It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Furbs
We keep going round and round on this. There -is- empirical evidence. That evidence is the -Evidence of God's Absence-. If God were here, much like the elephant walking through my garden, he would have left a trail. There isn't a trail. This lack of a trail is the evidence that God, like the elephant, isn't here.
Science is a tool. I do not put my FAITH in it, Science is a tool that helps us understand the universe. One does not need to put faith in something that can be verified using the scientific method.
The world either is or it is not. Science helps us separate what IS from what IS NOT. This is the difference between Science and Theology.
You are inferring that, I am not implying that. There is a difference, and let me be quite clear. I am -fortunate- to be educated and intelligent and never -blame- anyone for their lack of either. Jesus is the one dealing in absolutes. Jesus is the one the tells me I can't get to heaven unless I believe he is God. THAT is quite arrogant and rude, if you ask me.
I, personally, think that a God could or a God couldn't exist. What's the difference? We are here and we are alive, so why not focus on who we are and bettering who we are as a people rather than trying to prove how superior our beliefs are to the beliefs of other people?
Makes no sense to me.
Well, this thread isn't about getting along, it is about discussing the Bible. If the topic doesn't make sense to you.. I think you see where I'm going here so I will stop.
You are right in that "God" can be substituted for any universal emotion of humanity.
What I was illustrating, and what you also illustrated, is that actual proof is the tangible evidence of an intangible force.
That is proof of higher brain function, not God.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by Furbs
We keep going round and round on this. There -is- empirical evidence. That evidence is the -Evidence of God's Absence-. If God were here, much like the elephant walking through my garden, he would have left a trail. There isn't a trail. This lack of a trail is the evidence that God, like the elephant, isn't here.
I can answer all of your arguments by answering this one quote.
If an elephant walks through your garden and transforms itself into a new garden, wiping out all trace of it ever having been there, will you still walk out and decide there were no intruders?
Suppose God became the universe...what then? Would you still expect footprints? Especially if God gave every single piece it's own bit of intelligence, or it's own blueprint...
Source (as I call it) is the greatest architect in existence. Why? Because it made it's masterpiece out of its own flesh. It transformed into a vast space full of potential opportunities for life and knowledge.
reply to post by Furbs
I don't have to be everywhere to state that there is not evidence that a "God" character was ever -here-.
Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood
reply to post by Furbs
I don't have to be everywhere to state that there is not evidence that a "God" character was ever -here-.
What is 'evidence' in your eyes for the existence of GOD. If you don't know what criteria defines that evidence, how can you know where to look for it, let alone what you are looking for.
I don't have to be everywhere to state that there is not evidence that a "God" character was ever -here-.
Dont hate religion. You may hate the people who promote it and rightfully so some of them are complete bafoons and quite oblivious to what they are doing and saying. Man for 10;s of thousands of years maybe in the millions have alway believed in something greater than them.
Originally posted by sam_inc
Wow! Because I'm stupid, I'd have to read the bible to become more smarter, excellent!edit on 6-4-2012 by sam_inc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by netgamer7k
Thousands of beliefs? There are only 2 beliefs. Those who believe they can save themselves and those who believe they need a saviour. All of the religions of the world basically tell you there's something you need to do to save yourself. But the message of Christianity is unique in this, that it proclaims to men and women a saviour.
Originally posted by Starchild23
Originally posted by sam_inc
Wow! Because I'm stupid, I'd have to read the bible to become more smarter, excellent!edit on 6-4-2012 by sam_inc because: (no reason given)
Well, has mankind proven itself to be intelligent? It has not only been to the moon and created cures, it has attempted genocide and abandoned thousands to the mercy of tyrants. Even now, we continually poison our world.
How does that strike you for an intellectual, benevolent species?
Originally posted by bitsforbytes
reply to post by Starchild23
Like I said God said: THY SHALL NOT KILL. If a war is created because of religion then people are not using religion they are opposing it. Because, a religion cannot cause a war if it's main moral is not to kill. So, the people who practice religion are bad not religion.
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
who WROTE the "Bible"?
what version are we talking about here?- KING James? New World??
who decided whether the "Book of Daniel" (and others) was part of the Bible or not???
Originally posted by tomten
reply to post by Starchild23
The Book of Enoch was never included, in the Bible.
Like many other little books.
Originally posted by PurpleSun
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
who WROTE the "Bible"?
what version are we talking about here?- KING James? New World??
who decided whether the "Book of Daniel" (and others) was part of the Bible or not???
Constantine is the one responsible for the bible as we know it Contrary to belief, it was not decided upon at the First Council of Nicea however 50 were commissioned by Constantine in 331AD. Who wrote it? It depends on the individual book. It looks as if members of the council of Nicea helped Constantine to decide what books to be included in the bible, but there is no evidence of that or that it was decided at the first council of Nicea.