It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
I am very good at Biology, Physics and Math...thank you. And although the Human Genome Mapping project was not done for the purpose to prove or disprove our beginnings...after comparing the thousands of other Animals and Plants Genomes that we have mapped so far....one thing is common...VIRAL DNA. The Human Genome is between 9 and 11 percent viral encoding.
WHEN, in 2001, the human genome was sequenced for the first time, we were confronted by several surprises. One was the sheer lack of genes: where we had anticipated perhaps 100,000 there were actually as few as 20,000. A bigger surprise came from analysis of the genetic sequences, which revealed that these genes made up a mere 1.5 per cent of the genome. This is dwarfed by DNA deriving from viruses, which amounts to roughly 9 per cent.
On top of that, huge chunks of the genome are made up of mysterious virus-like entities called retrotransposons, pieces of selfish DNA that appear to serve no function other than to make copies of themselves. These account for no less than 34 per cent of our genome. We Humans are the EVOLUTIONARY byproduct of the Universe since evolution applies to Atomic and Molecular Evolution. In our Star...Hydrogen is fused into Helium...in SUPERNOVAS....heavy elements such as Iron, Copper, Gold...etc...were produced so we are made from the stuff Stars.
Human Beings are the Multiversal Byproduct of this Divergent Universal Reality and state of 13.75 plus or minus .11 Billion Years. EVOLUTION is the process as it applies to both Living and Non-Living things. So when you tell me to read a Biology Book...you should include ALOT more in the concepts for which you have decided proves or disproves my post.
A VIRUS IS NOT ALIVE! That's right! It is a snippet of DNA that once has penetrated a cell will multiply and cause that cell to BURST...thus allowing for easy trasmital. One the Original Single Celled Organism from which ALL Plant and Animal life came from was INFECTED...three things happened that allow us to trace our origins.
1. The Single celled Organism infected with the Virus...burst and allowed transmition of Viuses to other Single Celled Organisms.
2. The VIRUS DNA changed after infection of it's host.
3. The Single Celled Organism which was able to ward off full penetration of it's cell wall by the Virus and although infected was was able to continue living and reproducing by Mitosis. It's reproduced versions of itself were now immune to this Virus.
THIS SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM...now carried within its DNA and it's Progeny...Innert Viral DNA. This Innert DNA was carried along to all currently living Plants and Animals on the Face of this Earth. PLUS...the Original VIRUS that had it fought off DNA can be compared to current VIRAL DNA that although the Viruses have also evolved...they still maintain part of the Original Virus in their Non-Living short chain Amino acid structure.
THIS is why we know that ALL ANIMAL AND PLANT LIFE came from an Original Single Celled Animal.
As far as believing in GOD and CREATION...I NEVER mentioned the Bible....One could say that GOD used the Process of EVOLUTION to create the MULTIVERSE...OUR DIVERGENT UNIVERSAL REALITY....AND ALL LIFE IN IT....including Humans. Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by addygrace
So there were more than one Adam and Eve? Did they evolve in 2 seperate lines, at 2 seperate times? How could that be?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by addygrace
You look at Humanity as if we started as a small group or two of Homosapiens.....EVOLUTION BABY! Split Infinity
How can you still not get this?
Reread what I posted on how Humanity evolved....Adam and Eve is a nice STORY....nothing more.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by addygrace
So there were more than one Adam and Eve? Did they evolve in 2 seperate lines, at 2 seperate times? How could that be?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by addygrace
You look at Humanity as if we started as a small group or two of Homosapiens.....EVOLUTION BABY! Split Infinity
How can you still not get this?
Reread what I posted on how Humanity evolved....Adam and Eve is a nice STORY....nothing more.
Split Infinity
That's not true, it's a very sad story too. But there is always a bright side with God.
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
God did it.
Mitochondrial Eve is alleged to have lived in Africa at the beginning of the Upper Pleistocene period (between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago). She has been described as the most-recent common ancestor of all humans on Earth today, with respect to matrilineal descent. The validity of these assertions, however, is dependent upon two critically important assumptions: (1) that mtDNA is, in fact, derived exclusively from the mother; and (2) that the mutation rates associated with mtDNA have remained constant over time. However, we now know that both of these assumptions are wrong!
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
Mitochondrial Eve is alleged to have lived in Africa at the beginning of the Upper Pleistocene period (between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago). She has been described as the most-recent common ancestor of all humans on Earth today, with respect to matrilineal descent. The validity of these assertions, however, is dependent upon two critically important assumptions: (1) that mtDNA is, in fact, derived exclusively from the mother; and (2) that the mutation rates associated with mtDNA have remained constant over time. However, we now know that both of these assumptions are wrong!
www.trueorigin.org...
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
You're absurdly loose with the terms "we" and "fact".
(* god is outside of time and space answers are not accepted as a valid answer)
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by XyZeR
(* god is outside of time and space answers are not accepted as a valid answer)
Well get your arse off of ATS and go get the Nobel Prize for showing that Einstein was a raving fool with his General Relativity theory. (The same theory that's been proven by 14 different methods down to 19 decimal places)
What are you waiting for??? Get that million bucks friend!!!
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
You're absurdly loose with the terms "we" and "fact".
"We" as in scientists (and myself because I read up on it), and "fact" because well...it is a fact.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by XyZeR
(* god is outside of time and space answers are not accepted as a valid answer)
Well get your arse off of ATS and go get the Nobel Prize for showing that Einstein was a raving fool with his General Relativity theory. (The same theory that's been proven by 14 different methods down to 19 decimal places)
What are you waiting for??? Get that million bucks friend!!!
What are you talking about??? Einstein's general relativity theory never made any statements regarding god's outside time and space
Originally posted by XyZeR
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
God did it.
Who did god?
If everything needs a creator : Who or what created god*?
(* god is outside of time and space answers are not accepted as a valid answer)
Science tests and observes things that are repeatable. The origin of man is not. FAIL
And you know what you're talking about because you read books. Well, that's a brilliant argument, I read books too so I'm also right.
And like I said, your definition of the term "FACT" is absurdly loose. Get back to that indoctrin.. I mean education, you're not even close. Once science discovered the DNA strand Darwin was killed immediately, it was a mountain of overkill.
3 out of 4 error correcting code cannot exist by random chance processes. It's mathematically impossible by a factor of 10^5000th power. Modern computer programmers cannot do this yet today, they are trying to. And your "science" defines anything greater than 10^50th as "impossible".
I don't think you know much at all about Physics or science actually just by what you say here. I have serious doubts, maybe you misspoke.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
I can destroy Darwinian Evolutionary theory with one question.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by XyZeR
(* god is outside of time and space answers are not accepted as a valid answer)
Well get your arse off of ATS and go get the Nobel Prize for showing that Einstein was a raving fool with his General Relativity theory. (The same theory that's been proven by 14 different methods down to 19 decimal places)
What are you waiting for??? Get that million bucks friend!!!
What are you talking about??? Einstein's general relativity theory never made any statements regarding god's outside time and space
Stay completely out of this discussion, you're taking a water pistol to a nuclear war. A Physicist would immediately know I'm talking about the nature of time and it's an illusion we perceive being inside the time domain.
Stop.
edit on 17-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Like I said, Mitochondrial Eve isn't an "Eve" in the religious sense. She was one of MANY early homo sapiens.
As for mtDNA being derived exclusively from the mother...every single time we look at mtDNA that's the case, so it's a very reasonable assumption. We also have no indication that mtDNA mutation rates have changed drastically over time.
Mammalian mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is thought to be strictly maternally inherited…. Very small amounts of paternally inherited mtDNA have been detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in mice after several generations of interspecific backcrosses…. We report the case of a 28-year-old man with mitochondrial myopathy due to a novel 2-bp mtDNA deletion…. We determined that the mtDNA harboring the mutation was paternal in origin and accounted for 90 percent of the patient’s muscle mtDNA (Schwartz and Vissing, 2002, 347:576, emphasis added).
Either way, as much as many creationists loooooove to quote that mitochondrial Eve, it's really not comparable to the Genesis story.
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
And because we know there was no single woman and single man at any given point in time, we know for a FACT that the literal interpretation of the Genesis account is complete and utter nonsense
You know this as a FACT how?