It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
That's the only answer you have?
Can you give us some scientific insight from your sources?
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
Well, I'm sure science and common sense never led us to believe that man could be created from the dust of the earth either, but I think science is on it's way to proving it and the Bible already told us that it was so.
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
If science can't figure out how life first started, how can they figure out with certainty how it evolved? Isn't that like putting the chicken before the egg? Sure, we can all say evolution exists, but if science can't figure out what made it evolve, how can we know for sure what anything evolved from? Science can come up with all the similarities they want, but it's all a puzzle where even one missing piece can change the total outcome.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
I can destroy Darwinian Evolutionary theory with one question.
I just posted a link showing you that they CAN prove the origin of man
Oh please do...this should be fun
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
That's the only answer you have?
Can you give us some scientific insight from your sources?
Look, anyone with common sense knows that the entire human population can't stem from 1 brother and 1 system. If they're blood relatives, it would result in massive genetic defects, and science fully backs that up. Do I really have to post pictures of those defects??
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Scientists can also figure out if you have parts of Neanderthal DNA in you as so many people do...but they don't need to know how life started for that either
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
I can destroy Darwinian Evolutionary theory with one question.
I just posted a link showing you that they CAN prove the origin of man
Go check out the "scientific method", the origin of man is neither observable nor repeatable. Your speculation of it is "religion" be default.
Oh please do...this should be fun
You've already shown you don't have the specialized training or understanding to even attempt a qualified response.
edit on 17-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
"a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."
Which came first the protein or the RNA?
Originally posted by Deetermined
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Scientists can also figure out if you have parts of Neanderthal DNA in you as so many people do...but they don't need to know how life started for that either
The heck they don't!! Just because we share common DNA with Neanderthals doesn't mean anything. We also share common DNA with dirt for crying out loud!! Do you get my point here? Until they can match DNA 100%, they have nothing.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by Deetermined
reply to post by MrXYZ
That's the only answer you have?
Can you give us some scientific insight from your sources?
Look, anyone with common sense knows that the entire human population can't stem from 1 brother and 1 system. If they're blood relatives, it would result in massive genetic defects, and science fully backs that up. Do I really have to post pictures of those defects??
The original two wouldn't have corrupted gene pool and mating-specific mutations in their DNA strand.
*facepalm*
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Dirt doesn't have DNA...but whatever
And what do you mean by "match DNA 100%"?? They have matched Neanderthal DNA with homo sapiens sapiens DNA...so I don't know what your point is.
My point is, we supposedly SHARE 96% of the same DNA with chimpanzees, but that doesn't make us one!
Who cares what DNA we share if science can't figure out the sequencing?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by Deetermined
My point is, we supposedly SHARE 96% of the same DNA with chimpanzees, but that doesn't make us one!
Of course not...our DNA isn't 100% the same
Who cares what DNA we share if science can't figure out the sequencing?
But we have sequenced it...that's how we know we share 96% in common for crying out loud!!!
Originally posted by Deetermined
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Dirt doesn't have DNA...but whatever
Alright, let's call it the DNA of the living organisms found in dirt...but whatever.
And what do you mean by "match DNA 100%"?? They have matched Neanderthal DNA with homo sapiens sapiens DNA...so I don't know what your point is.
My point is, we supposedly SHARE 96% of the same DNA with chimpanzees, but that doesn't make us one!
news.nationalgeographic.com...
Who cares what DNA we share if science can't figure out the sequencing?
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by Deetermined
My point is, we supposedly SHARE 96% of the same DNA with chimpanzees, but that doesn't make us one!
Of course not...our DNA isn't 100% the same
Who cares what DNA we share if science can't figure out the sequencing?
But we have sequenced it...that's how we know we share 96% in common for crying out loud!!!
96%? That's not enough certainty to convict someone of a triple homicide. It definitely isn't enough to state that humans came from monkeys