk of land and a cabin miles off the road system that requires a boat in the summer or a snow machine in the winter to get to... how does someone living in a tenament building in NYC do that?
originally posted by: Grambler
Lets go through his bullet points at the end.
- Their economic situation is largely the result of voting for supply-side economic policies that have been the largest redistribution of wealth from the bottom/middle to the top in U.S. history.
No they are poor because people on both parties have worked with the federal reserve to enact economic policies that benefited the wealthy banks and their globalist agenda. As a result jobs are disappearing and wages are stagnate. Obama was instrumental in helping these bankers
- Immigrants haven’t taken their jobs. If all immigrants, legal or otherwise, were removed from the U.S., our economy would come to a screeching halt and food prices would soar.
Wrong. Immigrants directly compete with low skill labor like in these rural areas. And I made an article on the racism of statement like this, that say we should have basically indentured servant illegals work for next to nothing to keep food prices down. Who would have thought, this educated liberal wanting his life to be easier off of the back of illegals.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
- Immigrants are not responsible for companies moving their plants overseas. The almost exclusively white business owners are responsible, because they care more about their shareholders (who are also mostly white) than about American workers.
True. And who was pushing the TPP that would have made this worse. Who did Nafta? Oh yes, democrats.
- No one is coming for their guns. All that has been proposed during the entire Obama administration is having better background checks.
The liberals will never be satisfied until gun ownership is nearly impossible. Here is my thread on Obamas gun town hall.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
- Gay people getting married is not a threat to their freedom to believe in whatever white god they want to. No one is going to make their church marry gays, have a gay pastor or accept gays for membership.
True. I am for gay marriage. I live in a rural area, no one really cares about gay marriage. But gay people going outrage shopping to find a bakery that wouldn't serve them is an outrage. And this author had to throw in "white" god. he sounds like a racist.
- Women having access to birth control doesn’t affect their lives either, especially women they complain about being teenage single mothers.
No one i know is against birth control. They are against abortion.
- Blacks are not “lazy moochers living off their hard-earned tax dollars” any more than many of their fellow rural neighbors. People in need are people in need. People who can’t find jobs because of their circumstances, a changing economy or outsourcing overseas belong to all races.
First this is true. But how big of this guy to speak of equality after he got done calling all rural white conservatives as dumb racist. So his point is someone labels blacks moochers = racist, someone lablels rural whites dumb and racist = educated opinion.
- They get a tremendous amount of help from the government they complain does nothing for them. From the roads and utility grids they use to farm subsidies, crop insurance and commodities protections, they benefit greatly from government assistance. The Farm Bill is one of the largest financial expenditures by the U.S. government. Without government assistance, their lives would be considerably worse.
Of course the government helps and hurts all of us. So what, these people who are losing jobs and their homes should praise the government for the crumbs they are given?
- They get the largest share of Food Stamps, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security.
Yep. Because government policies from people like Obama have devestated them. And knowing this level of poverty exists in these areas, why are they ignored by politicians? And why is crime not as bad as in urban areas? I mean, they are all just uneducated racists, so you would expect huge levels of violent crime.
-They complain about globalization, yet line up like everyone else to get the latest Apple products. They have no problem buying foreign-made guns, scopes and hunting equipment. They don’t think twice about driving trucks whose engines were made in Canada, tires made in Japan, radios made in Korea, and computer parts made in Malaysia.
Trade among countries is different than globalization. So what is the argument here? Like your I-phone? Well then submit ti international control! You must now make room for any number of refugees we want.
- They use illicit drugs as much as any other group. But when other people do it is a “moral failing” and they should be severely punished, legally. When they do it, it is a “health crisis” that needs sympathy and attention.
Like this author is discussing the moral failing of poor white people? And if its such a huge problem (which it is) why is it largely ignored well urban problems are constantly focused on? And why is crime so much lower than in other drug infected communities?
- When jobs dry up for whatever reason, they refuse to relocate but lecture the poor in places like Flint for staying in failing towns.
I don't ever here rural people telling urban people to move. I think this author is projecting. So what is this, is the author saying that these poor rural people deserve to be poor as revenge for supposed dumb things they say? What an ass.
-They are quick to judge minorities for being “welfare moochers,” but don’t think twice about cashing their welfare checks every month.
Ironically this whole article is asserting poor whites are welfare moochers and more. But I guess it ok for this guy to do it because he is an educated liberal. But yes, many rural people do say stuff like this. And many urban people speak of rural people in contempt. GThis has a lot to do with the identity politics like this article is preaching.
- They complain about coastal liberals, but taxes from California and New York cover their farm subsidies, help maintain their highways and keep the hospitals in their sparsely populated rural areas open for business.
And yet the work that these dumb people do is what makes the elites way of life possible. By the way, these people are so poor but again this wealthy liberal thinks they should be thankful for the crumbs they are given. And he conveintly leaves out how coastal liberals speak of fly over country and the deplorables that live their with such contempt.
continued below
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
I'm close enough to the locals to hear the joke:
originally posted by: generik
a reply to: D8Tee
not any that i have ever known. relatives of mine have recently stopped farming. they were getting too old and their kids all were not willing to do the hard work, for the low pay, ie barely making ends meet. i hear the same story from farming families i know both in the US and Canada. i don't know any of the rich land baron/factory farmers.
Q - How do you define child abuse in the country?
A - Leaving the farm to the kids.
The average net operating income in 2015 is forecast to be $77,287.
The average net worth per farm is expected to reach $2.7 million this year.
I've also experienced the boreal forest of northern Alberta for a couple of seasons so I have an inkling of your world...though just an inkling.
Funny how i took the time to go through every bullet pint in this article, and all of the people defending it have not one comment on it. Just ignore it,