It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Julian Assange: I Will Bring Hillary Down Before The Debate Stage On September 26th

page: 6
121
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.


Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

I hope Assange enjoys his days.

I'm pretty sure he's going to be suicided before he can get that info out.

Threatening a Clinton.... wow ba**sy.
edit on 25-8-2016 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.


Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?


Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

If so, I wonder if it would force an investigation in some of those other deaths and remove the assumed coincidence defense.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 01:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.


Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?


Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.


of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 01:55 PM
link   
I guess the way quotes work is... if Julian says there will be more leaks... we can translate that to mean he literally said "I Will Bring Hillary Down Before The Debate Stage On September 26th"? Is that how quotes work? I always thought they had to be exactly what a person said... hence... the quotes.

To put things in perspective, here's an ACTUAL quote from Assange on this topic:



Asked if the data could be a game-changer in the election, the Australian told Fox News in an interview conducted by satellite: "I think it’s significant. You know, it depends on how it catches fire in the public and in the media.”

www.yahoo.com...

I know it's not as exciting as totally made up quotes, but there's still some value for people who appreciate facts and truth and all that lefty stuff.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:04 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:07 PM
link   
I am not so sure about the validity of the OP's interview and Assange saying she will "go down" because frankly doesn't sound like something he would say and the interviews he has had with other people via video isnt that incriminating. With that said I am anxious to hear what he has to say tonight...

On The Kelly File tonight will be part 2 and it's supposed to be better than part 1. He will talk about all of this below..



* The murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich

* His view of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump including the question of what he has on Trump and whether or not that could see the light of day (Ive wondered if he will be uncovering anything on Trump or if he's just out to get Hillary/Clinton's)

* The involvement of the his organization and the Russians in American politics including an assertion by him that the DNC leaks would not have seen the light of day if they were given to a news organization like the New York Times( RIGHT)

* Whether his organization is responsible for damaging material getting out (medical records, etc) and whether he feels and moral obligation to protect the innocent ensnared in some of the leaks coming from his group

* Why, exactly, he is holed up, which countries want him and why…plus the potential assassination attempt on his life earlier this week at the Ecuadorian embassy in London

And more Im sure... It will be interesting to watch for sure!



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.


Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?


Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.


of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's


But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.


it was already investigated....nada, nothing...by the way I worked for everything I have, but don't let that cloud up your fantasy world of anyone that doesn't think like you, must have received "handouts"



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.


Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?


Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.


of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's


But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.


it was already investigated....nada, nothing...by the way I worked for everything I have, but don't let that cloud up your fantasy world of anyone that doesn't think like you, must have received "handouts"


MY point made that you support a cold blooded killer still stands on it's own.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: UKTruth

If so, I wonder if it would force an investigation in some of those other deaths and remove the assumed coincidence defense.


If that happens I will renewed belief in God - it would have to be his hand at work.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5

why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.


Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?


Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.


of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's


But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.


it was already investigated....nada, nothing...by the way I worked for everything I have, but don't let that cloud up your fantasy world of anyone that doesn't think like you, must have received "handouts"


MY point made that you support a cold blooded killer still stands on it's own.


Actually it doesn't. It's premised on 20 year old, right-wing fantasy, ideological fiction porn, debunked BS..


(post by WeAreAWAKE removed for a manners violation)
(post by WeAreAWAKE removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   
When the people in power are corrupt and lie, cheat, steal, intimidate, kill and use all the wealth at their means to keep us down then what choice is there combat them? Just because something is illegal does not mean it's wrong and sometimes doing the right thing means breaking the law. Julian Assange is a hero as is Snowden. We should be congratulating our whistleblowers and journalists and leakers. It's the only thing keeping the corrupt in check and barely at that.

If he was smart Assange would release all that he has, right now, before anything can stop him.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Konduit

Here is the issue..

Assange is effectively working with and courting Russia now.

He wants out of his cubby-hole prison in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and Russia has already given Snowden a safe refuge. They are his best hope.

Meanwhile his last leak of the DNC Emails, which was poorly screened and edited before release...was clearly and indisputably given to him by Russian Intelligence Hackers.

That is not a political assessment...non-partisan, independent hackers and security firms have dug into the leaked material and literally found Russian Intelligence signatures on the docs that Russian Intelligence forgot to edit out before handing over to Assange.

Which leads us to the next leak...

Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies


Last month, a bipartisan group of 32 national security experts at the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group warned of a specific type of fakery following the DNC hack, arguing that the suspected Russian hackers who struck the DNC and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee could “salt the files they release with plausible forgeries.”


www.politico.com...

NOW...Of course anti-Hilary folks will say that is BS and the upcoming leaks are fully accurate if they scuttle her chances as an "October Surprise". And it's possible that the leaks will contain fabrications...or it's possible they will be true...

BUT...as far as the idea that the FBI and Justice can fully verify the leaks are not fabricated in parts? In time for the election? That won't happen. That is a huge undertaking to chase down the origin of the leaks and subpoena other peoples email records and review it all to make sure it is accurate.

So logically the timeline will not afford for verification of the leaks and verification will be absolutely a pre-requisite for any charges or indictment....more so when working with evidence provided by Russian Hackers aimed at messing with a US election.

Best case that Hillary haters can hope for is very bad headlines, but no..logically the timeline will not afford for any charges or indictments. The FBI wont be able to prove or disprove the content of the leak quickly enough given the nature and origin.

At this stage Russia can hand Assange anything they like, true or not, for leaking. He has no way to verify.


Why are you, the DNC and Hillary so afraid of the truth? If emails or documents are released and verifiable, regardless where they originated or who obtained them, why do you and your allies want the truth silenced? I have to assume that you have decided that your ideology is more important than truth. More important that right or justice and you people want it crushed. Not very American...not very honest.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 03:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: amazing

If he was smart Assange would release all that he has, right now, before anything can stop him.


No, I think Assange is being smart about his release times. He released the DNC rigging scandal when it would get the most beneficial attention. Democrats would all be paying more attention due to the convention. Now, many Americans have lost their focus until the actual GE debates begin. At that time, it will be difficult to not take notice of what may be in the new release. Basically, bigger bang!



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: LifeMode
Assange should make a statement that he will not release it if she drops out before X date. This creates an option for her to do the right thing. That way people will see that there was still hope for her party but she screwed them over and nuked everyone. If she can't have it nobody can sort of thing.


Nah, she has had enough chances. Take her psycho ass out of here.



posted on Aug, 25 2016 @ 03:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Konduit

Here is the issue..

Assange is effectively working with and courting Russia now.

He wants out of his cubby-hole prison in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and Russia has already given Snowden a safe refuge. They are his best hope.

Meanwhile his last leak of the DNC Emails, which was poorly screened and edited before release...was clearly and indisputably given to him by Russian Intelligence Hackers.

That is not a political assessment...non-partisan, independent hackers and security firms have dug into the leaked material and literally found Russian Intelligence signatures on the docs that Russian Intelligence forgot to edit out before handing over to Assange.

Which leads us to the next leak...

Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies


Last month, a bipartisan group of 32 national security experts at the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group warned of a specific type of fakery following the DNC hack, arguing that the suspected Russian hackers who struck the DNC and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee could “salt the files they release with plausible forgeries.”


www.politico.com...

NOW...Of course anti-Hilary folks will say that is BS and the upcoming leaks are fully accurate if they scuttle her chances as an "October Surprise". And it's possible that the leaks will contain fabrications...or it's possible they will be true...

BUT...as far as the idea that the FBI and Justice can fully verify the leaks are not fabricated in parts? In time for the election? That won't happen. That is a huge undertaking to chase down the origin of the leaks and subpoena other peoples email records and review it all to make sure it is accurate.

So logically the timeline will not afford for verification of the leaks and verification will be absolutely a pre-requisite for any charges or indictment....more so when working with evidence provided by Russian Hackers aimed at messing with a US election.

Best case that Hillary haters can hope for is very bad headlines, but no..logically the timeline will not afford for any charges or indictments. The FBI wont be able to prove or disprove the content of the leak quickly enough given the nature and origin.

At this stage Russia can hand Assange anything they like, true or not, for leaking. He has no way to verify.


Why are you, the DNC and Hillary so afraid of the truth?


Can't speak for "the DNC and Hillary" but personally I don't fear the truth, I seek it. Strange comment. Are you trolling?



If emails or documents are released and verifiable, regardless where they originated or who obtained them, why do you and your allies want the truth silenced?


Me "and my allies"?...Yes Trolling. "Verifiable" is the operative word above. For me "Verified" has to do with investigation and confirmation by independant and objective investigators. For you "Verifiable" obviously means anything that negatively portrays HRC.

We have different definitions of "truth" ..



I have to assume that you have decided that your ideology is more important than truth. More important that right or justice and you people want it crushed. Not very American...not very honest.


That qualifies as ironic comedy given the propaganda of Russian origin that you are selling.

The words "Truth", "Honesty" and "American" read with a greasy and rotting odor in your post.

I don't think I will entertain your trolling any more...my posts are full of links and evidence..They stand.




top topics



 
121
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join