It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
This is where you are wrong by calling it an audit.
It is a partisan charade that will prove nothing, political grandstanding that will help Trump get a few more donations before he stands trial.
Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans
It is in fact a Witch Hunt.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
This is where you are wrong by calling it an audit.
It is a partisan charade that will prove nothing, political grandstanding that will help Trump get a few more donations before he stands trial.
Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans
It is in fact a Witch Hunt.
Well, they can stop looking for the witch. I found her.
This is not a witch hunt. No matter how many Lefties say it is. It is an audit. A forensic audit.
originally posted by: network dude
when you say "witch hunt" do you mean like the Russia hoax done on Trump, or do you mean a different kind of witch hunt?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
This is where you are wrong by calling it an audit.
It is a partisan charade that will prove nothing, political grandstanding that will help Trump get a few more donations before he stands trial.
Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans
It is in fact a Witch Hunt.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Annee
Ahhh... Now you're going to tell me what I really think??? How special... And it's just plain old crap.
I've made no bones about supporting this Senate audit... And I've given very specific reasons that you don't want to hear. Any and all good Republicans on here will tell you that I've expressed plenty of non-Republican positions and opinions on many subjects.
Believe what you will. But I have said what I meant and I have meant what I said.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
This is where you are wrong by calling it an audit.
It is a partisan charade that will prove nothing, political grandstanding that will help Trump get a few more donations before he stands trial.
Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans
It is in fact a Witch Hunt.
Well, they can stop looking for the witch. I found her.
This is not a witch hunt. No matter how many Lefties say it is. It is an audit. A forensic audit.
I'm with Rev Al Sharpton. He said all that's needed is for Republicans to create enough doubt in minds of voters that CHEATING is why Joe Biden is President, and Democrats will be severely damaged in local, state and national elections for at least a decade.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
Some more discussion elsewhere
twitter.com...
gab.com...
Josh Barnett is saying that the "actual number is way off" from the 2.1 million ballots that are supposed to be there.
Christina Bobb said that they will likely find “substantially less” than 2.1 million ballots.
Boris Epshteyn said that 25% or more of the boxes are missing ballots.
Didn't they already have two earlier recount audits in Arizona? And isn't 2.1 million ballots what they counted? There seems to be a discrepancy somewhere. Perhaps those first two audits did count 2.1 million ballots, but if there is less now, where did they go? And WHY did they disappear? When did they disappear? Something doesn't add up.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
Some more discussion elsewhere
twitter.com...
gab.com...
Josh Barnett is saying that the "actual number is way off" from the 2.1 million ballots that are supposed to be there.
Christina Bobb said that they will likely find “substantially less” than 2.1 million ballots.
Boris Epshteyn said that 25% or more of the boxes are missing ballots.
Didn't they already have two earlier recount audits in Arizona? And isn't 2.1 million ballots what they counted? There seems to be a discrepancy somewhere. Perhaps those first two audits did count 2.1 million ballots, but if there is less now, where did they go? And WHY did they disappear? When did they disappear? Something doesn't add up.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
Perhaps they simply should not have cheated?
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Boadicea
You are the one who promotes this as an unbiased thread.
Its really not.
Neither is the AZ "audit".
originally posted by: bellagirl
can someone please update what is happening with this process now? Being overseas we dont hear about updates or news of the count. How much longer does is have to go? how will the results be announced? what are the chances of results having an impact etc.
Cheers.
originally posted by: 13Kiwi20qYes
Feel that be good news Yes ?
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: 13Kiwi20qYes
Feel that be good news Yes ?
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
I honestly don't know.
Some of the rumors seem too over the top to be real.
To me anyway.
I do think that both parties seem to be acting like at least significant mistakes have been found, but I could just be imagining that.
So back to not knowing.
originally posted by: 13Kiwi20qYes
Maybe there is some timing involved also, best time to wow people, both sides, or not.
a reply to: 13Kiwi20qYes