How will we ever know..
regardless imo this is a sign of desperation within Syria..
Neither side in this conflict is right,there are just levels of less wrong..
edit on 29-11-2012 by all2human because: (no reason
given)
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
reply to post by beezzer
We had freedom of expression before Gutenberg too...but compromising the newspapers has always been considered a first amendment violation. Basically if there is a means of communication, the government can't prohibit it's use.
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
reply to post by beezzer
Well, yeah. In Syria it is just the cherry on top of a sundae of true crimes on humanity during the course of a dictator waging war on his country...but if the US figured out a way to kill the internet here, and did it tomorrow, it would easily qualify as a 1st amendment violation.
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
reply to post by beezzer
Are you being dense on purpose? What part of online freedom of expression did you not understand?
Wow,drinking the punch have much?And Obama isn't guilty of crimes against his own constitution and humanity?Bush?Netanyahoo?i could go on and on... Point your finger at one, point it to all... Ones person's mass muderer/terrorist is another's war hero/freedom fighter

EXPECT
The internet's great, but I swear it will be our downfall. Too much reliance, too much centralized control, too hard to regulate.
We need a serious citizens protection force, with superior skills to government agencies, and fast.