It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These prisoners have been imprisoned in such a way that their legs and necks are fixed, forcing them to gaze at a wall in front of them, unable to move their heads. Behind the prisoners is a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway.
Along this walkway is a low wall, behind which people walk carrying objects "...including figures of men and animals made of wood, stone and other materials.". In this way, the walking people are compared to puppeteers and the low wall to the screen over which puppeteers display their puppets.
Since these walking people are behind the wall on the walkway, their bodies do not cast shadows on the wall faced by the prisoners, but the objects they carry do. The prisoners cannot see any of this behind them, being only able to view the shadows cast upon the wall in front of them. There are also echoes off the shadowed wall of sounds the people walking on the road sometimes make, which the prisoners falsely believe are caused by the shadows.
Socrates suggests that, for the prisoners, the shadows of artifacts would constitute reality. They would not realize that what they see are shadows of the artifacts, which are themselves inspired by real humans and animals outside of the cave.
Furthermore, the prisoners would "assign credit and prestige" to whomever among them could quickly remember which shadows came before, predict which shadows would follow and name which shadows were normally found together.
Departure from the Cave
Klassified
reply to post by The GUT
I haven't read the whole thread yet, GUT. But if I may toss out a thought...
Why does Vallee hesitate to be "too specific?"
Because being too specific lets the cat out of the bag, and skews the test of the control system. If you are trying to subtly goad someone into acting, or reacting, you don't tell them how you are doing it. Especially if you are trying to "infiltrate" a system using it's own feedback. Hopefully that made sense.
nugget1
Are we not born into the heart of a control system? Our life cycle is automatically controlled, and scientist work fervently to discover how to override it.
Our pineal gland is suspect of having access to the 'control panel', so anything used to block its function would keep us from discovering the source.
Are some factions trying to block our access to the mainframe?
Willtell
The primary control system that rules or misrules humans is his twisted mind.
A mind so f up that any alien culture would be crazier than us to communicate with us directly.
All this talk about trickster is another external delusional devil theory
The real trickster is the human inclination to self deception.
A few untwisted minded people have come from time to time to warn us of THIS: Krishna, LaoTzu, Buddha, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, etc., that this twisted mind can be cultivated into an untwisted state where we can become humans who won’t erect weapons of mass murder and will feed children in the earth who starve to death rather than letting Bill Gates accumulate 80BILLION DOLLARS!
Valllee is a nice guy but an intellectual snob who thinks that “science’ can figure everything out.
Perhaps it should save us since it is science that has created the means to destroy us.
But it won't and can’t save us, why? And it isn’t being used, as it should, to feed the whole world, why?
So the very leaders we have elected are still stuck with super twisted minds and souls so NOTHING GETS DONE.
lostgirl
reply to post by lostgirl
To follow-up...
I want to express that I feel there are (at least) two control systems...
Just for ease of reference: the governmental one and the supernatural one
My 'leanings' are that the governmental 'system is being 'driven' by the supernatural one...
ICSs [Industrial Control Systems] are typically used in industries such as electrical, water, oil, gas and data. Based on data received from remote stations, automated or operator-driven supervisory commands can be pushed to remote station control devices, which are often referred to as field devices. Field devices control local operations such as opening and closing valves and breakers, collecting data from sensor systems, and monitoring the local environment for alarm conditions
Autograf
nugget1
Are we not born into the heart of a control system? Our life cycle is automatically controlled, and scientist work fervently to discover how to override it.
Our pineal gland is suspect of having access to the 'control panel', so anything used to block its function would keep us from discovering the source.
Are some factions trying to block our access to the mainframe?
In the post around page 45 that describes in detail the industrial control systems which JV based his model on, it points out that an always-on connection to the mainframe (HMI, human-machine-interface, what have you) is a prerequisite for the appropriate systems monitoring and possible response.
This connection may be 'firewalled' in a way. I think that's what you're getting at if I understand correctly. Interesting sidetrack.
Autograf
There is this common misconception which has driven this thread off topic into paranoia countless times already.
Vallee was using a very specific meaning of the phrase "control system", not referring to Big Brother:
So you see our task is even more difficult: how can a field device even operate outside the constraints designed for it by the operators?
Autograf
So you see our task is even more difficult: how can a field device even operate outside the constraints designed for it by the operators?
Autograf
reply to post by lostgirl
I'm afraid we're still talking about an overly simplistic view of the idea of a control system, one where we do understand all the parameters and can comprehend the overall - as with society's feedback loops.
In the case of the UFO phenomenon, even if we accept JV's control system model, we're still completely unsure which parameters are being controlled!
This is not about docile humans, nowhere near as simple as an example of government's industrial-type controls: "If citizens don't pay enough taxes, threaten them with lots of stories in the newspaper about tax dodgers, in order to return tax collection levels to a normal level". We have little idea what JV's controllers are even aiming for.
reply to post by Autograf
I'm afraid we're still talking about an overly simplistic view of the idea of a control system, one where we do understand all the parameters and can comprehend the overall
Autograf
reply to post by lostgirl
Pretty sure we're chasing our tails at this point. Semantics are important, though. The precise meaning of the language JV used seems to escape a lot of the casual readers.
KellyPrettyBear
reply to post by lostgirl
Layoff the booze