It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by old_god
My stepdad use to say the definition of an expert is ex = has been and spurt = drip
Please do not think that you know everything because if you think that you know everything already what is there to learn? There have been many times where experts have been wrong...
Not saying the OP is right but I hate your kind of attitude...
Really? You honestly believe you have the where with all to explain the Big Bang?
My points about the Big Bang theory is that it is just another nonsensical CREATIONIST THEORY invented by Scientists
Originally posted by denver22
Originally posted by golemina
I was talking about the hedonistic version of 'pagan' worship.
Well mrs right your wrong as we are not talking about pagan worship
The thread is about
"The sun is much smaller and a lot closer than we are lead to believe"
Put that in your pipe and smoke it since you keep going on about pipes.
Ok, you state the sun is much smaller and a lot closer.
Let's for the sake of discussion assume that you're correct in your belief ... then I'm sure you will be able to specify EXACTLY the size of the sun and it's EXACT distance from earth. Also name your sources.
If you're going to make up these sort of threads, then at least have the "cahunas" to back up your claims with hard data.
Edit: Just occurred to me that using your "logic", we could just as readily state that the sun is much BIGGER and much FURTHER away.
Originally posted by burning_need Heck a few thousand years ago a couple of pretty smart people not only figured out the size of the earth with a couple of sticks placed in the sand, but they also knew how far away the sun was. MATH IS AWESOME IN THE CORRECT HANDS.
Originally posted by tauristercus
Hey blocula,
All the way back on page 3 I asked you a very SIMPLE question ... which I will repeat now:
Ok, you state the sun is much smaller and a lot closer.
Let's for the sake of discussion assume that you're correct in your belief ... then I'm sure you will be able to specify EXACTLY the size of the sun and it's EXACT distance from earth. Also name your sources.
If you're going to make up these sort of threads, then at least have the "cahunas" to back up your claims with hard data.
Edit: Just occurred to me that using your "logic", we could just as readily state that the sun is much BIGGER and much FURTHER away.
So how about finally answering it now that I've had to ask it twice !
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
No matter how we look at them,we are never able to see anywhere near the many billions of stars that supposedly are out there all around us all the time and so stars must have their own selective light shining capabilities and the stars decide amongst themselves which ones light reaches us and which ones light doesnt...
"Ello Steve"...."Ello Dave"...."Hey how are the kids?"......"Yeah not bad Steve, how are yours?"...."Yeah good Dave, thanks for asking"....."Er so whose go is it tonight pal, I thought it was my turn last week to 'selectively shine my light across the universe into the eye socket of 'teh Blocks' "......"Oh right, must be my go then, well ere goes then...oops that was the curry from last night"
Originally posted by denver22
reply to post by mee30
Standing in a flat plateau, you look ahead of you towards the horizon. You strain your eyes, then take out your favorite binoculars and stare through them, as far as your eyes (with the help of the binocular lenses) can see.
Then, you climb up the closest tree – the higher the better, just be careful not to drop those binoculars and break their lenses. You then look again, strain your eyes, stare through the binoculars out to the horizon.
The higher up you are the farther you will see. Usually, we tend to relate this to Earthly obstacles, like the fact we have houses or other trees obstructing our vision on the ground, and climbing upwards we have a clear view, but that’s not the true reason. Even if you would have a completely clear plateau with no obstacles between you and the horizon, you would see much farther from greater height than you would on the ground.
This phenomena is caused by the curvature of the Earth as well, and would not happen if the Earth was flat:
Originally posted by Wandering Scribe
reply to post by golemina
Really? You honestly believe you have the where with all to explain the Big Bang?
Why shouldn't I? Science understands the process very well actually.
My points about the Big Bang theory is that it is just another nonsensical CREATIONIST THEORY invented by Scientists
I must disagree. The Big Bang is not creationism. It is cosmic evolution. I am disappointed to see that you do not understand anything about the Big Bang. You still believe it was a magical explosion, which made everything as it currently is. You're just as uneducated as Blocula.
I see now I was wasting my time, hoping you'd have something worthwhile to say.
Also, paganism is not Hedonism. And Electromagnetism is responsible for subatomic particle interaction and attraction. Gravity is responsible for physical object attraction. They are different things. I see I should have listened to other ATS posters earlier, when they pointed out your clear lack of actually knowing what you're talking about.
Just another wind bag emptying their insides into the aether, hoping to make a sound in the empty vacuum of space.
~ Wandering Scribe
You're just as uneducated as Blocula.
Just another wind bag emptying their insides into the aether, hoping to make a sound in the empty vacuum of space.
Originally posted by Donkey_Dean
Originally posted by tauristercus
Hey blocula,
All the way back on page 3 I asked you a very SIMPLE question ... which I will repeat now:
Ok, you state the sun is much smaller and a lot closer.
Let's for the sake of discussion assume that you're correct in your belief ... then I'm sure you will be able to specify EXACTLY the size of the sun and it's EXACT distance from earth. Also name your sources.
If you're going to make up these sort of threads, then at least have the "cahunas" to back up your claims with hard data.
Edit: Just occurred to me that using your "logic", we could just as readily state that the sun is much BIGGER and much FURTHER away.
So how about finally answering it now that I've had to ask it twice !
It is just as likely or even more likely that we live in a simulation vs. not living in one.
The simulation argument was set forth in a paper published in 2003. A draft of that paper had previously been circulated for a couple of years.
The argument shows that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.
The argument has attracted a considerable amount of attention, among scientists and philosophers as well as in the media.
References:
N. Bostrom, “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” Philosophical Quarterly, 2003, Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243-255. URL: www.simulation-argument.com...
N. Bostrom & M. Kulczycki, “A Patch for the Simulation Argument” Analysis, 2011, Vol. 71, No.1, pp. 54-61. URL: www.simulation-argument.com...
Personally I think the fact that we see things like the Dual Slit experiment shows may speak to the truth of the matter.