reply to post by wardk28
He can put up 1,000 videos showing 1,000 different ways he supposedly achieves that result. Until someone other than him can get the same results or
even remotely similar results, (even one tiny reference somewhere!) he's proven nothing. Oh, and there is a plugin for Firefox called Firebug that
allows manipulation using inspect elements. I've never used it and I have no idea if he is or not but it's a possibility.
Why can't anyone get the same results?
And I may be wrong on this next point but doesn't Google Image search work by finding images that are actually on the site? Why do I not see this
logo on any of the links for Stanley, Inc? Surely, if Google is finding that image to be related to them, then you'd be able to find it somewhere on
Stanley, Inc. web pages, right?
And how does this NPN logo relating to Stanley, Inc (assuming it does) even have anything to do with anything? It's a plain-text three-letter
sequence, nothing special about it, no fancy font or anything even slightly distinguishing about it. Another poster in this thread and myself
actually found the exact same logo belonging to Wenner Bread. So it would make much more sense to me to connect Wenner Bread as being the ones behind
this nefarious plot to bring the world to WW3.
Does the whole thing smell bad? Yes. I believe it was a psyops fake-out. But this whole logo connection thing is just stupid. Without that, what
does this guy actually have?
Edit: I just noticed in this "apology" video thing he made, when he puts the image in there and clicks search, the term "stanley, inc." comes up in
his search box next to the image. How does that happen? It doesn't happen when I do it. When I put the image into google image search and then
click search, ONLY the image I put in the search area is there and no text appears in the search box. This YET AGAIN shows that the search results
he's getting are clearly from the image AND the term "stanley, inc" together. When he hits search after inserting the image, watch the search
box--you'll see the term in there every time he does it. This very clearly shows the results he's getting are not just from the image itself.
Here's a screenshot from his first search at 6:41 I took from his video so you can see what I'm talking about:
And it happens every time he shows us how right he is. LOL Fail, yet again.
edit on 24-9-2012 by CoherentlyConfused because: (no reason given)
edit on 24-9-2012 by CoherentlyConfused because: (no