It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by caladonea
Here is a link to the letter sent by President Obama requesting a copy of his birth certificate; and the dept. of records response letter.
hawaii.gov...
DENY IGNORANCE!
edit on 19-7-2012 by caladonea because: add more
Sheriff’s investigators in Hawaii were stymied by the state registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health, Alvin Onaka, as well as the Attorney General’s Office in Honolulu when investigators asked to compare the White House version of the LFBC to the original document presumably held in Hawaii. Investigators met with the Hawaii Assistant Attorney General, Jill Nagamine. Nagamine refused to give Sheriff’s investigators permission to see the original birth documentation held by the Hawaii Department of Health which was used to create the President’s long form birth certificate. Furthermore, Nagamine refused to verify whether the PDF birth certificate released by the White House is in fact an exact copy of the document released to the President’s attorneys.
Investigators learned that Hawaii Department of Health utilizes a coding system defined by the federal government to categorize and code the required information on all Birth Certificates registered by the state including those registered in 1961. This process involves writing specific number codes by hand and in pencil, placed next to relevant information contained on the birth certificate. The coding numbers seen on the President’s LFBC are not consistent with the coding responses required by the federal government to match the information presented. The incorrect codes indicate that the President’s LFBC has been altered or amended.
Investigators tracked down the person who was the local registrar at the time of Obama’s birth who allegedly signed and coded the document which Obama now says proves his birth place as Hawaii. Verna K. Lee, now a 95 year-old woman, allegedly signed the document on August 8, 1961. She provided information about the vital information codes and their corresponding meanings. The information she provided challenges the President’s claim that his birthplace in 1961 was the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Arpaio has posted a pdf of the results of their investigation here:
www.mcso.org...
Sheriff’s investigators in Hawaii were stymied by the state registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health, Alvin Onaka, as well as the Attorney General’s Office in Honolulu when investigators asked to compare the White House version of the LFBC to the original document presumably held in Hawaii. Investigators met with the Hawaii Assistant Attorney General, Jill Nagamine. Nagamine refused to give Sheriff’s investigators permission to see the original birth documentation held by the Hawaii Department of Health which was used to create the President’s long form birth certificate. Furthermore, Nagamine refused to verify whether the PDF birth certificate released by the White House is in fact an exact copy of the document released to the President’s attorneys.
So why'd Nagamine refuse it? Cause there's nothing to hide?
Investigators learned that Hawaii Department of Health utilizes a coding system defined by the federal government to categorize and code the required information on all Birth Certificates registered by the state including those registered in 1961. This process involves writing specific number codes by hand and in pencil, placed next to relevant information contained on the birth certificate. The coding numbers seen on the President’s LFBC are not consistent with the coding responses required by the federal government to match the information presented. The incorrect codes indicate that the President’s LFBC has been altered or amended.
It also indicates that whoever forged the damn thing only halfway knew what they were doing.
Investigators tracked down the person who was the local registrar at the time of Obama’s birth who allegedly signed and coded the document which Obama now says proves his birth place as Hawaii. Verna K. Lee, now a 95 year-old woman, allegedly signed the document on August 8, 1961. She provided information about the vital information codes and their corresponding meanings. The information she provided challenges the President’s claim that his birthplace in 1961 was the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.
Zullo described her in the video as "sharp as a tack", or something to that effect- not a 95 year old affected with terrible mental problems.edit on Thu Jul 19th 2012 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by flyswatter
The codes, as compared to what Arpaio thought they should be, were different. What he thought they should be was wrong.
Both of these things have been explained multiple times already in this thread.
reply to post by ptiderman
TextIsn't it the truth that matters here? If Obama is truly who he represents himself to be, then what is the problem? If a candidate wants to be a PUBLIC servant, they must sacrifice some of their privacy. If one wants to travel abroad, he must relinquish his proof of identification and citizenship. How can you imagine that to be the leader of the free world, the requirements are less restrictive? Where is your common sense? And where do you get your information?
Originally posted by skepticconwatcher
Originally posted by XeroOne
Funny, I don't remember anyone checking George Bush's birth certificate.
And they have the nerve to tell us to stop talking about Bain Capital and the hidden Tax Records.
Yeah. NOT
Originally posted by longlostbrother
I think you're really confused!
OR you're just lying?
Pro bono legal counsel may assist an individual or group on a legal case by filing government applications or petitions.A judge may occasionally determine that the loser should compensate a winning pro bono counsel.
Often times, attorneys working on a Pro bono basis may assist the injured party by filing government applications or petitions on their behalf where a presiding judge may ultimately determine that the losing litigant compensates the winning pro bono counsel.
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
Privacy ends when you become an elected public official