reply to post by burntheships
Not a problem, I thought I should at least let you know the chronological order so you had a better grasp of how it all happened. I am not at all
surprised that her and her husband both believe she was being spoken to and instructed by the Holy Spirit... and that the outburst was
uncharacteristic of her. There is something more to this event, I won't jump automatically onto the MK Ultra bandwagon, but it does give one
With James Holmes we were also discussing MK Ultra and it's possible use in that case. If it were something of that nature, it was discussed, that
"they" need time to weasel their way into the subject's subconscious mind, allowing him to amass the weaponry, plan the attack and even how he
surrendered. Then we have Adam Lanza and all that "investigation" entailed. Finally we have Aaron Alexis from the D.C. Navy Yard shooting. Now all
of these examples I am using are ones that involved horrific acts that resulted in the loss of innocent lives, that is not
where the comparison
comes in for use of MK Ultra or some other such mind control/hypnosis, stay with me here...
In the previous three events, there were widespread rumors of 2nd and even 3rd gunmen involved. The stories of accomplices ran for hours while these
mystery accomplices were searched for. In fact, recent evidence from the Holmes trial put testimony by an Aurora police officer who questioned Holmes
at the scene said that
smirked when asked if he had an accomplice
, even though he readily answered and even expanded on his answers to all other questions. We didn't
find out any other details from Lanza or Alexis because they were killed at the scene, Holmes is the only one alive to give us any insight (which I'm
sure will be very minimal if any more at all).
So my question, did we finally get video evidence of the "trigger person" using trigger words or body language?! Is that what these other "gunmen"
were, trigger re-layers?! If, big IF
there were these accomplices, they would have had to spend some time with the perpetrators in order to
mold their minds so to speak, giving them a level of comfort around said person. Is that what we're seeing? Someone(s) Diane was familiar with and
comfortable enough around to hold this pre-rant conversation?!
Just my thoughts as of right now... I return you to your regularly scheduled thread. Sorry for the slight derailment OP.