It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by GideonFaith
I think you have the wrong person about taxes. Maybe sweetliberty??
No matter. I only responded to the post. Guess you jumped in there somewhere.
My body - - MY Free Will and Responsibility - - - NOT anyone else.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by GideonFaith
There's a lot a things that taxpayer money goes to that many object to. Unfortunately, we often don't have a say in how tax dollars are spent.
If you think that certain types of birth control should not be sponsored by insurance, because they cause spontaneous abortion, or that a woman shouldn't use medical insurance for a medical procedure to terminate a pregnancy, you are in the minority.edit on 10-11-2012 by windword because: OCD Spelling
Because abortions are still murders, not matter when they are performed. If you think I am in the minority, then you haven't researched enough.
Some forms of contraception, specifically the intrauterine device (IUD), Norplant, and certain low-dose oral contraceptives, often do not prevent conception but prevent implantation of an already fertilized ovum. The result is an early abortion, the killing of an already conceived individual. Tragically, many women are not told this by their physicians, and therefore do not make an informed choice about which contraceptive to use.”
www.epm.org...
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by GideonFaith
Because abortions are still murders, not matter when they are performed. If you think I am in the minority, then you haven't researched enough.
See, this is problem with the pro-life argument. If you believe that life begins at conception, and that all life is sacred, then many forms of birth control would violate those morals.
Some forms of contraception, specifically the intrauterine device (IUD), Norplant, and certain low-dose oral contraceptives, often do not prevent conception but prevent implantation of an already fertilized ovum. The result is an early abortion, the killing of an already conceived individual. Tragically, many women are not told this by their physicians, and therefore do not make an informed choice about which contraceptive to use.”
www.epm.org...
It would be disingenuous for a pro-life individual to support any form of birth control that results in abortion. Therefore, the birth control methods that the majority of women use today would come under scrutiny and would be banned by pro-life legislation.
This is the root of the opposition's argument against the GOP's platform on the "Personage Amendment." It places the primal urges associated with human biology and reproduction above the free will of the individual woman, placing the rights of the unborn above her own sovereignty. This is where the pro-life community is in the minority.
Originally posted by windword
See, this is problem with the pro-life argument. If you believe that life begins at conception, and that all life is sacred, then many forms of birth control would violate those morals.
It would be disingenuous for a pro-life individual to support any form of birth control that results in abortion. Therefore, the birth control methods that the majority of women use today would come under scrutiny and would be banned by pro-life legislation.
This is the root of the opposition's argument against the GOP's platform on the "Personage Amendment." It places the primal urges associated with human biology and reproduction above the free will of the individual woman, placing the rights of the unborn above her own sovereignty. This is where the pro-life community is in the minority.
Thanks for your arguments. However, I beg to differ. You are linking 2 issues into 1 - birth control insurance and women's rights into as you termed it yourself by your own opinion 'Personage Amendment'.
Birth control insurance is a flexible commodity arrangement between insurers and clients. It can be strucked out if the need is there, or be added in if it can help the poor whom may not have the means to pay for it, in order to save a life, paid by subscibers of that insurance.
Life - is far more important and precious than rigid dogmas in order that mankind progresses and evolve.
Furthermore, insurance do not indulge in frivolity, but only the necessary. For those who seek for condoms, they do not cost much, but if paid by insurance, will be because of a human weakness, a weakness we flawed mortal humans only have perhaps in other forms.
A woman's right is involiate, for she too, is a child of our common Creator, given free will which no mortal can take away, and is her choice, right and responsibility over the critical issue of abortions - a case of life and death, over and above other non critical issues which society can determine, but not over abortion.
So, please do not lump everything as one, for the sake of clarity so that all may freely make informed choices.
Originally posted by windword
Contraception IS a necessity. Condoms are not always trustworthy.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Annee
I know.
I think that many men measure their worth according to their virility.
Good thing most women don't measure their worth according to their fertility, or we would have an even bigger population problem than we do now.
Originally posted by windword
Many forms of contraception cause abortions. People who are morally opposed to having to chip in to a fund that also provides for abortions are hypocritical if they endorse these certain types of birth control.
If you hate the religious faithfuls,
but if day you happened to see one of them, obviously of religion by their religous accoutermens worn, lying on the ground in need of help, would you help her or just walk on by?
Unless you are a misanthrope, you will most certainly help her. But are you being hypocritical?
Similarly, people who are morally opposed to having chip into insurance pool that covers abortion except for certain types of birth control, would they be hypocritical as you loudly proclaimed, if they do so only out of human charity for the misinformed, the poor, and the needy?
Equally, if people who are morally opposed to having chip into insurance pool that covers including abortions, and whom will fight tooth and nail against paying for such insurance, had they exhibited the famed christian charity towards the misinformed, the poor, and the needy, to save lives?
Abortion issue is far more complex than atheists can presume, which to them is cut and dried, and it is best left to those of religious faiths to search their heart over the issue, discuss and share.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Abortion issue is far more complex to mainstream religious faithfuls than atheists can presume, which to atheists or gnostics, is cut and dried, and it is best left to those of religious faiths to search their heart amongst their own over the issue, discuss share and find the right path out.
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Bone75
Not switching the subject, I'm expanding on the "primal" theme.
Fine... I'll bite.
But first I'd like you to clear up whether or not you acknowledge a primal instinct against abortion.
I've already said that the first primal act in the bible was murder.
Further, I have established that if rape is a primal act, which it is, then abortion is also primal.
Abortion is the cure to the victimization of primal forces.
You need to understand that birth control itself is a form of abortion. The pill and the IUD, as well as some other forms of birth control cause spontaneous abortion and make the uterus a hostile environment.
Birth control is a causative intention to prevent new life. It is an attempt to overthrow the laws of biology. And again I'll state it, "Biology is NOT God."
Further, I have established that if rape is a primal act, which it is, then abortion is also primal.
You haven't established anything.
Abortion is the cure to the victimization of primal forces.
Not true. Abortion is a product of evil just like rape.
Two wrongs don't make a right.