It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OpenEars123
Yes, i have spoken to many. Why would anyone 'choose' to be frowned upon and even hated by millions?edit on 29/5/13 by OpenEars123 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BO XIAN
Originally posted by OpenEars123
Yes, i have spoken to many. Why would anyone 'choose' to be frowned upon and even hated by millions?edit on 29/5/13 by OpenEars123 because: (no reason given)
INDEED. As have I.
I have a lot of compassion for such blokes wanting to create a warm fuzzy accepting home supportive of their feelings, inclinations, activities etc. Who wouldn't.
However, in my experience of many such folks . . . they have more or less given up trying to forsake their orientation and decided to go full bore the other way as the only option left to them. That's pretty sad, to me.
It's as though they are trying to recreate an Ozzie and Harriet nest . . . yet the 'marital bed' is a revolving door.
Such contradictions just do not work--and certainly not well.
Originally posted by LexiconV
You're funny... So you will acknowledge, by your religious beliefs/standards, the marriage between any male and female at face value, as being a covenant between them and god for the purpose of procreation ? That's stand up comedy for atheists and people getting married past the age of being able to procreate. People I know get married to have a life together regardless of each other's religious beliefs yet more for the fact that it legitimizes their relationship within society and gives legal rights to the individuals involved.
Too often Gay people get labeled as promiscuous by judgemental religious people yet there they are... gay couples attempting to validate their relationships within the framework of the term 'marriage' and still the god folk want to deny them that credibility. As I see it since we live in a democratic society... views that represent oppression, bigotry and intolerance based on fundamental religious beliefs would be perfectly suited within an Islamic state like Iran.
Sorry but your beliefs have little to do with the reasons many people chose to unite their lives under the term of marriage.
Originally posted by OpenEars123
... Although i wouldn't say that gay people 'give up' trying to be straight, it's more about accepting who they are.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
Originally posted by OpenEars123
... Although i wouldn't say that gay people 'give up' trying to be straight, it's more about accepting who they are.
Accepting 'who they ARE' . . . or
--who they have bought into as who they are?
--accepting a layered on externally as well as an internal set of dopamine enhanced conditioned reflexes defining "who they are?"
--accepting a political, propagandized and propagandizing lobbying group defining who they are based on their dopamine enhanced reflex set?
imho, it still boils down to trying to set up an Ozzie and Harriet home life . . .
--without Harriet
--without monogamy
--without stability
--with health hazardous habits
--with a list of other hindrances to long term fulfilling stable relationships.
And then pretending ALL THAT IS THE SAME as Ozzie and Harriet--when it's anything but.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
Originally posted by OpenEars123
... Although i wouldn't say that gay people 'give up' trying to be straight, it's more about accepting who they are.
Accepting 'who they ARE' . . . or
--who they have bought into as who they are?
--accepting a layered on externally as well as an internal set of dopamine enhanced conditioned reflexes defining "who they are?"
--accepting a political, propagandized and propagandizing lobbying group defining who they are based on their dopamine enhanced reflex set?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Very simple question here. It is simple logic that gay marriage cannot and will not effect any person outside of that particular relationship. It cannot effect my marriage. It cannot effect yours.
With that in mind, I have to ask:
What is so scary about gay marriage? Fear is literally the only reason that people are against it (whether it be religious fear, social fear, etc). There is no other logical reason.
So, again, I ask: What is so scary about gay marriage?
\
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Last I checked the research:
1. the brain anomalies associated with homosexuality--which came first--the behavior and then the brain conformed to the behaviors, thoughts, inclinations or vice versa. Research has yet to sort that out, imho.
2. Even counting all the POSSIBLE indications of hormonal, genetic etc. PREDISPOSING FACTORS toward homosexuality--all together those factors only account--at most--for 20% of the variance (some researchers say only 10%) resulting in homosexuality. If you are going to throw the issues out in such a discussion--in the name of science, [color=CC9966]then PLEASE AT LEAST GET THE SCIENCE CORRECT! Sheesh.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
imho, it still boils down to trying to set up an Ozzie and Harriet home life . . .
--without Harriet
--without monogamy
--without stability
--with health hazardous habits
--with a list of other hindrances to long term fulfilling stable relationships.
And then pretending ALL THAT IS THE SAME as Ozzie and Harriet--when it's anything but.
Originally posted by kickstart
The word has meant alot to many on a high level. To them its about family and kids. If you marry to not have kids it's just the tittle but to many it's not. Make up a word for gay marriage that means gay marriage or call it just that "gay marriage" but don't try to change the meaning of a specific word that has meant so much to so many. Why should hundreds of millions of people change a long standing/spiritual word to suit a group outside that word.
Originally posted by VelvetSplash
Originally posted by kickstart
The word has meant alot to many on a high level. To them its about family and kids. If you marry to not have kids it's just the tittle but to many it's not. Make up a word for gay marriage that means gay marriage or call it just that "gay marriage" but don't try to change the meaning of a specific word that has meant so much to so many. Why should hundreds of millions of people change a long standing/spiritual word to suit a group outside that word.
Nothing is changing for you - your marriage will not change, at all. And as for not having kids, so many gay men and women have children - they're not infertile you know!
On the subject of: By your reasoning, I assume you would also like infertile heterosexual people to either a) not be allowed to marry, or b) have their marriage called something else like "a barren marriage" so as to preserve your holy union of a breedable man/woman pairing.