It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
hmmm, without going down the comparison road so many have laid before me, i still have a question or two.
anyone care to explain how or why this requirement isn't discriminatory to every citizen who does not possess them?
Originally posted by wardk28
If this was about protecting the First Lady, she wouldn't be doing a book signing. So let me get this straight, she is using tax payer dollars to push her book? How much is it costing to run back ground checks on each person? When will people stop treating these so called "public servents" like rock stars?
imho, there isn't any signature worthy of that hassle.
I think this has more to do with the fact that she is FLOTUS. I mean, come on, I know we'd all love to believe that this world is all gumdrops, rainbows and cheeseburger farting unicorns but it's not. We have to expect some form of screening is going to be required.
seabag, i don't know where you are going with this question but again, it doesn't add to the topic or answer the questions i posed nor is the topic about voter IDs.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Honor93
imho, there isn't any signature worthy of that hassle.
Something is always better than nothing (which many states have now).
What do you propose; national ID?
Originally posted by seabag
In an extreme display of hypocrisy, the first lady required people to provide photo ID and their SS number before she would consider autographing her book that they purchased.
link
On Friday, June 8th, those wishing to attend the event must purchase a copy of the First Lady's book at the location and leave it at the store, according to the employee. At the same time, customers must also submit their social security number and show an official photo ID (driver's license, passport) to a Secret Service agent, and they will be issued a wristband to the First Lady's event on June 12.( Emphasis added)
The liberal media, particularly Obama-boosting cable network MSNBC has done its best to attack voter ID laws as discriminatory at best and racist at worst.
I thought requiring people to provide ID and their SSN was a racist act like the Jim Crow laws of 1877? Isn’t that what we have been told? Obama himself has done his best to prevent stricter voting laws that would require people to show ID but apparently it’s ok to have that requirement to get an autograph from an elitist like Michelle Obama?
I’m sick of these hypocritical elitists?
I don’t begrudge the first lady the necessary level of security required to ensure her safety. I understand why the SS did what they did. My point is that Obama says it’s “racist” to check people's ID when it comes to voting but somehow its justified in this case.
Ms Obama (for some reason unknown to me) does appeal to many youthful girls in this country.
i would presume, there is an abundance of youth who would like to participate in this "signing".
how many 12-14 yr olds have or carry Photo ID and SS cards ???
(showing my age a bit here but my generation didn't even consider it til after age 16)
i suppose it's possible that many youth today have said credentials but i don't assume such.
So, in light of the above, what's with the discrimination associated with this public event that taypayers are being forced to finance ??
Originally posted by caladonea
reply to post by seabag
I think that the White House is just taking security measures to protect Mrs. Obama...nothing more...nothing less.
a few 14 yr old girls missing “Michelle” is the price to pay to somewhat clean up voter fraud
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by caladonea
reply to post by seabag
I think that the White House is just taking security measures to protect Mrs. Obama...nothing more...nothing less.
Yes, becasue the First Lady's life is way more important than the integrity of the voting process.