It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NeoVain
You know what that means right? Most people see something else than you do. Maybe that is where you need to invest those resources currently spent on posts like this, if you really had an interest.
Originally posted by WingedBull
Originally posted by NeoVain
You know what that means right? Most people see something else than you do. Maybe that is where you need to invest those resources currently spent on posts like this, if you really had an interest.
Appeal to popularity. An arbitrary amount of stars and flags, or the number of posts in a thread, does not make an idea or claim valid. Something is not true simply because of the amount of people who believe it.
Here let me disprove it again for you since you obviously didn´t pay attention either.
Originally posted by NeoVain
No, they cannot dispute these facts, that is why they try to refer to my story as fact, so that they can attack it.
(emphasis mine)
Originally posted by NeoVain
Before i start i just want to say that all information in this thread is verifiable by either Nasa:s own footage on their sites or from scientists and arkeologists by searching on the internet.
Originally posted by NeoVain
Originally posted by WingedBull
Originally posted by NeoVain
You know what that means right? Most people see something else than you do. Maybe that is where you need to invest those resources currently spent on posts like this, if you really had an interest.
Appeal to popularity. An arbitrary amount of stars and flags, or the number of posts in a thread, does not make an idea or claim valid. Something is not true simply because of the amount of people who believe it.
Exactly! You have to look at the evidence. Maybe you start now?
Originally posted by NeoVain
Exactly! You have to look at the evidence. Maybe you start now?
Originally posted by WingedBull
Originally posted by NeoVain
No, they cannot dispute these facts, that is why they try to refer to my story as fact, so that they can attack it.
From the original post...
(emphasis mine)
Originally posted by NeoVain
Before i start i just want to say that all information in this thread is verifiable by either Nasa:s own footage on their sites or from scientists and arkeologists by searching on the internet.
Originally posted by NeoVain
Exactly! I thought it would be obvious what was information and what was my own conclusions for everyone, but apparently i was wrong.
Conclusions was on the house! You make up your own conclusions!edit on 16-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by camus154
Originally posted by NeoVain
Exactly! I thought it would be obvious what was information and what was my own conclusions for everyone, but apparently i was wrong.
Conclusions was on the house! You make up your own conclusions!edit on 16-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)
I'm sorry, friend, but all you seem to be doing now is riding the fence between saying it's all just a story of your own and that you have proof and evidence for that story.
In the end, then, perhaps you can do us all a favor and say once and for all that the only proof and facts you have is that an odd formation has been seen on the Sun. And that's it.
Originally posted by wolf2420
Why do the aliens want to attack us?
Originally posted by NeoVain
If you don´t call this evidence, then you do not know what evidence is.
Evidence in its broadest sense includes everything that is used to determine or demonstrate the truth of an assertion. Giving or procuring evidence is the process of using those things that are either (a) presumed to be true, or (b) were themselves proven via evidence, to demonstrate an assertion's truth. Evidence is the currency by which one fulfills the burden of proof.
Many issues surround evidence, making it the subject of much discussion and disagreement. In addition to its subtlety, evidence plays an important role in many academic disciplines, including science and law, adding to the discourse surrounding it.
An important distinction in the field of evidence is that between circumstantial evidence and direct evidence, or evidence that suggests truth as opposed to evidence that directly proves truth. Many have seen this line to be less-than-clear and significant arguments have arisen over the difference.
Originally posted by Apleness
This is ridiculous.. Where is the evidence..? By ATS evidence threads so far there wouldn't exist a planet Earth by now.
Originally posted by NeoVain
Look it up for youself, don´t be lazy. sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...
If you don´t call this evidence, then you do not know what evidence is.edit on 16-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)edit on 16-3-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)