It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The 'newbies' here all seem to think this is a right leaning site because everyone is talking about how corrupt the Obama administration is (and it iS!). But the newbies don't realize the fact that, during the Bush43 years, all the threads were exposing his insanity ... and ....
the Christie administration
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The 'newbies' here all seem to think this is a right leaning site because everyone is talking about how corrupt the Obama administration is (and it iS!). But the newbies don't realize the fact that, during the Bush43 years, all the threads were exposing his insanity ... and ....
and the same folks that freak out about Obama on a daily basis were championing GW Bush...I know it is trendy to claim otherwise, but history shows different.
Christie being better than Hillary is like saying that a sucking chest wound is better than a subdural haematoma!
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by FlyersFan
the Christie administration
Yikes !!
But I think your prediction is correct.
Maybe the key slogan will be "Christie is better that Hillary"
Yikes !!
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by FlyersFan
the Christie administration
Yikes !! But I think your prediction is correct.
Oh dude. You were WRONG. Deal with it.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by FlyersFan
the Christie administration
Yikes !! But I think your prediction is correct.
Read my thread - Here come the ChristieCrats
It'll scare the stuff'n out of you. When Christie gets in ... and I do believe he will ... we'll all have plenty of Christie corruption to talk about. Geeeze .. his big financial backers are Soros and Rahm Emannuel. YIKES!
Originally posted by Indigo5
Hating on Moderate Republicans doesn't mean you are non-partisan or objective...
It actually means you are so far right that a Moderate Republican is as distasteful as a Moderate Democrat...
Originally posted by AlienScience
reply to post by FlyersFan
Oh dude. You were WRONG. Deal with it.
I'm not sure how you can claim I was wrong when you weren't in the conversation I was referring to.
Did I say anything about Obama? I am talking about right wing talking points and opinions. If you can't see that this website is full of them, I think you may be blind.
Most of the topics in the political forum would fit right in on Rush Limbaugh's show or on Fox News. Do you not notice that the sources that are used are often right leaning sources? Brietbart? The Blaze? The Daily Caller?
I may be a newbie, but sometimes fresh eyes can see things that older eyes can't because they have become so accustomed to things that it is "normal" for them.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by AlienScience
Posts that expose the Obama administrations corruption are correct.
And you don't find it a bit unusual for sites like Mediamatters, HuffPo, etc. NOT to carry topical stories about the president?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by AlienScience
Posts that expose the Obama administrations corruption are correct. It's corrupt to the bone. O-bots don't like that and whine that it's all from FOX or Brietbart or the Blaze .. but the fact is that Obama and his minions and his administration is corrupt. Truth is truth.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by AlienScience
Posts that expose the Obama administrations corruption are correct.
If that's what they did...
Shall we scope through the petty-wacko littering history of Political Madness? Starting with Born in Kenya?
It's the veracity of the claims that fails on a forum once known for Denying Ignorance...