Youtube user ties the Anti-Muslim video to...? Wow!!!

page: 10
130
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 03:54 AM
link   
I bet you any money he works for the Army Psy Op! He's the disinformation specialist!




posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 04:45 AM
link   
What happens

One person once said - they wouldn't be that sensitive if the religion had any stability... because of the uncertainty of it and based on blind belief and fanatism, they fall for what one movie shows.

Aren't you pathetic you religious twats? The same is with every religion though, except I do not think Christians have been offended for example the caricatures and memes with Jesus.

So much FAIL in religion, tell me ONE REASON RELIGION MUST NOT BE ERRADICATED WORLDWIDE



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 05:02 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 05:04 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 05:10 AM
link   
2 religions that are good

Discordianism
and
Buddhism

perhaps taoism aswell.. confusicious-ism ?


Besides who cares about religion

Fact of the matter is The producers of Innocence of the Muslims are intimately close to the President of the United States..

Stanley incorporated.

So close that I would GUESS it was filmed inside the white house and non-natural-born president even suggested more blood and some lines of dialogue.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 05:36 AM
link   


"Montagraph" has released a "new" video debunking the debunkers that thought the google image search inquiry was fixed.


i kept waiting for someone here to reply to this...Seemed like everyone just kept ignoring it?? ALSO..I didn't catch any response to the question of, what was the relevance of the op vid guy getting all worked up over the posters age changing, or diapering?

Very interesting thread, THANKS for keeping me up all night


edit on 22-9-2012 by MidnightSunshine because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 05:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Docota
Hello,
I have been an ATS lurker for quite some time now.
I am making my very first post only to mention that the youtube user "Montagraph" has released a "new" video debunking the debunkers that thought the google image search inquiry was fixed. Ironically, I also thought the search was fixed but now I'm perplexed..

www.youtube.com...


Hi Doc
I'm perplexed as well - this doesn't add up. (but its late at night here)

I spent my morning uploading the logo/avatar to google and tineye and got zip.

I'm not sure why this guy's image search is coming up with something totally different to mine.
His comes up instantly with a "Stanley Inc" in the google search bar - but mine doesn't. (But I'm in Australia)

Tineye had nothing.


I dunno - I was ready to hoax this ...

After seeing that vid -



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 07:18 AM
link   
reply to post by MsAphrodite
 


Excellent! S&F


Montagraph has been a sobering favorite of mine for a few yrs now, he's a blast.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 09:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Docota
Hello,
I have been an ATS lurker for quite some time now.
I am making my very first post only to mention that the youtube user "Montagraph" has released a "new" video debunking the debunkers that thought the google image search inquiry was fixed. Ironically, I also thought the search was fixed but now I'm perplexed..

www.youtube.com...



Embedded that video.



Thank you! Just watched him do it live on Google.
With an uploaded image NPN, it immediately pulls up Stanley Inc.


This is important, and worth mentioning in relation.
Google does have secret knowledge that it does
use in its algorithm in searches.


Google algorithm are proprietary, yet they do reveal what they know to
a large degree in search results


As an example, when one searches for Obama's book "Dreams From My Father"
Google book list shows results that Bill Ayers actually did write "Dreams From My Father"
based on the language, and writers style, and it finds this in its algorithm searches.

www.americanthinker.com...

So....Google knows something that we cant see....and it returns search results
based on what Google knows, not what we can see.


This is highly significant ...IMO.

Remember, who went to work for Google directly from DARPA.
theintelhub.com...



This is one way that Intelligence (NSA, CIA) has a head start on how to manipulate the masses
with Social Media such as this "Innocence of Muslims" to begin with.

They already have inside info from Google, whats trending, what people are emotional
about....they probably know more about you than you know about yourself.
edit on 22-9-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)
edit on 22-9-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 09:46 AM
link   
reply to post by MsAphrodite
 

Thanks for that info. Here is more you will want to read

The Obama You Don't Know, And MUST
This is a great article that takes apart Barack Obama's carefully constructed phoney biography. He is not anything that he and Michelle say they are. They were not poor. What kind of a "professor" was he? Who is backing him, behind him? (Hint: a group of Chicago Arabs). Read this before November and send it to your Democrat/Liberal friends. [link to thedcpost.com]



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 09:47 AM
link   
Obama's cozy relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood
Not surprising that our Muslim born and educated president is in bed with these terrorists.

A conservative group has created an ad that they will be running immediately in several “swing states” that points out Barack Obama’s friendly relationship and support for an organization that has been labeled a terrorist one by many. About time. Here's a link to an editorial on this at www.thedcpost.com



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 09:50 AM
link   
I love how the title of the video is "Proof Positive! In my opinion".


People have completely lost their minds! You all think opinion is the same as proof! :shk: Jesus!



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 10:07 AM
link   
Now I am not claiming I am an expert by any means but the US IS a propaganda machine. It is ALL illusions no matter who you vote for. In reality you aren't voting for anyone you pick someone to vote for you. You know back in the day Mr. Rockefeller used the sheriff's and government officials to murder, steal, and to enforce his own law if you chose to go against him or even strikes.

"The Ludlow Massacre was an attack by the Colorado National Guard and Colorado Fuel & Iron Company camp guards on a tent colony of 1,200 striking coal miners and their families at Ludlow, Colorado on April 20, 1914."

Killed between 12-19 people, including 2 women and eleven children. Why hasn't this gained recognition? Because he hired Ivy Lee (public relations manager) to change Rockefeller's image. Rockefeller donated money to schools, hospitals, governments, charities and etc. to clean up his image.

Mr. Lee changed history in itself. He ran stories claiming the deaths happened by fire and not by a firing squad. He blamed the camp leader which has the union leader at the time, claiming she left the furnace on and it exploded.

Where am I going with this?

Public Relations IS THE UNITED STATES. YOU HAVE NO VOTE. INDUSTRIALISTS/BANKERS HAVE THE ONLY SAY.

I strongly believe this video was made to take away freedom of speech from the American people. So now not only will it be a crime to make videos about your opinions, but you also have no vote, say, or sway. This video will lead the government to amend the constitution to stop you from expression free speech, and will eventually confiscate your weapons and enslave the population to 1900's era.

BTW, we don't have a true democracy. We have a huge political acting stage, And just like a stage, there are actors (politicians) and there are people who fund the plays (corporations) and you have your writers/producers (behind the scenes people who run and expect the actors to run their scripts.)

All you need is one more freedom of speech abuse and you can kiss it goodby.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 11:36 AM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


Lol. People so desperate to believe hoaxes. Do the search yourself, you will get nothing. Ask yourself why ONLY this guy gets stanley inc results when searching this image?

Darthfazer already told us why on page 8
"Because he used his Google Chrome browsers inspect elements feature and manipulated it. This is what Monty does he has done this before and has been caught and exposed in videos by my peers. However he had the videos removed under hate speech or false DMCA claims lol. He is notorious for circumventing the system flagging videos that expose his fraudulent claims. He claimed James Holmes was a Darpa psy op for instance. He fabricates these stories to get views. I could do a video showing how he did it but i cant use youtube because he will surely flag it. I have never used the media portal here for videos perhaps i will put something together later this evening. My peers are better at it since they debunked him several times before. Maybe i can get them to post here."

He originally linked the image search with "stanley inc" written in the description text field along with his image search to try to fool idiots, then when caught for that he manipulates his browser to get the results again on video. Knowledgeable people can manipulate their browsers to produce any result they want, showing a video of doing the search proves jack #, especially from a guy known for doing this. Search around and you can find all sorts of # you can do manipulate browsers (ex: google chrome elements )

Just do the search yourself and you'll get nothing! What other proof do you need? There is no reason he should get different results than everyone else other than he is manipulating to get the result he wants.
THIS is the real image search result when you don't type "stanley inc" in the text field (which is obviously going to give you a stanley inc result....)
GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH

As you can see, nothing about stanley inc. Now if you type "stanley inc" in the description field like his original link had, of course you'll get those same stanley inc results, go figure, searching stanley inc gives stanley inc results.
This guy is a known hoaxer who just wants views. This thread should be in the hoax bin.
edit on 22-9-2012 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:34 PM
link   
NPN trade mark belongs to a bread company. Wenner Bread Products, Inc.

trade.mar.cx...

trade.mar.cx...

img02.mar.cx...

And it is the same NPN logo at the bottom f this page posted by Montagraph.

webcache.googleusercontent.com...:xRVFOiiD1MoJ:www.indiegogo.com/chrisstevens+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

"http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xRVFOiiD1MoJ:www.indiegogo.com/chrisstevens+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us"
Third link down.


Published on Sep 20, 2012 by Montagraph UPDATE: "Innocence of Muslims" Filmaker, Federal Informant - Huffingtonpost link www.huffingtonpost.com... UPDATE: Glen Beck reported that the Embassy staff were communicating via a gaming forum! Go to "DarthF3TT" channel on YT and will notice that out of 11 videos, NINE of them are [Gaming Videos] ONE is the Innocence of Muslims and TWO are about the Embassy Killings. Screen Cap It - I Did! Here is the link!!! www.youtube.com... UPDATE: Look who created this now deleted page. This url was captured via a Google Cache trying to sell the Christopher Stevens was killed because of the Innocence of Muslim "Film", look who posted it! "NPN" NewsPoliticsNow3 webcache.googleusercontent.com...:xRVFOiiD1MoJ:www.indiego...


Was this link used in a donation scam the reason all links were taken down from the page? Seems a News outlet would be in trade mark violation if they were using it. And when you do a search for NPN logos none of them are in the same plan text style as Wenner Bread Products, Inc.

Just put NPN logos into www.google.com... and search for your self.
edit on 22-9-2012 by JBA2848 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   
I downloaded the image myself, used google and uploaded the image and all I got was....big surprise....nothing but links back to the "newspoliticsnow" youtube account and some random "visually similar images."

So his video "debunking the debunkers" is a fail.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by JBA2848
 


The NPN Wenner bread logo can also be seen here:

logo database



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 01:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
I downloaded the image myself, used google and uploaded the image and all I got was....big surprise....nothing but links back to the "newspoliticsnow" youtube account and some random "visually similar images."

So his video "debunking the debunkers" is a fail.


So you have never heard of Google scrubbing sensitive images as soon as a huge story about these images breaks on the Internet?



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by micpsi

Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
I downloaded the image myself, used google and uploaded the image and all I got was....big surprise....nothing but links back to the "newspoliticsnow" youtube account and some random "visually similar images."

So his video "debunking the debunkers" is a fail.


So you have never heard of Google scrubbing sensitive images as soon as a huge story about these images breaks on the Internet?


No. That's not what happened. Please stop trying to make excuses for a hoaxer. Besides the fact that I have to roll my eyes at the claim that Google is on some conspiracy to stop a youtube video with only 10,000 views from a known hoaxer, I did the search myself way before his fake "debunk" 2nd video where he supposedly reproduces the results without the "stanley inc" description, I got no stanley inc results because there are none. Meanwhile, if you type in "stanley inc" as the description like he did in the original link, you still get the same stanley inc results (DUH).

He tried to trick people by putting "stanley inc" in the description box along with his image search to obviously get stanley inc results, got caught, then posted another video where he manipulated his browser as he is known for doing. Read my previous post for more details, explaining exactly what happened. He's a scumbag hoaxer, period.
edit on 22-9-2012 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 01:10 PM
link   
reply to post by micpsi
 

And you've never heard of people sensationalizing things to the point where they make stuff up just to gain popularity on YouTube? LOL is right.





new topics
 
130
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join