It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Look at the Second World War. If people never knew it had happened, how long do you think it would be before it, or something just like it, but for the names of the players and the ethnicity of the victims, happened again? You think a long time?
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Annee
One cannot 'modernize' classics. That is censorship. "To Kill a Mockingbird" is taught to 9th graders, normally, and the context of different words is part of the lesson plan.
I am surprised that anyone would think think this is a good idea of any kind.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Annee
What about Jane Austin? You know, how women were married off with very little say, their inheritance entailed to male heirs, etc? Does that offend you? What about Song of Ice and Fire? Too much sex and violence? What about Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas? Too much drugs?
When you start building bonfires, you just never know what will get thrown in.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Look at the Second World War. If people never knew it had happened, how long do you think it would be before it, or something just like it, but for the names of the players and the ethnicity of the victims, happened again? You think a long time?
I think we should censor that too, along with all other history of war.
originally posted by: Annee
Fiction vs non-Fiction.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Annee
Fiction vs non-Fiction.
If you actually understood Twain's writing, which you obviously have minimal to no grasp on, you would recognize that, as a satirist, he used the prism of fiction to expose the hypercritical and unseemly realities of his time in an attempt to educate the reader on these injustices.
originally posted by: Annee
You can choose the past if that's your thing.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Look at the Second World War. If people never knew it had happened, how long do you think it would be before it, or something just like it, but for the names of the players and the ethnicity of the victims, happened again? You think a long time?
I think we should censor that too, along with all other history of war.
People could get offended that people killed other people and the last thing we want is for these young, impressionable minds to think that violence occurs on our planet. They should be spared this awful reality and instead be taught that a wonderful pink unicorn named Larry will ride into their lives and transport them to a future of Utopian delights where mean people are just a figment of their overly-protective parent's imaginations.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: JanAmosComenius
It would be like editing the end of Romeo and Juliet to stop kids getting addicted to Emo music!
Ridiculous!
Great example!
originally posted by: JanAmosComenius
a reply to: Annee
You are surfing the tide? In your age and with your experience? What are you doing on conspiracy forum?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Annee
You will note that in both stories however, the horror of tribalism is never shied away from, but dealt with firmly and uncompromisingly by the respective plays.