It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by holywar666
reply to post by choos
Yet you think we dont have the technology to create a zero gravity environment. By the link i posted, obviously they do. Would they blatantly tell us they have a secret room where astronauts can operate in? Are you crazy? That would be the single most used evidence posted by conspiracy theorists!edit on 15-4-2012 by holywar666 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by choos
also a bit of homework for you, since i need to step out for a bit.
work out how far it needs to fall to replicate 9mins 30 seconds worth of footage, thats 570 seconds falling on earth at 9.81 m/s^2
Howard went to great lengths to create a technically accurate movie, employing NASA's technical assistance in astronaut and flight controller training for his cast, and even obtaining permission to film scenes aboard a reduced gravity aircraft for realistic depiction of the "weightlessness" experienced by the astronauts in space.
Parks Observatory
When Buzz Aldrin switched on the TV camera on the Lunar Module, three tracking antennas received the signals simultaneously. They were the 64 metre Goldstone antenna in California, the 26 metre antenna at Honeysuckle Creek near Canberra in Australia, and the 64 metre dish at Parkes.
In the first few minutes of the broadcast, NASA alternated between the signals being received from its two stations at Goldstone and Honeysuckle Creek, searching for the best quality picture.
A little under nine minutes into the broadcast, the TV was switched to the Parkes signal. The quality of the TV pictures from Parkes was so superior that NASA stayed with Parkes as the source of the TV for the remainder of the 2.5 hour broadcast. For a comprehensive explanation of the TV reception of the Apollo 11 broadcast, see "The Television Broadcasts" from the report "On Eagles Wings".
On Monday, 31 October 2011, Google replaced its logo with a Google Doodle in honor of Parkes Observatory's 50th Anniversary.[4] It was only visible on Google in Australia.
Originally posted by holywar666
Originally posted by choos
also a bit of homework for you, since i need to step out for a bit.
work out how far it needs to fall to replicate 9mins 30 seconds worth of footage, thats 570 seconds falling on earth at 9.81 m/s^2
Your job is to disprove me. Do your own homework.
What about the Apollo 13 movie?
Howard went to great lengths to create a technically accurate movie, employing NASA's technical assistance in astronaut and flight controller training for his cast, and even obtaining permission to film scenes aboard a reduced gravity aircraft for realistic depiction of the "weightlessness" experienced by the astronauts in space.
Apollo 13
???? So they CAN film in zero-gravity locations on Earth! Very interesting....
Unified S Band
The voice and telemetry data to be transmitted from the spacecraft are modulated onto subcarriers, combined with the video ranging signals, and used to phase-modulate the down-link carrier frequency. The transponder transmitter can also be frequency- modulated for the transmission of television information or recorded data instead of ranging signals
It is historically understood that the USSR did intercept the Apollo missions telemetry on the territory of the USSR, but no source in the former USSR military or intelligence services has come forth with any evidence of this happening. The USSR used different frequency bands for its own space missions, so by default its deep space network did not readily have equipment able to receive Apollo telemetry. Whether China or any other non-Western (or non-aligned) country at the time chose to intercept any of the Apollo telemetry is unclear. Amateur radio and affiliated telecommunications sector persons could listen to the Apollo telemetry the world over—provided they could afford the reception equipment.
That low gravity simulator,operational since 1966,is the one we know about,because its the one we were allowed to know about.With multiple billions of dollars to work with, nasa and the american military surely could have developed and employed a top secret zero gravity simulation chamber that we'll probably never know about,because they'll never tell us and surely they have developed secret technologies through the years on a regular basis,that are at least 20 years ahead of what tptb tell the mainstream public about...
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by holywar666
Originally posted by choos
here on earth, we have something called gravity.
Here on Earth, we have NASA
Zero Gravity
Dont think an anti-gravity chamber cant happen....edit on 15-4-2012 by holywar666 because: (no reason given)
do you know how that works? thanks for proving my point.. free fall distance of 132m
traditionally they used the kc-135 to replicate lowered gravity, but the problem persists.. how do they get 9mins 32seconds of freefall footage?
Originally posted by blocula
That low gravity simulator,operational since 1966,is the one we know about,because its the one we were allowed to know about.With multiple billions of dollars to work with, nasa and the american military surely could have developed and employed a top secret zero gravity simulation chamber that we'll probably never know about,because they'll never tell us and surely they have developed secret technologies through the years on a regular basis,that are at least 20 years ahead of what tell the mainstream public about...
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by holywar666
Originally posted by choos
here on earth, we have something called gravity.
Here on Earth, we have NASA
Zero Gravity
Dont think an anti-gravity chamber cant happen....edit on 15-4-2012 by holywar666 because: (no reason given)
do you know how that works? thanks for proving my point.. free fall distance of 132m
traditionally they used the kc-135 to replicate lowered gravity, but the problem persists.. how do they get 9mins 32seconds of freefall footage?edit on 16-4-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Which is almost exactly the amount that the irs extorts from us and accumulates for the government in gross revenue every year,after refunds are paid out.In 2007,the irs made $2,674,007,818,000 and that is utterly sickening > en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by holywar666
Originally posted by choos
also a bit of homework for you, since i need to step out for a bit.
work out how far it needs to fall to replicate 9mins 30 seconds worth of footage, thats 570 seconds falling on earth at 9.81 m/s^2
Your job is to disprove me. Do your own homework.
What about the Apollo 13 movie?
Howard went to great lengths to create a technically accurate movie, employing NASA's technical assistance in astronaut and flight controller training for his cast, and even obtaining permission to film scenes aboard a reduced gravity aircraft for realistic depiction of the "weightlessness" experienced by the astronauts in space.
Apollo 13
???? So they CAN film in zero-gravity locations on Earth! Very interesting....
lets extrapolate the costs, 1.5 billion x 1920 (since this single shaft is 1920 times taller than the burj khalifa)
that is a paltry $2,880,000,000,000.
only a mere 2.9trillion dollars. should we put this to the NASA moon hoax film budget?edit on 16-4-2012 by choos because: (no reason given)edit on 16-4-2012 by choos because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
Which is almost exactly the amount that the irs extorts from us and accumulates for the government in gross revenue every year,after refunds are paid out.In 2007,the irs made around 2,600,000,000 dollars...en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by holywar666
Originally posted by choos
also a bit of homework for you, since i need to step out for a bit.
work out how far it needs to fall to replicate 9mins 30 seconds worth of footage, thats 570 seconds falling on earth at 9.81 m/s^2
Your job is to disprove me. Do your own homework.
What about the Apollo 13 movie?
Howard went to great lengths to create a technically accurate movie, employing NASA's technical assistance in astronaut and flight controller training for his cast, and even obtaining permission to film scenes aboard a reduced gravity aircraft for realistic depiction of the "weightlessness" experienced by the astronauts in space.
Apollo 13
???? So they CAN film in zero-gravity locations on Earth! Very interesting....
lets extrapolate the costs, 1.5 billion x 1920 (since this single shaft is 1920 times taller than the burj khalifa)
that is a paltry $2,880,000,000,000.
only a mere 2.9trillion dollars. should we put this to the NASA moon hoax film budget?edit on 16-4-2012 by choos because: (no reason given)edit on 16-4-2012 by choos because: (no reason given)edit on 16-4-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
With multiple billions of dollars to work with, nasa and the american military surely could have developed and employed a top secret zero gravity simulation chamber that we'll probably never know about,
Originally posted by holywar666
reply to post by defcon5
Besides seeing the rocket go up and come down, what proof do you have this "inside the space ship" footage is live?
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by choos
Theres 3 zeros missing from my post that you quoted from,but i fixed the numbers above.The whole point is that they have unlimited budgets to do anything they want,whenever they want,wherever they want and they dont have to tell us a thing,except give us more money,or else...