It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
a reply to: akushla99
I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt at first, but now I am convinced that you are mainly here to try and get people riled up. You want to want a confrontational argument, not an intelligent debate.
Good luck with your endeavours...
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: akushla99
Free will is making the long-term decision at 19yo to get a job while studying, to earn the money, to get into a prestigious university, to research the concept that we don't have free will - get it?
No, I don’t get it. Please explain.
Not that I think you can.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: akushla99
Free will is making the long-term decision at 19yo to get a job while studying, to earn the money, to get into a prestigious university, to research the concept that we don't have free will - get it?
No, I don’t get it. Please explain.
Not that I think you can.
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
a reply to: akushla99
Since I am in a patient mood, I thought I would try reason with you.
You mistake determinism with omniscience, they are not the same. Furthermore, you are overlooking a key argument made by those who support the determinism approach: people are not consciously aware of the fact that they lack Free Will. It really does appear as though we do maintain Free Will, and we are conditioned by society, religion and the media to believe this is the case.
originally posted by: nOraKat
I don't think you need neuro-science to answer this question.
If you observe your own decisions, you can observe that all of your decisions were due to conditions -that is, it was due to such and such reason(s). It is observable.
Or maybe there can be random factors that effected a decison..
Whether a decision was decided by random factors or whether it was conditioned, that is not free will is it?
What other things can exit that effect a decision?
originally posted by: akushla99
Of all the quadrillion choices you could be making right now at the nexus between what has happened, and what could happen - what percentage of this unknown number of choices available to you, do you think you could or should be aware of?
originally posted by: akushla99
originally posted by: Restricted
Anyone who's ever been psychotic knows there is no such thing as free will.
Those who believe there is free will are still asleep.
...then those who think(?) they don't have free will are psychotic...
Å99
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: ScrappyJ
past is set in stone, future is not
opens your mind to the truth. You see things from wildly different perspectives, and the truth of our existence is shocking.
when we are nothing more than chemical and biological reactions ..
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: akushla99
Quod erat demonstrandum. Your servant, sir.
I'm not claiming to have any either.
originally posted by: Restricted
originally posted by: akushla99
originally posted by: Restricted
Anyone who's ever been psychotic knows there is no such thing as free will.
Those who believe there is free will are still asleep.
...then those who think(?) they don't have free will are psychotic...
Å99
No. All I'm saying is that psychosis, like illegal drugs, opens your mind to the truth. You see things from wildly different perspectives, and the truth of our existence is shocking.