It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: introvert
That's odd. The Catholic church down the road from me feeds the poor every Tuesday and Saturday with soups and bread rolls.
Does that mean Catholics support bread lines and Communism, or do they believe in helping those in need?
Context is key.
The Catholic Church and Catholic Charities are not government programs.
Maybe that's why they are successful.
Oh, but they most certainly used to be until quite recently in history. The Pope and Vatican wielded extraordinary power over the monarchs of Europe for centuries...
You could call them the real power behind the power. The government behind the government.
"Livable Wage"? Based on a whole LOT of CAPITALISM and private sector growth. Especially Denmark, Sweden, Norway. Very wealthy nations with low cost, sparse population, no Illegal Immigration in high numbers (Save Sweden in some part), independent, intelligent....and industries that PAY.
"Closing Gap On Wealth inequality" = Sanders cannot do it with a pen, and he would be up against an entrie Republican Congress that already thinks he's nuts, even many Dems do,
"Racial Justice"? That term has ZERO value in the real world
originally posted by: DBCowboy
But socialism created the condition where people are starving and people applaud socialism for providing limited supplies so people don't die due to socialism.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mOjOm
But socialism created the condition where people are starving and people applaud socialism for providing limited supplies so people don't die due to socialism.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
So your saying eliminating food stamps would make the poor less hungry?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Removing the nanny-state would put the responsibility of feeding oneself back onto the individual.
Not the state.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mOjOm
But there are some societies, like socialism, that control the means of production and deliberately starve the people.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: DBCowboy
That might make some kind of sense if a capitalist system could provide enough decent paying jobs to the entire population. But it can't, so your assumption is wrong and actually borderline delusional... in the politest way possible, of course.