It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
_BoneZ_
Phage
Then what?
Then we can observe them. Or, we could help them along their way. Even better, we could develop our own Prime Directive and leave them alone until they matured to a certain technological point.
dragonridr
DarksideOz
0zzymand0s
reply to post by DarksideOz
A star faring civilization doesn't need slaves because robots exist.
A star faring civilization doesn't mine gold using slaves because supernovae exist.
Ahhhh, of course. The robots !
Why spend valuable star faring time making robots when you can have humans with more range of movement and able to make on the spot decisions that a robot may not be able to ? And why make robots when you can have human slaves that make new slaves amongst themselves, raise them, feed them, cloth them, and then more future slaves. Do you know where they got the minerals to make the robots ? Do we know who did the work before the robots, or was the concept of slave labour and robots thought of at the same time ?
If aliens came to earth it wouldnt be for mining makes no since everything they could want is in the asteroid belt and alot easier to get to if you can travel through space. Be a huge waist of resources to try to enslave a planet destroy it on the other hand easy. Sit in space bombard it with asteroids .
Shiloh7
As I understand it, without our moon, we could not exist due to the tidal pull which stops the water on earth stagnating and poisoning all life. We rely on night and day and could not survive without (literally) our beauty sleep. We also rely on a set degree of tilt, again which were it to vary could be the end of us.
Alien planets without big, climate-stabilizing moons like the one that orbits Earth may still be capable of supporting life, a new study reports.
Previous modeling work had suggested that Earth's axial tilt, or obliquity, would vary wildly over long time spans without the moon's steadying gravitational influence, creating huge climate swings that would make it tough for life to get a foothold on our planet.
But that's not necessarily the case, said Jack Lissauer of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif.
DarksideOz
dragonridr
DarksideOz
0zzymand0s
reply to post by DarksideOz
A star faring civilization doesn't need slaves because robots exist.
A star faring civilization doesn't mine gold using slaves because supernovae exist.
Ahhhh, of course. The robots !
Why spend valuable star faring time making robots when you can have humans with more range of movement and able to make on the spot decisions that a robot may not be able to ? And why make robots when you can have human slaves that make new slaves amongst themselves, raise them, feed them, cloth them, and then more future slaves. Do you know where they got the minerals to make the robots ? Do we know who did the work before the robots, or was the concept of slave labour and robots thought of at the same time ?
If aliens came to earth it wouldnt be for mining makes no since everything they could want is in the asteroid belt and alot easier to get to if you can travel through space. Be a huge waist of resources to try to enslave a planet destroy it on the other hand easy. Sit in space bombard it with asteroids .
But if it's available on Earth and on an Asteroid belt, then there is still just as much likelihood that Earth could of been a viable option. Earth may of offered other assets that an asteroid belt couldn't ? We don't how they may of thought, or what was a better option. What may seem as the logical solution to us, may not be so logical to a more advanced species ?
Also, mining from an asteroid belt will still require either themselves doing the work, or robots that will need to be manufactured, transported and not to mention getting the materials to build them. Now that seems like a huge waste of resources. But if you can have human slaves do it all for you, it may just be worth the extra travel distance knowing that it's all being done for them ?
This theory is no more unlikely than your asteroid belt theory.
DistantThunder
Technology advance hasn't made humans any less violent, thus far.
Applying that model to 'more' advanced humanoids from space would just mean more of the same.
Some species out there could be a BILLION years older than us, OR MORE.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by DarksideOz
If resources were what they wanted, they could easily find it elsewhere, in much higher quantities. Besides, how would they even know about us? Since you are going by the "ANCIENT" astronaut theory, what presence would indicate any civilization here? We weren't communicating with radio or television, and there wasn't a single thing in space. How the hell would they know we're all here if they have no communications to look at? The Sumerians certainly didn't have radio beacons or anything that would make our presence known in space. So even if they came here to get slaves (I've already previously covered why this is in of itself implausible ), how the hell would they even know there were "slaves" here in the first place? Did they just happen to pass through a random solar system and stumble on the Earth and say "Oooh let's enslave them?" I highly doubt it.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by DarksideOz
If resources were what they wanted, they could easily find it elsewhere, in much higher quantities. Besides, how would they even know about us? Since you are going by the "ANCIENT" astronaut theory, what presence would indicate any civilization here? We weren't communicating with radio or television, and there wasn't a single thing in space. How the hell would they know we're all here if they have no communications to look at? The Sumerians certainly didn't have radio beacons or anything that would make our presence known in space. So even if they came here to get slaves (I've already previously covered why this is in of itself implausible ), how the hell would they even know there were "slaves" here in the first place? Did they just happen to pass through a random solar system and stumble on the Earth and say "Oooh let's enslave them?" I highly doubt it.
DarksideOz
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by DarksideOz
If resources were what they wanted, they could easily find it elsewhere, in much higher quantities. Besides, how would they even know about us? Since you are going by the "ANCIENT" astronaut theory, what presence would indicate any civilization here? We weren't communicating with radio or television, and there wasn't a single thing in space. How the hell would they know we're all here if they have no communications to look at? The Sumerians certainly didn't have radio beacons or anything that would make our presence known in space. So even if they came here to get slaves (I've already previously covered why this is in of itself implausible ), how the hell would they even know there were "slaves" here in the first place? Did they just happen to pass through a random solar system and stumble on the Earth and say "Oooh let's enslave them?" I highly doubt it.
Ummmmm, have you not read the part were I have on several occasions mentioned genetic engineering. Who is to say that humans were here already, and I have never once made that claim ? Can you prove beyond doubt how humans came into existence on this planet to begin with ?
So I am supposed to just accept the view that we evolved from an ape species to the point of where we are today ? Or is it that we were created by a God to the point of where we are today ? Yet even the slightest thought that we may of simply been engineered by another, more advanced species to serve their needs and purposes, and possibly just being left to our own devices once our services were no longer required, is considered implausible, or absolutely NO chance of being true.
If you are going to acknowledge the Sumerian civilization, then you may want to do some more research into what many of their ancient stories actually suggest. You will find that on many occasions the Sumerians actually refer to the very things you call implausible. Or is it just selective implausibility ?
You will also see many references to genetic engineering and references to DNA. I suppose it's just "unusual" that the first known civilisation knew of such things approx.6000 years ago, yet humans have only made the DNA connection in recent times ?
And ever since that first known civilization, there has been a history of human slavery. Where did the Sumerians come from to be the first "known" civilization ? If they were not originally from here, then why did they choose Earth and not an asteroid belt ?
Just a few questions to ask yourself before using the word "implausible" !
You will also see many references to genetic engineering and references to DNA. I suppose it's just "unusual" that the first known civilisation knew of such things approx.6000 years ago, yet humans have only made the DNA connection in recent times ?