I read all the pages in this thread and I didn't see this posted, forgive me if I missed it and am repeating info. This is an article from Doug
Hagmann relating to the embassy closings due to threat, the Arab Spring, and Benghazi.
"First, it is important to understand that the so-called Arab Spring did not start on December 18, 2010 as a spontaneous revolutionary wave of
demonstrations by people to rid themselves from the shackles of governmental oppression. It was planned many years ago by the globalist power brokers,
with the latest incarnations perhaps sketched out in the bowels of a Saudi mansion or an estate owned by a cabal of central bankers, partly to change
the geopolitical power structure of the Middle East, and partly as a “jobs program” for the military-industrial complex... It should be clear that
the Arab Spring, including the NATO action taken against Gaddafi’s Libya followed by the rebels attacks against Assad, is part of a globalist agenda
rather than a spontaneous uprising that has become the official historical narrative for the naive... It is vital to understand that the embassy
closures are a signal of the rapidly escalated intervention in the region by the US. It is a modern day equivalent to the Bay of Pigs, except Barack
Hussein Obama is no John F. Kennedy. Those old enough might recall that the CIA trained and inserted a group of “freedom fighters” into Cuba to
oust Castro. Exactly like the rebels in Syria, those fighters could never overthrow Castro without direct U.S. military intervention and assistance.
The situation is exactly the same in Syria today. We are watching brinkmanship at multiple levels on a global chess board. We have done much to
destabilize whatever relative peace might have existed in the Middle East through our actions at the hands of our globalist power brokers. Russia,
Iran, Syria and China are not amused, and are not looking the other way. The time clock for the anti-Assad rebels is quickly running out. This
administration and every elected official who has signed on to do the work of the Saudis and their handlers have painted us into a corner from which
there is little hope for escape. We cannot trust anything we are being told, and nothing we are being told even remotely approaches the truth. We are
seeing the beginnings of the transformation from a cold war to a hot war at the nation-state level. We are about to see a trigger event, after which
nothing will be the same."
My personal opinion is that this new terror threat is acting as a distraction for the attention the CIA is getting the past couple days about their
activities during the Benghazi attack. The fact that dozens of CIA agents were on the ground and in the area of the consulate seems to suggest to me
that this was not some random attack or that our people were caught off guard. The fact they were in the area and were told to stand down multiple
times says to me that the ambassador was supposed to die, and most likely anyone else who had knowledge of the activities in Benghazi and the arms
running to militant organizations. I believe this is why they originally tried to frame it as an attack by random insurgents upset over the Muhammed
video. The fact the CIA were heavily in the area and the gun running aspect have become mainstream news the past few days, right before this terror
As far as the recent threat goes, I agree with many of the posters here that something does not seem right. Yemen has been a hotbed for AQAP
recruitment and has become a major battleground, so to speak, at least since the targeting and murder of Anwar al-Awlaki and his son. I find it
interesting that they've issued this warning but mostly that they've closed all embassies in the Mid East. It does seem to foreshadow a big event,
possibly war. And that the "senior" AQAP terrorists were negligent enough to talk over open lines they would almost certainly know are being tapped is
quite strange to me.
I'm of the mind that most of the Islamic terrorist originations are under some sort of operational control that stems from the US/UK, not that there
isn't legitimate Middle East citizens upset over US imperialism and have decided to fight back with terrorist tactics, so that infamous phrase False
Flag certainly comes to mind. It has been much too long from the globalist stand point since Americans have been scared straight as we were after
9/11, and it's quite obvious we are getting tired of the liberty loss and the national security states surveillance of us. I believe something big is
in the works in order to facilitate consent.
Someone mentioned that Homs is close to being taken by Assads forces, which would be a huge loss for the US and the Syrian "rebels" backers. We could
possibly see an event that would justify from the federal governments stand point an invasion or escalation of the "low intensity conflict" now taking
place in Syria. I've always believed Assad must be taken out and control of Syria must be established before an attack on Iran can take place. With
the Iranian elections I suppose there is hope for positive change but I seriously doubt it.
edit on 4-8-2013 by PatriotGames2 because: (no