It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96
Federal cemeteries are STILL state owned and managed. The Federal government has EVERY right to ban them there. It's the same arguments as removing it from the state house. Seriously, for champions of individual rights, it certainly would help you guys to learn what the difference between private and public ownership is...
So banning is okay in some places, just not others.
M'kay.
Public versus private ownership. Go look it up.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96
Federal cemeteries are STILL state owned and managed. The Federal government has EVERY right to ban them there. It's the same arguments as removing it from the state house. Seriously, for champions of individual rights, it certainly would help you guys to learn what the difference between private and public ownership is...
So banning is okay in some places, just not others.
M'kay.
Public versus private ownership. Go look it up.
All you had to say was that you were for banning, then provide a caveat. See?
So you are for banning (but only in certain places).
And I did give an example, even provided a name.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Krazysh0t
And you are for banning of the flag.
Just based on location, location, location.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: introvert
That's what I was afraid of.
And that's why I believe that people just like yourself would support a ban.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer
The government of the people has every right to debate about what goes or doesn't go on lands owned by the people. How much are you willing to cede of our voice over the government? Removal from public grounds is not a threat to free speech.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You are for banning the flag on public property.
What's so hard to figure out.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You are for banning the flag on public property.
What's so hard to figure out.
I been trying to figure this out.
The Nazi flag was a bigger symbol of racism, and hatred but doesn't generate the traffic the confederate flag does.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer
Oh stop being ridiculous. The government nor the people it is of, have no obligation to maintain Confederate burial sites, let alone buy their flags and pay people to place them at their headstones. Such a practice has nothing to do with free speech. If private groups wish to take on that role the US government should hold no objection.
First the Confederate battle flag was lowered from the State House grounds Friday. Hours later state maintenance crews removed the flag pole and the iron fence surrounding it.
Monday morning, crews were back at the site where the flag flew near the Confederate Memorial to remove the concrete slab that once supported the flag pole.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer
Oh stop being ridiculous. The government nor the people it is of, have no obligation to maintain Confederate burial sites, let alone buy their flags and pay people to place them at their headstones. Such a practice has nothing to do with free speech. If private groups wish to take on that role the US government should hold no objection.
Do you ever get the feeling that you are arguing with someone who is carrying on a 100% different argument than you are? Because I am certainly getting that feeling.
The government nor the people it is of, have no obligation to maintain Confederate burial sites, let alone buy their flags and pay people to place them at their headstones.