-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -21-

a reply to: carewemust

Good looking guy with connections all over and a pretty wife who also has connections from DC to abroad. Hmm, I'm sure he's well informed.

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: carewemust
NADLER and SCHIFF just issued a joint statement declaring the John Durham investigation Illegitimate, because Attorney General Barr is a partisan hack.

I guess that will bring Durham's Criminal probe of the Deep-State to an end.

Everybody can go home now. Nothing more to see here!

So to be fair...Schiff's investigation is illegitimate because he is a partisan hack.

Prove me wrong.

Barr is investigating an actual crime and uncovering evidence in the process. Legitimate.

Schiff is searching for evidence in hopes of finding a crime. Illegitimate.

Barr is In charge of all things law enforcement at the Federal level and takes his oath of office serious. Legitimate.

Schiff is prone to lying repeatedly and soils his oath of office each day he arrives to work. Illegitimate.

So well said. Thanks for the reminder.

My weary mind sometimes fails to see the salient points.

Thank you

Quite possibly Donald Jr's best tweet ever. Wonder if Dad had his phone?


[image removed...profanity]

twitter

a reply to: crankyoldman
So I am looking at the actual data from the poll.
www.campaignforfreespeech.org...

take a look at page 7 of it.

That is a story that media won't push.



Then page 11




There is no methodology listed in their documentation. Red Flag 1.
There is room for interpretation in the questions, such as "free speech does not cover shouting fire in a theater" skewing the results. Red Flag 2.
They use weighted numbers for respondents, without giving a methodology for this weighting or the source of information for their weighting. Red Flag 3.

Then to top it all off, only ONE of the results is published in media, while ignoring the one that shows a negative view of media and "fake news".

a reply to: pavil

He's graduated from apprentice to journeyman. 😎

I'll bet she's a member of one of those Swinger clubs or Snctm.

a reply to: imthegoat

Q would get posts removed by ATS on the Q thread, lol.

With that said; need 8kun back so Q can pick up where he/she/they left off.

Katie Hill is a piece of work. Like Q tells us often. They are stupid. No comms or opsec awareness by the black hats.

a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, all flavors of as you say horse# in this thread but I think the Mods prefer we hold a modicum of respect to our 'illustrious' leaders no matter who they are or what party affiliation. Least that's my take. I think they ignore it all in the mud-pit.

a reply to: crankyoldman

cranky, catching up, so apols if mentioned... there are further anomalies in the Colorado border tweet:

(Kiddingly) We’re building a Wall in Colorado”(then stated, “we’re not building a Wall in Kansas but they get the benefit of the Wall we’re building on the Border”) refered to people in the very packed auditorium, from Colorado & Kansas, getting the benefit of the Border Wall!

12:20 AM - 24 Oct 2019

1) No open quote character after (kiddingly),

2) Kiddingly could be the new LIDDLE reference to children?

3) No SPACE between Colorado"(then,

4) Emphasis on We're... 3 times... maybe he means WEIR which is a Dam? Are there any major 3 part dams?

5) refered... could this mean Reef RED? Maybe implies Australia... Great Barrier reef?

6) Colorado & Kansas = C&K... Calvin Klein?

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
44 Republicans sign onto Graham resolution condemning impeachment inquiry

List of GOP Senators who have not signed onto Lindsey's resolution.
Assume these are the human scum Trump tweeted about the other day.

Lamar Alexander
Susan Collins
Mike Enzi
Cory Gardner
Johnny Isakson
Lisa Murkowski
Pierre Delecto

How many are running this time? I think Alexander is retiring?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

What do you make of the Dominoes breakdown I get the feeling the date and time are in there somehow. The Q#2167 linked twit time is 11:55.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: imthegoat

Yes, all flavors of as you say horse# in this thread but I think the Mods prefer we hold a modicum of respect to our 'illustrious' leaders no matter who they are or what party affiliation. Least that's my take. I think they ignore it all in the mud-pit.

Why respect "leaders" when they have no respect for us?




Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
No Political Trolling.....either in words or images. Please read new thread.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

From my earlier post on Watkins update he left out "C", "K", "Q"
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Then yesterday he was writing in this journal which the cover had the CIC Seal.



He sent this out today.



Haven't watched his latest vid. IDK, just some odd synchronicities. Don't know if he's been signalling a message or just entertainment for the diehard 8kun fans.

Watkins Xerxes

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

She's gross....and I have pretty low standards.

a reply to: imthegoat

Have tried to post several times but...something goes wrong.

o short and sweet, my thoughts. We already know the guy is Eric Ciaramella and Bill Taylor likely his source.

Nothing is going to happen to him and he will likely get appointed to some NGO board for his efforts.

It is not like he is giving classified info...just some hear say that fits his agenda.

Particularly loved this quote

Everyone in D.C. is shadier than a thick forest.

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: imthegoat

Have tried to post several times but...something goes wrong.

o short and sweet, my thoughts. We already know the guy is Eric Ciaramella and Bill Taylor likely his source.

Nothing is going to happen to him and he will likely get appointed to some NGO board for his efforts.

It is not like he is giving classified info...just some hear say that fits his agenda.

Particularly loved this quote

Everyone in D.C. is shadier than a thick forest.

Fixed the above for you lol. And I agree that Bill Taylor is the primary source it seems.

a reply to: scraedtosleep
I agree, even the ones that are over scandals, and those are probably the minority, are not necessarily because of Q.

The other question is, is this uncommon? That is why I mentioned old numbers to compare to.

Dub or somethin

a reply to: crankyoldman

I yhink your spot on with the Dominoes but my brain is too drained to check the timestamps tonight... I WILL look at them in the morning.

Meanwhile, some observations on the dominoes picture

1) 7 pizzas on top shelf indicate a week?
2) Of the 7 the top 3 are bright blue packaging compared to rest = 1st or last 3 days of week Dem Booms?
3) a pile of 10 upturned cups = 10 days of darkness... because its dark under the cups because they're facing downwards?

Lower shelves could be signalling how many booms in following weeks?