It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The law of common sense is so hard for some:
Originally posted by Fromabove
The inability to observe it, the math against it, makes it impossible. Time is even against evolution.
And lastly, evolution theory takes the notion that it is always modifying and making organisms more perfect through each change. This is a bias.
But, seeing that evolution is basically the work of imagination and not much more, it doesn't really matter.
Ah, the fun of looking at the silly theory of evolution and seeing the emperor has no clothes despite everyone pretending he does
Originally posted by UnifiedSerenity
reply to post by stormson
You see, that is amazing that rather than deal with the arguments made showing the problems with the theory of macro evolution not being proved you want us to prove God. We are not teaching creation by God in public schools, but you are teaching the belief in evolution as fact when it has not been proved.
Macro evolution is based on faith alone and not on science. It is not observable and it is not proved via the fossil record no matter how many times you claim it is. Circular arguments are used to defend it and yet you have no problem with them.
Originally posted by UnifiedSerenity
reply to post by LightOrange
They are still salamanders and not a new kind. That does not prove common ancestry though you want to believe it does.
Now, if we can get adaption to the point that we're crossing the salamander's species boundaries for survival... what stops it from crossing to other reptiles? And past reptiles? What is stopping it? God?
Originally posted by UnifiedSerenity
Ah, the fun of looking at the silly theory of evolution and seeing the emperor has no clothes despite everyone pretending he does:
Originally posted by UnifiedSerenity
reply to post by stormson
You see, that is amazing that rather than deal with the arguments made showing the problems with the theory of macro evolution not being proved you want us to prove God. We are not teaching creation by God in public schools, but you are teaching the belief in evolution as fact when it has not been proved.
Macro evolution is based on faith alone and not on science. It is not observable and it is not proved via the fossil record no matter how many times you claim it is. Circular arguments are used to defend it and yet you have no problem with them.
source
Nabuquduriuzhur
Unlike most, I have a degree in conservation biology (they renamed it after turning people off with “environmental education”— wish they’d renamed it before I graduated), one in geology, and two in engineering. The assumptions in evolution ultimately come down to 1. Something from nothing, 2. Magic, 3. Ignore erosion and other natural processes.
Cosmology became a religion some years back when they came up with the non-physics idea of universes popping out of literally nothing. Any time you get something from nothing, that demands a creator God. There’s no scientific explanation that works. So a dozen or so random amino acids from lightning in ammonia (which also creates some really nasty compounds) magically assembled themselves into thousands of structures each requiring thousands or millions of chemical building blocks in a cell in order for it to work? That’s nuts. The cell doesn’t work without such organization and it can’t happen randomly. Particularly when you consider that most of the chemicals involved require life to create them to start with.
Its astounding how many scientists ignore what happens in the field. Having seen 8″ of soil develop in 20 years, it makes me laugh when I see 3 inches per 1,000 years, which wouldn’t even keep up with erosion. The same with rocks eroding in 10, 20, 30 years requiring millions of years. Evolution is the triumph of hope over science.
So a dozen or so random amino acids from lightning in ammonia (which also creates some really nasty compounds) magically assembled themselves into thousands of structures each requiring thousands or millions of chemical building blocks in a cell in order for it to work? That’s nuts. The cell doesn’t work without such organization and it can’t happen randomly.
Its astounding how many scientists ignore what happens in the field. Having seen 8″ of soil develop in 20 years, it makes me laugh when I see 3 inches per 1,000 years, which wouldn’t even keep up with erosion. The same with rocks eroding in 10, 20, 30 years requiring millions of years. Evolution is the triumph of hope over science.
Evolution Vs. God
Originally posted by redoubt
Evolution Vs. God
The biggest curiosity here is that there is no real need for there to be any division between creation and evolution. This little war is something we have invented for our own personal enjoyment.
None of us; none at all, were there when we supposedly either fell from a tree and learned to walk upright... or was created in a garden called Eden. We base our positions on either ancient texts or incomplete contemporary science... with faith being the backbone of both.
Why do we choose this battle?
That is a good question because there is as much evidence that both could meld together as there are theories of why they don't.
Theories... we weren't there. Not the person in the lab, not the priest, not the preacher, not the science guy on TV. But... somehow, we have garnered enough arrogance to think that we have all the answers and from that spot, we presume to inflict ourselves on everyone else.
Yeah... just like that and it is not just one side that plays this horrid little game.
Evolution vs. God.
How about this one - idiots vs. fools?
Two pennies... that is what it costs to speak one's opinion and it pretty much puts a value on what we think we know.
Originally posted by redoubt
Evolution Vs. God
The biggest curiosity here is that there is no real need for there to be any division between creation and evolution. This little war is something we have invented for our own personal enjoyment.
None of us; none at all, were there when we supposedly either fell from a tree and learned to walk upright... or was created in a garden called Eden. We base our positions on either ancient texts or incomplete contemporary science... with faith being the backbone of both.
Why do we choose this battle?
That is a good question because there is as much evidence that both could meld together as there are theories of why they don't.
Theories... we weren't there. Not the person in the lab, not the priest, not the preacher, not the science guy on TV. But... somehow, we have garnered enough arrogance to think that we have all the answers and from that spot, we presume to inflict ourselves on everyone else.
Yeah... just like that and it is not just one side that plays this horrid little game.
Evolution vs. God.
How about this one - idiots vs. fools?
Two pennies... that is what it costs to speak one's opinion and it pretty much puts a value on what we think we know.
Other religions have their unique creation mythologies as well, should we also teach those in public schools?
Originally posted by redoubt
Evolution Vs. God
The biggest curiosity here is that there is no real need for there to be any division between creation and evolution. This little war is something we have invented for our own personal enjoyment.
None of us; none at all, were there when we supposedly either fell from a tree and learned to walk upright... or was created in a garden called Eden. We base our positions on either ancient texts or incomplete contemporary science... with faith being the backbone of both.
Why do we choose this battle?
That is a good question because there is as much evidence that both could meld together as there are theories of why they don't.
Theories... we weren't there. Not the person in the lab, not the priest, not the preacher, not the science guy on TV. But... somehow, we have garnered enough arrogance to think that we have all the answers and from that spot, we presume to inflict ourselves on everyone else.
Yeah... just like that and it is not just one side that plays this horrid little game.
Evolution vs. God.
How about this one - idiots vs. fools?
Two pennies... that is what it costs to speak one's opinion and it pretty much puts a value on what we think we know.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Blarneystoner
Other religions have their unique creation mythologies as well, should we also teach those in public schools?
We do. There's a certain point at which almost every class delves into religion, because religion is a huge part of literature and art and war and exploration and history. Just because you're afraid of your kids catching the god bug, doesn't mean their education should suffer for it. If anything, you should let them learn everything they can so that they can at least make an informed decision in the matter.
Otherwise, you're just as bad as the Christian parents who refuse to let their kids learn anything other than Christian stuff.