posted on Jan, 3 2013 @ 07:31 PM
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
It's no use going back and forth with them. They have no interest in watching Unlawful Killing, so they aren't going to see the former MI-6 agent
discussing how bright flashes are used to disable a driver's eyesight among other things.
Those who are here to derail have found your weakness, which is how MI-6 is trained and how they carry out their duties. Nobody, unless they're on
the inside, know absolute specifics about how they work, so you can't win this debate and anything you say will never be good enough for them.
The fact that the video was shelved also means that nobody will be able to provide concrete proof that her reproductive organs were removed. From the
video, it states this, but it also states that these organs were flooded with formaldahyde, so it would be impossible to discover after the fact if
she was indeed pregnant.
If people are satisfied with the official story, they've said their piece and should abandon the thread so the rest of us who aren't satisfied with
how the royal court conducted business can entertain ourselves with other possibilities. There's never anything wrong with digging to make sure all
the bases were covered, but in this instance, those with eyes to see and ears to hear know that things aren't right here.