It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jude11
Always been a believer. Thank you.
When I see my clear blue sky become filled with 'trails' within an hour and then have a haze that covers the sun for hours, I have to wonder how it looks in the city, near airports...
Since I am NO WHERE NEAR A CITY OR AIRPORT...how does it happen in my sky this summer and not once in the last 50 years?
Peace
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by deadeyedick
reply to post by Uncinus
I agree i don't think it would be that profound since it would not get as hot as a engine exhaust does.
My first thought was a toilet drain but from what i have seen it would clump together somewhat and freeze and not form a con trail.
It would certainly not clump. The drains on planes are heated to avoid freezing as the water exits (look up "heated drain mast"), but once it gets into the 500 mph air, the water will instantly be aerosolized into a fine mist which will then either evaporate or freeze then sublimate away, or it might form a contrail if humidity is high enough.
How many times do you have to be told that the word is Contrails not chemtrails. And the other word is paranoid.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
I've' always wondered about the pilots. So I consider two, no three scenarios.
One- these are drone planes controlled by Black Operatives who are soul-less to begin with.
Two- the pilots are told they're doing something good yet secretive (so not to cause alarm) to shield harmful rays
Three-the pilots are Manchurian candidate-like...... working on command.
Thanks for sharing and posting
Originally posted by fleabit
Still waiting for an answer chemtrailers.
Why do none of extensive daily testing over most cities and even parks, reservoirs, landfills, creeks, lakes, etc. come up with any results that indicate this spraying is taking place?
It looks like in october of 2010 190 nations signed a ban on Geo-engineering. The United States did not sign it.
The 193 signatories to the convention agreed to outlaw such geoengineering projects "until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate consideration of the associated risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts". The agreement exempted "small-scale scientific research studies".
Originally posted by rickymouse
There is also a lot of people who support Geo-engineering in this country, way more than oppose it.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by rickymouse
It looks like in october of 2010 190 nations signed a ban on Geo-engineering. The United States did not sign it.
Yes they did....
There are 193 united nations member states and all 193 agreed to the ban...
The 193 signatories to the convention agreed to outlaw such geoengineering projects "until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate consideration of the associated risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts". The agreement exempted "small-scale scientific research studies".
www.newscientist.com...