It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5
why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.
Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5
why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.
Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?
Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.
Asked if the data could be a game-changer in the election, the Australian told Fox News in an interview conducted by satellite: "I think it’s significant. You know, it depends on how it catches fire in the public and in the media.”
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5
why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.
Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?
Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.
of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's
But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5
why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.
Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?
Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.
of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's
But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.
it was already investigated....nada, nothing...by the way I worked for everything I have, but don't let that cloud up your fantasy world of anyone that doesn't think like you, must have received "handouts"
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: boast
a reply to: Indigo5
why he wont release it now? last night on The Kelly Files interview, Julian said theyre in the midst of vetting the info.
Hmmmm....Maybe someone came forward to claim the reward on information of the DNC staffer Seth Rich's death?
Now THAT would be a story. Finally get evidence of murder tied to Clinton after all the strange coincidences.
of course...murder tied to Clinton.....actually I thought this tie-in would happen much sooner in this election cycle...Vince Foster ring a bell? the republican nuts already tried to bring them up on charges of murdering ole' Vince in the 90's
But you, on the other hand don't care if Clinton had Foster killed, or anyone else for that matter, as long as you get your free handouts, free phone, and other government programs keep delivering. Yes, we know.
it was already investigated....nada, nothing...by the way I worked for everything I have, but don't let that cloud up your fantasy world of anyone that doesn't think like you, must have received "handouts"
MY point made that you support a cold blooded killer still stands on it's own.
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Konduit
Here is the issue..
Assange is effectively working with and courting Russia now.
He wants out of his cubby-hole prison in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and Russia has already given Snowden a safe refuge. They are his best hope.
Meanwhile his last leak of the DNC Emails, which was poorly screened and edited before release...was clearly and indisputably given to him by Russian Intelligence Hackers.
That is not a political assessment...non-partisan, independent hackers and security firms have dug into the leaked material and literally found Russian Intelligence signatures on the docs that Russian Intelligence forgot to edit out before handing over to Assange.
Which leads us to the next leak...
Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies
Last month, a bipartisan group of 32 national security experts at the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group warned of a specific type of fakery following the DNC hack, arguing that the suspected Russian hackers who struck the DNC and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee could “salt the files they release with plausible forgeries.”
www.politico.com...
NOW...Of course anti-Hilary folks will say that is BS and the upcoming leaks are fully accurate if they scuttle her chances as an "October Surprise". And it's possible that the leaks will contain fabrications...or it's possible they will be true...
BUT...as far as the idea that the FBI and Justice can fully verify the leaks are not fabricated in parts? In time for the election? That won't happen. That is a huge undertaking to chase down the origin of the leaks and subpoena other peoples email records and review it all to make sure it is accurate.
So logically the timeline will not afford for verification of the leaks and verification will be absolutely a pre-requisite for any charges or indictment....more so when working with evidence provided by Russian Hackers aimed at messing with a US election.
Best case that Hillary haters can hope for is very bad headlines, but no..logically the timeline will not afford for any charges or indictments. The FBI wont be able to prove or disprove the content of the leak quickly enough given the nature and origin.
At this stage Russia can hand Assange anything they like, true or not, for leaking. He has no way to verify.
originally posted by: amazing
If he was smart Assange would release all that he has, right now, before anything can stop him.
originally posted by: LifeMode
Assange should make a statement that he will not release it if she drops out before X date. This creates an option for her to do the right thing. That way people will see that there was still hope for her party but she screwed them over and nuked everyone. If she can't have it nobody can sort of thing.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Konduit
Here is the issue..
Assange is effectively working with and courting Russia now.
He wants out of his cubby-hole prison in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and Russia has already given Snowden a safe refuge. They are his best hope.
Meanwhile his last leak of the DNC Emails, which was poorly screened and edited before release...was clearly and indisputably given to him by Russian Intelligence Hackers.
That is not a political assessment...non-partisan, independent hackers and security firms have dug into the leaked material and literally found Russian Intelligence signatures on the docs that Russian Intelligence forgot to edit out before handing over to Assange.
Which leads us to the next leak...
Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies
Last month, a bipartisan group of 32 national security experts at the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group warned of a specific type of fakery following the DNC hack, arguing that the suspected Russian hackers who struck the DNC and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee could “salt the files they release with plausible forgeries.”
www.politico.com...
NOW...Of course anti-Hilary folks will say that is BS and the upcoming leaks are fully accurate if they scuttle her chances as an "October Surprise". And it's possible that the leaks will contain fabrications...or it's possible they will be true...
BUT...as far as the idea that the FBI and Justice can fully verify the leaks are not fabricated in parts? In time for the election? That won't happen. That is a huge undertaking to chase down the origin of the leaks and subpoena other peoples email records and review it all to make sure it is accurate.
So logically the timeline will not afford for verification of the leaks and verification will be absolutely a pre-requisite for any charges or indictment....more so when working with evidence provided by Russian Hackers aimed at messing with a US election.
Best case that Hillary haters can hope for is very bad headlines, but no..logically the timeline will not afford for any charges or indictments. The FBI wont be able to prove or disprove the content of the leak quickly enough given the nature and origin.
At this stage Russia can hand Assange anything they like, true or not, for leaking. He has no way to verify.
Why are you, the DNC and Hillary so afraid of the truth?
If emails or documents are released and verifiable, regardless where they originated or who obtained them, why do you and your allies want the truth silenced?
I have to assume that you have decided that your ideology is more important than truth. More important that right or justice and you people want it crushed. Not very American...not very honest.