It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"...The life of this world is nothing but an illusion."
[al-Hadeed - 57:20], Qur'an.
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
OMG. Another delusional person with no bearing on the scientific concepts they choose to deal in. If you understood how gravity operates, or at least understood the current theory of how gravity operates (lol), you would know why what you just posted is laughable. Everything is moving throughout space, although everything seems stationary.
You say you cannot believe the sun is that big and that far away, but that just shows that YOU have a problem with perception, and has no bearing on the scientific aspects of the solar system and how bodies orbit one another. The sun is the biggest object in our solar system, and THAT is why everything revolves around it, and not the other way around.
The fact that light travels at 186,000 mi/s means that the sun's radiation takes a little over 8 minutes to reach the earth, which puts the sun at about 93 million miles away. I don't see what is so hard to believe, considering science is a body of knowledge that is built upon what came before it, and our understanding can be traced back in time to prove scientifically that what you are saying is incorrect.
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by InLightTend
With many billions of stars of all sizes and ages all around us all the time,only a few thousand of them have light thats able to reach us?
the night sky should be illuminated more or less like day,aglow with the light from billions of stars,but its not,it never is...
so either stars have the amazing abilty to decide amongst themselves which ones light will reach us and which ones light will not...
or its all a fantastic holographic illusion...
The Holographic Universe Michael Talbot > quanta-gaia.org...
edit on 1-7-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
intentionally designed holographic illusion thats being malevolently projected into our visible spectrum from another dimension
Originally posted by old_god
reply to post by blocula
intentionally designed holographic illusion thats being malevolently projected into our visible spectrum from another dimension
Dude, seriously? Read your own line, that "malevolently projected"...
Next you will be shouting "ALL YOUR BASES ARE BELONG TO US!" in some freaky Asian dictator voice.
1. Do your homework, use google, accept the science, I know it's hard for you to accept that some of us have spent a long time learning this "malevolently projected" stuff but that's why some of us are called "EXPERTS", say it after me:
"EX....PAAAA.....EEERRRR.......TTTTTTTTTTT"
There, see wasn't so hard right?
2. When you are about to post something that requires the rest of your audience to lower their IQ significantly, please reread your words, phrases, paragraphs etc and try to put yourself in the shoes of a "normal" person who is reading your posts, then you will realise that your gobbledygook only makes sense to you.
3. Don't ask a retarded question then make yourself sound smart by trying to ask a rhetorical question that is equally as retarded.
And by retarded I mean: "a normal person who chooses to be dumb out of their own choice"edit on 1-7-2012 by old_god because: (no reason given)edit on 1-7-2012 by old_god because: (no reason given)
I find it extremely difficult trying to believe,never mind trying to comprehend that a universe thats many billions of light years across,suddenly burst into existence from within a point of space around a millionth of an inch across?!
Originally posted by bjarneorn
Actually, the OP has a point ... about orbits, gravity and the sun.
And one more thing, and I love this part the most of all ... IFF there was a BIG BANG, then we are exactly the same size universe as the dot, that exploded. We can be, neither bigger or smaller.
It only leaves one alternative, and that is that distance is not what it seems ... on this part, I agree with the OP. But that is on the premises, that there was some sort of BIG BANG.edit on 1/7/2012 by bjarneorn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by paradox
I dont think the moon really cares how big or small,or how far away the sun actually is,but i sure do...
We are able to see with our eyes the light from a few hundred stars reaching us all the time and so why are we not able to see the light from the millions and billions of stars reaching us that supposedly are out there?
Surely the night sky should be lit up and aglow more or less like daytime,should it not?
edit on 1-7-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by SaturnFX
Also he is posting in the damn skunkworks for god sake! It's made for posts like this is it not? if you do not like it why did you even bother to come here and post? Shouldn't you be complaining to ATS to do away with the skunkworks forum? Not berating people for using it.
Originally posted by blocula
I find it extremely difficult trying to believe,never mind trying to comprehend that a universe thats many billions of light years across,suddenly burst into existence from within a point of space around a millionth of an inch across?!
Originally posted by bjarneorn
Actually, the OP has a point ... about orbits, gravity and the sun.
And one more thing, and I love this part the most of all ... IFF there was a BIG BANG, then we are exactly the same size universe as the dot, that exploded. We can be, neither bigger or smaller.
It only leaves one alternative, and that is that distance is not what it seems ... on this part, I agree with the OP. But that is on the premises, that there was some sort of BIG BANG.edit on 1/7/2012 by bjarneorn because: (no reason given)
Then why are we able to see any stars at all,shouldnt we be seeing all of them,or seeing none of them? theres billions of stars all around us that are about the same age as the few thousand we do see and all of those billions of stars are streaming outwards their light equally as much as the few thousand we do see and so we should definitely be seeing all of them and so why dont we,why cant we? is it because the super advanced aliens curtain of holographic stars only contains the few thousand that we can see,just enough to keep us believing in their projected illusion?
Originally posted by F4guy
The night sky is not filled with millions of stars. It is filled with billions of them. Human eyes just can't see all of them.
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by tamusan
Why do we only see a few hundred stars at night? why isnt the night sky filled with millions of stars? why isnt the sky at night aglow like day?
Originally posted by old_god
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by paradox
I dont think the moon really cares how big or small,or how far away the sun actually is,but i sure do...
We are able to see with our eyes the light from a few hundred stars reaching us all the time and so why are we not able to see the light from the millions and billions of stars reaching us that supposedly are out there?
Surely the night sky should be lit up and aglow more or less like daytime,should it not?
edit on 1-7-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
answers.yahoo.com... - short and simple, if that is not enough I can give you my basic knowledge of physics and explain why light travelling the vast distance of space is an "illusion" because it has aged and as such the star that you think you can see at night may not exist anymore.
If you can afford, by a decent camera and set up long exposure night shot, then you will see what you are expecting to see, a tapestry of the night sky.
This is what I love about ATS, give it enough time and someone somewhere will take enough pharmaceutical drugs to become entertaining on here.
Originally posted by golemina
Originally posted by old_god
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by paradox
I dont think the moon really cares how big or small,or how far away the sun actually is,but i sure do...
We are able to see with our eyes the light from a few hundred stars reaching us all the time and so why are we not able to see the light from the millions and billions of stars reaching us that supposedly are out there?
Surely the night sky should be lit up and aglow more or less like daytime,should it not?
edit on 1-7-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
answers.yahoo.com... - short and simple, if that is not enough I can give you my basic knowledge of physics and explain why light travelling the vast distance of space is an "illusion" because it has aged and as such the star that you think you can see at night may not exist anymore.
If you can afford, by a decent camera and set up long exposure night shot, then you will see what you are expecting to see, a tapestry of the night sky.
Answers.Yahoo.Com?
Say, didn't they win the Nobel Prize for physics?
This is what I love about ATS, give it enough time and someone somewhere will take enough pharmaceutical drugs to become entertaining on here.
Don't be so hard on yourself.