It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dogstar23
...never leaving a Trail more than about 5x the apparent length of the plane.
I noticed the definite change around 95-96, i'm shocked more don't remember what contrails looked like before. I don't know what they're for, but I know they're not the same as the contrails we had for decades.
Originally posted by Pilot
Those are just innocent contrails.
If not, it's definitely photoshopped.
The music = really bad.
Those are NEVER the long white lines in the sky.
This is where this argument gets so frustrating. Chemicals are often dispersed in the atmosphere for a variety of reasons, and this is common knowledge, but they are NEVER used at those high altitudes, and they could never create those long white lines.
There are chemicals in the air, there just aren't any chemtrails.
Regional: 747s operating regionally from multiple bases
o 14 airplanes, payload dispersed over 1,500 km cruise leg at a rate of
0.036 kg/m flown
o $0.8B for acquisition and $1B for one year of operations
o 0.66M tonnes fuel burned per year
Transit: 747s transiting from 8 bases
o 24 airplanes, payload dispersed over 5,000 km cruise leg at a rate of
0.012 kg/m flown
o $1.4 B for acquisition and $2.8B for one year of operations
o 1.6M tonnes fuel burned per year
Transit: 747s transiting from 4 bases
o 48 airplanes, payload dispersed over 11,000 km cruise leg at a rate of
0.005 kg/m flown
o $2.8B for acquisition and $4.5B for one year of operations
o 3.24M tonnes fuel burned per year
4.2.4 Thrust Augmentation via Sulfuric Acid Injection
In the case of the present system, a significant quantity of sulfuric acid will be stored on
the aircraft and ejected into the atmosphere during flight. This liquid could be injected
into the engine to provide additional thrust at high altitudes to combat thrust lapse. As
discussed in the previous section elevated sulfur content is detrimental to engine component life, and consequently traditional liquid injection techniques (compressor inlet
injection) would not be appropriate for this system. However, some thrust augmentation
may be realizable by injecting the sulfuric acid downstream of the turbine, in a manner
similar to a modern afterburner. By this approach, to achieve thrust increases the turbine exhaust gases must be hot enough to vaporize the sulfuric acid.
Option 1: Increasing Sulfur Content of Jet Fuel in Commercial Fleet
Option 2: Direct Injection of Sulfur Dioxide Gas Using Dedicated Fleet of Jet Aircraft
Option 3: Direct Injection of Sulfur Dioxide Gas Using High Altitude Jet Aircraft
Option 4: Direct Injection of Ammonium Sulfate Aerosol Using Dedicated Fleet of Jet Aircraft
Option 5: Running Commercial Jet Engines with Richer Fuel to Air Ratio
Option 6: Running Dedicated Fleet of Jet Engines with Richer Fuel to Air Ratio
Option 7: Running High Altitude Aircraft Jet Engines with Richer Fuel to Air Ratio
Originally posted by Thorazine
Originally posted by dogstar23
...never leaving a Trail more than about 5x the apparent length of the plane.
I noticed the definite change around 95-96, i'm shocked more don't remember what contrails looked like before. I don't know what they're for, but I know they're not the same as the contrails we had for decades.
I have no doubt that is, in fact, what you remember. Is the human memory infallible?
What about others who have different memories?
What about other evidence such as decades of scientific research and decades of historical evidence that suggest your memory may not be an absolute?
What do you make of these photos dating back decades that contradict your memory?
contrailscience.com...
metabunk.org...
There is no conceivable way to create a tornado or a hurricane.
AND this is how is supposed to look like early challenger space shuttle mission see any difference
Option 1: Increasing Sulfur Content of Jet Fuel in Commercial Fleet
Option 5: Running Commercial Jet Engines with Richer Fuel to Air Ratio
Option 6: Running Dedicated Fleet of Jet Engines with Richer Fuel to Air Ratio
Option 7: Running High Altitude Aircraft Jet Engines with Richer Fuel to Air Ratio
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Human_Alien
Its not purposeful on and off of exhaust, it is pockets of moisture. Have you ever flown? Clouds are on and off also. I've already posted this several times, I'm not going to give the links again, but just look at the wiki on clouds, do a little simple math, and see if there is any known aircraft that could carry enough mass to create one small cloud. For the record, there isn't. One small little puffy cumulus cloud weighs more than any airplane could carry and spray.
And, any surface on an aircraft can create enough compression of air to make a contrail, it isn't always the engine, even though they are the most likely. Sometimes it is where the wing meets the fuselage, or sometimes it is at the wingtip, or the stabilizer tip. It is all about the vortexes around the plane. During a turn it is often the wider wingtip.
Point is, you cannot test for a chemical that could degrade quickly as it's no longer there, and when testing for something it really helps to have a clue what chemical we are testing for.
You cannot just take an air sample, find a few chemicals, and claim definitively that said chemicals in the test were from X location arbitrarily. Especially if we don't even know what chemical we are looking for in the first place.
There are a lot of problems here that complicate this "evidence finding mission" greatly. And sadly, it leaves us where we started, not really knowing much.
There is NO WAY POSSIBLE that supposed planes spray a 'grid' over a city so thick that it leave a fog, as is often reported by chemtrail folks, and it NOT show up these samples. It's just impossible. No one can address that, except to make vague claims like you did, which are completely false. I'd recommend reading up on sampling, and see exactly what is done, and how it's done. I realize many people don't want to - they would rather just believe in the chemspraying boogieman as it were. But the facts are out there for those who want the actual truth of the matter.
Originally posted by shortywarn
i do have one question,,,,,,,,,,,,,, if this is true,,,,,, and we have weather mods etc
why the hell aren't planes spraying 24/7 to save the corn crop,,,,,,,,, why not seed some rain in the midwest, southwest, texas,, the east where crops are drying up
what the hell are they waiting for????
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by IpsissimusMagus
ok - at a given temp / pressure [ you choose ] - how much water [ mass / vol ] can a given mass / vol of a hydroscopic chemical [ you choose the one you belioeve is sutible to be sprayed ] absorbe ?
www.youtube.com...
When a solution of Barium chloride is poored into a solution of sodium sulfate a white precipitate of Barium sulfate is formed.
01 September 2009The Royal Society has published the findings of a major study into geoengineering the climate. The study, chaired by Professor John Shepherd FRS, was researched and written over a period of twelve months by twelve leading academics representing science, economics, law and social science.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by Phage
That is only one patent number - there are many and many for you to choose from but I note you only chose one. The one you chose was as a result of you reading my post - you should post more about all the other patents - there are many - I know because I have looked. You should try looking at all the patents and researching them all it would make you look as though you are interested in learning and not just out to destroy the singular posts of people who enjoy the participation of learning through discussion on this thread.
.
Originally posted by IpsissimusMagus
Normal contrails will not persist in the same ways as chemtrails.