It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Starchild23
a·the·ism/ˈāTHēˌizəm/
Noun:
The theory or belief that God does not exist.
Originally posted by Starchild23
Two: the Bible is WAAYYYYY too open to interpretation, which is dangerous in any culture.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
I'll have to disagree with you on that.
Unless you were there and heard it, you cannot claim it to be truth. In fact, you cannot even claim to understand it. Parables is not code for "Literal".
John 10:30
King James Version (KJV)
30 I and my Father are one.
Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by Starchild23
Yes sorry, I know those are horrible things to say.
But it's a fact.
I'd like it to change.
Maybe the next generation can make it better.
At least I'd agree with the OP that "Christianity" is in moral trouble in much of the world.
People will say much for money, but money can't buy you love.
It's also become very superficial.
It's a good faith that was run by some very bad people.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Christianity in one word: Anti-homosexual
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Christianity in one word: Anti-homosexual
That's TWO words.
and it didn't start with nor is it limited to the Christian faith.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by Starchild23
Yes sorry, I know those are horrible things to say.
But it's a fact.
I'd like it to change.
Maybe the next generation can make it better.
At least I'd agree with the OP that "Christianity" is in moral trouble in much of the world.
People will say much for money, but money can't buy you love.
It's also become very superficial.
It's a good faith that was run by some very bad people.
We were warned that false christs and false prophets would come.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by SaturnFX
The entire thing would come crashing down, since Paul was supposed to carry on the Church.
Funny thing, really: from what I understand, Mary Magdelene was intended to be the voice of the Church, until she and Jesus both mysteriously disappeared after his crucifixion.
Then there's the matter of Sarah...
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by SaturnFX
St. Sarah, daughter of Jesus.
Supposedly raised in France after the scandal which ended in the "death" of Jesus. There's supposed to be a hidden tomb in the mountains of France, where all of her recorded life (and therefore all proof of royal lineage) is locked away.
Should someone find and access the tomb, the world will forever be changed. That is, assuming whoever finds it isn't assassinated and the discovery buried (excuse the pun) in order to avert mass chaos and calamity.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Christianity in one word: Anti-homosexual
That's TWO words.
and it didn't start with nor is it limited to the Christian faith.
Its one word. Anti is not a word in and of itself, in the same way un is not a word (undo, unintentional) Anti is a prefix
How Words Work
I mostly ignored the (incorrect) grammar nazi's earlier mostly due to not caring to educate them and instead focus on the thread verses their misunderstanding...but its late thread. enjoy.
As a word on its own anti is an adjective or preposition describing a person or thing that is against someone or something else. In a casual sense anti is sometimes used as a noun for a person who is against something — if you’re not on the pro side, you’re an anti.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
I disagree on anything that uses itself to explain itself and justify itself.
That's called circular logic, and it makes no more sense than an upside down pig drawn with invisible crayons.
The Catholic Church holds to the teaching that "by free will, (the human person) is capable of directing himself toward his true good … man is endowed with freedom, an outstanding manifestation of the divine image'."[49] Man has free will either to accept or reject the grace of God, so that for salvation "there is a kind of interplay, or synergy, between human freedom and divine grace".[50] "Justification establishes cooperation between God's grace and man's freedom. On man's part it is expressed by the assent of faith to the Word of God, which invites him to conversion, and in the cooperation of charity with the prompting of the Holy Spirit who precedes and preserves his assent: 'When God touches man's heart through the illumination of the Holy Spirit, man himself is not inactive while receiving that inspiration, since he could reject it; and yet, without God's grace, he cannot by his own free will move himself toward justice in God's sight' (Council of Trent)."[51]
In Rabbinic literature, there is much discussion as to the apparent contradiction between God's omniscience and free will. The representative view is that "Everything is foreseen; yet free will is given" (Rabbi Akiva, Pirkei Avoth 3:15). Based on this understanding, the problem is formally described as a paradox, beyond our understanding.
The Holy One, Blessed Be He, knows everything that will happen before it has happened. So does He know whether a particular person will be righteous or wicked, or not? If He does know, then it will be impossible for that person not to be righteous. If He knows that he will be righteous but that it is possible for him to be wicked, then He does not know everything that He has created. ...[T]he Holy One, Blessed Be He, does not have any temperaments and is outside such realms, unlike people, whose selves and temperaments are two separate things. God and His temperaments are one, and God's existence is beyond the comprehension of Man… [Thus] we do not have the capabilities to comprehend how the Holy One, Blessed Be He, knows all creations and events. [Nevertheless] know without doubt that people do what they want without the Holy One, Blessed Be He, forcing or decreeing upon them to do so... It has been said because of this that a man is judged according to all his actions. (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Teshuva 5:5 [79])
Is the traditional Christian belief in creatio ex nihilo, God's creation of the universe out of nothing, one that is inherent to biblical doctrine or one that is simply compatible with it? Is creatio ex nihilo nothing more than a defensive theological reaction to Gnosticism? Moreover, does the well-accepted Big Bang theory confirm the allegedly biblical doctrine of creation out of nothing? Is it solely up to science rather than Scripture to point us toward the nature of God's creation - whether it is finite or eternal?
Translated into the contemporary physicist's terms, the spatio-temporal world was created by God's word at the Big Bang, the beginning event and initial cosmic singularity (which has been dubbed t=0 or to). Astronomers John Barrow and Joseph Silk state that science points to "the traditional metaphysical picture of creation out of nothing, for it predicts a definite beginning to events in time, indeed a definite beginning to time itself."11 "Before" this initial singularity, space, time, matter, and motion did not exist. There was simply nothing (the simpler term for "infinite density").12 It must be added that when we speak of nothing, we must not imagine "nothing" as empty space or "an area of non-existence alongside of or over against the existence of God which would thereby be reduced to an existence with limitations."13 Nothingness
if you’re not on the pro side, you’re an anti.