It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, who really wants a serious discussion, and what does that mean?
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by FuZe7
I did all of this because I don't believe that everyone is special and that we're all winners.
Originally posted by seabag
How about we STOP talking about race for a while and maybe we'll find there is no problem!
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Originally posted by seabag
How about we STOP talking about race for a while and maybe we'll find there is no problem!
Nuff Said
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by undo
I responded but then realized there just wasn't any point in my response that I cared to make.edit on 17-7-2013 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by undo
It was my response I was unhappy with.
I don't think there's going to be a race war. I don't play what if games like that.
I serve with people from many different races in the army. They are all my brothers and sisters.
I simply can't think like that.
what is there to discuss about race ?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by sonnny1
I remember in the Zimmerman trial (and no, I'm not making this about Zimmerman) witnesses testified to how much love he showed Black children, and a Black man wrongly accused. (For that matter, his Black High School prom date.) Could it be that he influenced those lives by the example of love and concern he was showing? Is that the path we are called to walk, regardless of risk to ourselves?
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by charles1952
In a way, the solution to wiping out bigotry was, perhaps without the author's intent, outlined in a book " Getting to Yes", by Fisher and Ury. Very simply, to come to agreements between two parties, they should focus on interests, not positions. Almost all conflict in the world today, results from parties standing by conflicting "positions". Positions are immutable, and when two parties stand by conflicting positions, no agreement can follow. By concentrating on interests, solutions to problems can be found that satisfy both parties. This is a rather simple concept, but one that politicians don't seem to understand, or are unwilling to adapt to. Of course, the media is culpable in maintaining racial tensions, as it viewership and readership are of paramount importance.
Rather than trying to bring people together, the current environment in our country is to keep the racial tension at a high level, because they believe that it will bring in the votes, and the votes result in maintaining power, and the resultant spoils of power.
In simple terms, the media, special interests, and politicians fan the fire of racial tension. It certainly does not take a genius to see that.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by charles1952
Can we start by talking about the importance of the individual over whatever phenotypic group he/she resembles?
Individuals have merit.
Individuals have things to offer.
When we categorise, then we begin to speak in generalities. We look at the "average". The "mean".
Many feel more comfortable within a category. (There is safety in numbers) And tend to act accordingly when within a certain category or group.
Being an individual means stepping out of a comfort zone and having to take responsibility for your (the individual) actions.
Perhaps people are just too afraid to be a single individual.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by charles1952
My only question is this: why would you embrace a language and behavior that is known to cause economic hardship, then complain because your opportunities are limited? Poor English is a key indicator to an employer that you may lack the insight needed to do a job, unless you don't speak English as a first language.