It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by Sailor Sam
You need to read the entire genealogy list in Genesis 5.
The Bible mentions that Adam and Eve had other sons and daughters besides Cain, Abel and Seth.
Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes, the scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome.
The vast majority of those differences are not biologically significant, but researchers were able to identify a couple thousand differences that are potentially important to the evolution of the human lineage.
and experiment
Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
Looks like you need to do more research, regardless.
Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes, the scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome.
The vast majority of those differences are not biologically significant, but researchers were able to identify a couple thousand differences that are potentially important to the evolution of the human lineage.
news.nationalgeographic.com...
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Deetermined
Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes
We actually share more similarities with sunflower plants than chimps, guess we had a common ancestor with them too.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
and experiment
What do you think "repeatable" means? Why do scientists do experiments? To get different results than their theories expect to find?
Come on. lol
And you cannot have one before the other, RNA tells the protein how to form from the cellular level, and the different types of protein make up the RNA.
It's impossible for them to have both evolved without the other, they must have been created at the exact same moment in time. It's a mathematical impossibility of absurd proportions.
That's the proverbial "nail" in Darwin's coffin. The discovery of the nature and makeup of the DNA and RNA destroyed Darwin. Shredded his theory which at the time he made it had no clue about DNA or RNA. Mostly the only folks who still cling to the theory are Evolutionary Biologists, that's it. And they are ill-qualified and educated to argue against the discoveries made at the molecular level.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
We are more closely related to sunflowers than mushrooms...creationists simply replace the mushrooms with chimps
Modern human DNA reveals all sorts of unsuspected data: for example that humans are more closely related to mushrooms than sunflowers. Analysis of DNA of humans and mushrooms indicated the two groups split about 1.5 billion years ago. The split between humans and flowers was before that.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by Deetermined
My point is, we supposedly SHARE 96% of the same DNA with chimpanzees, but that doesn't make us one!
Of course not...our DNA isn't 100% the same
Who cares what DNA we share if science can't figure out the sequencing?
But we have sequenced it...that's how we know we share 96% in common for crying out loud!!!
96%? That's not enough certainty to convict someone of a triple homicide. It definitely isn't enough to state that humans came from monkeys
It's not 96% "certainty", it's an identical match of 96% with only 4% difference. So comparing it to a court case is silly, those 2 percentages have entirely different meanings
How is it the "nail in Darwin's coffin" if his theory makes no claims regarding how life started
FACT: We don't know what came first because we DON'T KNOW how life started in the first place.
Oh, and regarding the "repeatable" thing, I already told you that scientists have witnessed it in the lab.
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by Deetermined
My point is, we supposedly SHARE 96% of the same DNA with chimpanzees, but that doesn't make us one!
Of course not...our DNA isn't 100% the same
Who cares what DNA we share if science can't figure out the sequencing?
But we have sequenced it...that's how we know we share 96% in common for crying out loud!!!
96%? That's not enough certainty to convict someone of a triple homicide. It definitely isn't enough to state that humans came from monkeys
It's not 96% "certainty", it's an identical match of 96% with only 4% difference. So comparing it to a court case is silly, those 2 percentages have entirely different meanings
Let me put it into perspective to you. The identical matches between parts of the human and monkey genome are certain, established beyond doubt. In court, the job of the prosecution is to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt. If you were the prosecution, you damage your case if you try to marginalize the difference.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
How is it the "nail in Darwin's coffin" if his theory makes no claims regarding how life started
Well why did the guy write a book titled "Origin of Species..."
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
FACT: We don't know what came first because we DON'T KNOW how life started in the first place.
Speak for yourself for one thing. And for two, USE YOUR BRAIN.
Which came first the protein or the RNA? Thiiiiiiiink. Soon you should realize it's impossible unless both were instantaneously created.
Oh, and regarding the "repeatable" thing, I already told you that scientists have witnessed it in the lab.
I hope you're not going to talk about the Miller experiment. That's an experiment in intelligent design, he set up the conditions of the test. And for two he had the wrong mixture for what was once thought was the atmosphere present when life began.
edit on 18-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
FACT: We don't know what came first because we DON'T KNOW how life started in the first place.
Speak for yourself for one thing. And for two, USE YOUR BRAIN.
Which came first the protein or the RNA? Thiiiiiiiink. Soon you should realize it's impossible unless both were instantaneously created.
Oh, and regarding the "repeatable" thing, I already told you that scientists have witnessed it in the lab.
I hope you're not going to talk about the Miller experiment. That's an experiment in intelligent design, he set up the conditions of the test. And for two he had the wrong mixture for what was once thought was the atmosphere present when life began.
Newsflash: You don't know either how life started in the first place.
You delude yourself into pretending "blind belief" is "knowledge",
but deep down (at least I hope so) you know that your belief isn't knowledge.
And scientists don't know what came first, there's no objective answer either way...so more research is required.
You on the other hand seem to be perfectly happy to fill that gap in knowledge with magic (aka god). According to that "approach", we can make up whatever the hell we want and never have to prove anything. Planes you ask? They fly because giant invisible unicorns lift them through the skies. Proof you ask? Who cares about proof, just blindly believe
Oh, and I am using my brain and logic/rationality...you on the other hand don't seem to be a friend of logic at all
Oh, and I'm sorry to burst your bubble...but there's been tons of experiments since Miller. They already managed to create fully functional RNA based on the conditions of earth back then. LINK
What I think is hilarious is that you attack science,
yet so far you failed completely at presenting the slightest bit of evidence yourself.
Can't blame you though, the bible is obviously not objective evidence given how much in it is DEMONSTRABLY wrong, and there simply is no objective evidence...but you could at least entertain us and give it a try