Julian Assange: I Will Bring Hillary Down Before The Debate Stage On September 26th

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

Because I am a free woman.

I think it's fairly clear that some people are only too happy to buy the BS that any evidence that shames Clinton is false. Doesn't matter what it is, the trick is to cast doubt on it and leave an exit to escape punishment. Obvious tactic to create a free pass for Clinton's numerous crimes and corruption.

If you take this obvious tactic to the extreme a criminal caught on video and photographed doing the crime could just say - "It was the Russians - they used photoshop and a video editor". For some people this is enough because they are so invested. The same people will then accuse others that point out their folly that it's everyone else who is biased.

At this stage I can only pity people who are so lost because getting through to them is not possible.

a reply to: Indigo5

is that why Hillary Clinton's FBI investigation interview in regards to V Foster is now missing from the National Archives?

remember when Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton's National Security advisor, was convicted of stealing 9/11 documents related to Bill Clinton from the National Archives?


the Clinton MO.

originally posted by: UKTruth
I think it's fairly clear that some people are only too happy to buy the BS that any evidence that shames Clinton is false. Doesn't matter what it is, the trick is to cast doubt on it and leave an exit to escape punishment. Obvious tactic to create a free pass for Clinton's numerous crimes and corruption.

If you take this obvious tactic to the extreme a criminal caught on video and photographed doing the crime could just say - "It was the Russians - they used photoshop and a video editor".

How warped is that BS?

I don't care what Democrats "say" about evidence (leaked material)..or Ideologues that have hate for the accused (HRC or anyone else)

I care that the evidence is verified before accepting it as truth. MORE SO when originating with Russian Intelligence...as Multiple sources at the FBI are now confirming the DNC and now NYT and other hacks did.

The irony in your warped BS above is that while you attack those suggesting objective verification of evidence..

You simultaneously argue for accepting the veracity and truthfulness of leaked material that hasn't even been leaked yet! Just cuz Assange says it will hurt HRC.

It would be funny if it wasn't such a sadly ideologically retarded argument you are making.

Good lord, the Trump circle Jerk that continues in perpetuity on ATS is just over the top. Assange says the same damn thing every few weeks, S$&* or get off the pot already. I'm tired of seeing this dude in the news. If he's so worried about criminals why doesn't he come out of that Embassy and face those rape charges he's been hiding from? You all remind me of the Bernie Bros who prayed to the indictment fairy for the entirety of the primary and who also said....wait for it....Hillary will go down in a few weeks. You see what happened there...🙄

So - where is it???

This "Assange" pwn of Hillary?

tick

tock

tick

tock


yawn

One more pre leaky leaks thread to tire us all out.

When the real leaks come everyone will be, meh.

And if it is juicy their will suddenly appear a mass murder of children with assault rifles somewhere, in a mall, a church, a school.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.

Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?

Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.

of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's

But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.

it was already investigated....nada, nothing...by the way I worked for everything I have, but don't let that cloud up your fantasy world of anyone that doesn't think like you, must have received "handouts"

MY point made that you support a cold blooded killer still stands on it's own.

Actually it doesn't. It's premised on 20 year old, right-wing fantasy, ideological fiction porn, debunked BS..

SNIP Just pretend it is all right wing fantasy like you said.

Except everyone knows the truth.

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: amazing

If he was smart Assange would release all that he has, right now, before anything can stop him.

No, I think Assange is being smart about his release times. He released the DNC rigging scandal when it would get the most beneficial attention. Democrats would all be paying more attention due to the convention. Now, many Americans have lost their focus until the actual GE debates begin. At that time, it will be difficult to not take notice of what may be in the new release. Basically, bigger bang!

I agree, but a small part of me...very small part, wonders if there is something to the Clinton body count conspiracy. That causes me to worry about him dying before he releases.

a reply to: Vdogg

ahhh yes....criticize Hillary and you're automatically a Trump supporter. such a weak and lazy take.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth
I think it's fairly clear that some people are only too happy to buy the BS that any evidence that shames Clinton is false. Doesn't matter what it is, the trick is to cast doubt on it and leave an exit to escape punishment. Obvious tactic to create a free pass for Clinton's numerous crimes and corruption.

If you take this obvious tactic to the extreme a criminal caught on video and photographed doing the crime could just say - "It was the Russians - they used photoshop and a video editor".

How warped is that BS?

I don't care what Democrats "say" about evidence (leaked material)..or Ideologues that have hate for the accused (HRC or anyone else)

I care that the evidence is verified before accepting it as truth. MORE SO when originating with Russian Intelligence...as Multiple sources at the FBI are now confirming the DNC and now NYT and other hacks did.

The irony in your warped BS above is that while you attack those suggesting objective verification of evidence..

You simultaneously argue for accepting the veracity and truthfulness of leaked material that hasn't even been leaked yet! Just cuz Assange says it will hurt HRC.

It would be funny if it wasn't such a sadly ideologically retarded argument you are making.

One day I pray you will wake up. Genuinely.

a reply to: Konduit

I hope he is wearing military grade protection gear

ATTENTION PLEASE!

This is not the Mud Pit and the topic is not opinions of each other. Keep it up and it may lead to temporary Posting Ban's.

Please get back to the topic and debate it in a civil manner.

Do not reply to this message.

Thanks

At this point, they could leak proof that she point blank shot someone execution style in the back of the head and the press would find a way to explain why it really wasn't that big of a deal and then get back to pointing out why Trump's rhetoric is inspiring violence and we ought to burn him at the stake for that.

removed.

a reply to: ketsuko

You mean like how Trump said he could shoot somebody and not lose any voters?

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: ketsuko

You mean like how Trump said he could shoot somebody and not lose any voters?

Come on man, that was a figure of speech.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: ketsuko

You mean like how Trump said he could shoot somebody and not lose any voters?

Yeah but your forgetting something important.

Trump says stupid #. Hillary actually does it.

a reply to: Sublimecraft

I'm not religious but WTF , I will pray tonight just to be on the safe side for the FBI to actually prosecute her.

Hillary being forced to step aside would be a big blow to the corrupted system , IMO.

Even if that other conman Trump gets the POTUS position, he would be a step above her.

You can shame a Trump supporter for supporting someone that "says mean things".

But a Hillary supporter... your literally supporting a corrupt political cartel.