It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You seem to be fairly prideful of your wiki-knowledge of the UK security services. I don't need to know the ins and outs of how they structure themselves to know they are racist scumbags and killers.
Wasn't it the loon David Shaylar who told about the Increment and now you are peddling this factoid? But I digress.
I am not interested in the details
Originally posted by ipsedixit
I've seen the documentary Unlawful Killing. It is an excellent documentary that sticks very close to facts and to documents revealed during the inquest into Princess Diana's death. It is out there on the internet and can be found with a little diligence. There is a link to it earlier in the thread but I saw it at another location and didn't have to web surf in Russian to do it.
The key point of the film is that the jury at the inquest vindicated Mohammed al Fayad and brought in the most severe decision that the judge would allow them to bring, that of "unlawful killing", an equivalent to manslaughter at the least and possibly homicide.
They ruled that this death was caused by "following vehicles" the operators of which have never been identified, consisting of four, I believe, motorcycles and one white Fiat Uno.
The popular press, or mainstream media has reported the conclusion of the inquest as "death by motor vehicle accident" caused by pursuing paparazzi, but according to the video, the police investigation accounted for all the paparazzi present that night and showed that none of them were near Princess Diana's vehicle at the time of the accident.
The video is a devastating indictment of the British establishment.
I love documentaries. One of my favorite documentary websites is "Conscious Video Directory".edit on 2-1-2013 by ipsedixit because: (no reason given)
So you make a thread telling us SIS killed
Originally posted by CJCrawley
The Royal coroner removed all of her reproductive organs soon after her demise.
Well, as he did not get the body for some time, and the claim is that they were removed in france
Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Care to show us some valid proof for your claim?
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Care to show us some valid proof for your claim?
You are very very confused (about a lot of things apparently)
YOU made the claim "What is strange is the removal of her uterus after she was embalmed in France. "
I simply asked you to back that silly claim up, but you refuse to as you know it is not true.
You then ask me for proof of a statement you made....
Do you even remember what you wrote in this thread?
Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Now will you prove you assertion or shall we assume you are confused?
I am never confused,
Well, as he did not get the body for some time, and the claim is that they were removed in france
Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Originally posted by NEB0168
reply to post by ~widowmaker~
Completely agree - there was a lot of speculation that Di was indeed pregnant, and if i remember correctly, there were even eyewitness accounts of her being very much alive at the scene, but Im not sure about the credibiity of either claim.
Excited to make my first post on a thread! ( newbie here)
What is strange is the removal of her uterus after she was embalmed in France.
Why not her lungs or brains too? It was just her uterus.