It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Have you taken the time to closely examine the moon hoax photographic evidence that i linked to a few posts earlier? its very compelling proof,imo,here it is again,for those who may have missed it...
Originally posted by denver22
reply to post by Gibborium
gib mate has blocular allways held these notions? im new to this site only been on here a few weeks i think we will never get some evidence will we from him?
I dont think any humans walked on the moon and as far as what do i think is on the moon,i'm not sure what you mean? nasa has probably fired un-manned rockets that crashed onto the moon and they may have even sent un-manned rockets there that then parachuted robotic objects down onto the moons surface,but no humans flew to the moon,walked upon its surface or flew back in 1969-72...
Originally posted by denver22
reply to post by blocula
[bloc ill ask you a question ...wot do you personally think is on the moon ? ]
Originally posted by blocula
I dont think any humans walked on the moon and as far as what do i think is on the moon,i'm not sure what you mean? nasa has probably fired un-manned rockets that crashed onto the moon and they may have even sent un-manned rockets there that then parachuted robotic objects down onto the moons surface,but no humans flew to the moon,walked upon its surface or flew back in 1969-72...
Originally posted by denver22
reply to post by blocula
[bloc ill ask you a question ...wot do you personally think is on the moon ? ]
I think the moon is an annunaki death star,a space battleship and perhaps its even what we call noahs ark,built in orbit around mars,as that planets biosphere was dying off and its atmosphere was fading away and the craters and surface scars on the moon may have been the result of some ancient interstellar war fought long ago,which is now all but forgotten and that ancient war may have even destroyed an entire planet or moon,remnants of which we call the asteroid belt...edit on 4-4-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
The whole notion of going to the moon with our technology that we had in the '60s is nothing short of ludicrous..
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Nonchalant
The whole notion of going to the moon with our technology that we had in the '60s is nothing short of ludicrous..
It would be as ridiculous as someone crossing the Atlantic Ocean with the technology they had in 1492. How did Columbus cross the ocean without diesel engines, radiotelephones and GPS navigation? Impossible, right?
I have to tell you DJ....... The notion of going to the moon in 1969 with that technology is kind of absurd. 10 years ago, there was a good argument about that being a silly statement but I think as we are now realizing how difficult real space travel is, it raises some questions.
Those questions in general are more about in my mind why haven't we duplicated those missions at ANY point in the here and now..... There is no good reason to answer this question. There are things you can come up with to back your ideals but that doesn't make them a good reason.
There is so much evidence of tampering, falsehoods and inconsistencies that is hard to believe even when confronted with "mainstream" facts....... I think that those "facts" are in fact starting to become under such an amount of scrutiny that they are becoming a little less reliable as "fact" and starting to serve as the the very basis of the "conspiracy".
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Helious
I have to tell you DJ....... The notion of going to the moon in 1969 with that technology is kind of absurd. 10 years ago, there was a good argument about that being a silly statement but I think as we are now realizing how difficult real space travel is, it raises some questions.
The engineers who designed and built the hardware for Apollo realized how difficult space travel was. They overcame the obstacles. Here is an example of their primitive technology:
Those questions in general are more about in my mind why haven't we duplicated those missions at ANY point in the here and now..... There is no good reason to answer this question. There are things you can come up with to back your ideals but that doesn't make them a good reason.
Do you know how much one of those puppies cost? Do I have to spell it out for you?
There is so much evidence of tampering, falsehoods and inconsistencies that is hard to believe even when confronted with "mainstream" facts....... I think that those "facts" are in fact starting to become under such an amount of scrutiny that they are becoming a little less reliable as "fact" and starting to serve as the the very basis of the "conspiracy".
Perhaps in your own mind. No Moon Hoax theorist has ever presented any credible evidence to support their case. They rely upon the ignorance of people who have a negative view of human abilities. It is necessary not to understand how shadows are cast, how photography works, elementary physics like the difference between weight and mass... then top it off with a willingness to accept outright lies and fantasies without confirming the sources or veracity, and you get the Moon Hoax Conspiracy. You are welcome to present any evidence you feel compelling, but you know already that it will not hold up.
I, believe it or not am a graduate and a science major and with that said, considering all aspects of the situation I can not realistically convince myself that we "landed" on the moon in 69. In fact, it is so laughable to me, I just can't believe sometimes that there are actually people who believe we could of done it.
Ill grant you that I was a fire science graduate and while I'm ok with math I am not "real good" and have always had to work at it although I can do it. I just have come at it a thousand ways and from my perspective...... There realistically is just no fing way.......... Not any at all, so much so that it kind of makes me chuckle.....
But.... It's not the evidence of tampering and hoaxing from the conspiracy group, its the hoaxing and tampering from NASA........ You been under a rock or something?
No, none of my opinions lie within my own mind, they lye withing the minds of hundreds of millions of people across the globe that are starting to realize that we have been lied to for a very long time and it's gotten to a point that has become ridiculous and insulting and it will be soon time to come clean.
I like you DJ, alot actually but your argument is a losing one and you will soon realize this, that said, I will always respect you and Ill even go a step further and say that I kind of like you, much like me, you always have your eye towards the sky and it makes you smile, I think we just see different things. History will decide which of us is right or wrong, we won't be able to dictate that to eachother.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Helious
I, believe it or not am a graduate and a science major and with that said, considering all aspects of the situation I can not realistically convince myself that we "landed" on the moon in 69. In fact, it is so laughable to me, I just can't believe sometimes that there are actually people who believe we could of done it.
What aspects, specifically, do you find laughabl?. You talk about the "technology of the time" as though it were stone knives and bear skin. Clearly, you were not yet born, or you would realize that all of the technology you take for granted was invented during that time; in fact, there have been no notable technological advances in half a century. Thanks to the space program's size and weight concerns, solid state technology was miniaturized and made inexpensive enough for the mass market, but the computers and telecommunications that dazzle people these days are simply variations on what was done in the 1960's.
For Gods sake man, they were wearing space suites that were hand stitched........... Come on.....
Ill grant you that I was a fire science graduate and while I'm ok with math I am not "real good" and have always had to work at it although I can do it. I just have come at it a thousand ways and from my perspective...... There realistically is just no fing way.......... Not any at all, so much so that it kind of makes me chuckle.....
If you're not real good at math, I submit that you're not in a position to know what is "realistic." If you feel the need to disparage others' accomplishments in order to feel better about yourself, you may want to work harder at achieving your own "impossible" goals.