It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
I would argue it's not much a privilege to have genitalia on the outside of the body.
These same people think they should be able to say whatever hateful/hurtful things they want without repercussion -- and that the people it offends need to "toughen up".
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
It seems the "it makes me uncomfortable" people are also the people that complain about PC folks. These same people think they should be able to say whatever hateful/hurtful things they want without repercussion -- and that the people it offends need to "toughen up". Yet these same people also claim that it's OK for them to be made uncomfortable in a locker room?
I see a double standard here developing...
I would agree with you if you can point me in the direction of anyone ever who was a male and identified as a female, and then woke up one day and was now magically a female.
Several medical conditions can result in a natural sex change in humans, where the appearance at birth is somewhat, mostly, or completely of one sex, but changes over the course of a lifetime to being somewhat, mostly or completely of the other sex.
The overwhelming majority of natural sex changes are from a female appearance at birth to a male appearance after puberty, due to either 5-alpha-reductase deficiency (5alpha-RD-2) or 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency (17beta-HSD-3).[5][6] A relative handful of male to female changes have been reported, and the etiologies of these are not well understood.[7][8]
Maybe so but it's the rest of what they're attached to I'm talking about and what comes with being male in our society which it's hard to argue in our culture anyway, doesn't come with certain a certain built-in privilege.
But not inaccurate. It's true. Between skeletal structure and DNA, that's where they'll put him absent any other clues. There simply is no other way for them to know.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
It seems the "it makes me uncomfortable" people are also the people that complain about PC folks. These same people think they should be able to say whatever hateful/hurtful things they want without repercussion -- and that the people it offends need to "toughen up". Yet these same people also claim that it's OK for them to be made uncomfortable in a locker room?
I see a double standard here developing...
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
What privilege would that be?
Come LesMis, you're being obtuse. I know you are smarter than that well studied in feminist philosophy. Don't play the dumb card to push my buttons. It is beneath you.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Domo1
I am straight, but I do not fit in neatly anywhere either.
I have to say, on that level I identify very strongly with folks who are often deliberately misunderstood and are victims largely of the stupidity of others.
Essentially, an awful lot of people have an ignorance problem, and they are not the ones getting told they cannot use the right locker room for them.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
For a shelter, you are right. Homeless females have been through hell. A women's shelter should be a women's shelter. You can't actually tell a homeless woman to find another shelter if they don't like it, there may not be a bed available anywhere else in the city. In this case, this is one's home, such as it is and there is nowhere else to go.
These are 2 different cases.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: JadeStar
She had a separate facility for her use. She chose not to use it.
I can understand why the rest of the girls would not want to use the locker room with an anatomical male.