It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If they aren't spraying our atmosphere according to the papers I've shown as proof, then they should be.
Originally posted by Afterthought
I was talking about lead fluoride reflecting gamma rays.
I stated this a couple of pages back. Try to keep up
Originally posted by maestromason
Who here has high enough USAF clearance to either confirm or deny the chem-trail conspiracy?
I eagerly standby awaiting a proper answer.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Phage
Yeah, you're right. I'm stupid. I have no idea what anything is.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Afterthought
If they aren't spraying our atmosphere according to the papers I've shown as proof, then they should be.
You haven't shown anything as proof that contrails are anything other than contrails but why "should they" being spraying?edit on 1/30/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
...and to the contrary you have not given or presented any proof that the contrails ARE NOT hazardous aerosols sprayed into the atmosphere.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Phage
Yeah, you're right. I'm stupid. I have no idea what anything is.
In my years of experience on ATS, I found that Phage is usually right.
Second line.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Phage
I have provided proof. Stop acting as though the papers and websites I've shown are nothing. You know, but won't admit, that Brookhaven National Laboratory is in on it, too. They are directly involved with operations involving man made aerosols that are being sprayed to combat climate change. Go back to page 14 where it even states that aerosols can create clouds that will deflect the sunlight.
Originally posted by maestromason
...and to the contrary you have not given or presented any proof that the contrails ARE NOT hazardous aerosols sprayed into the atmosphere.
Nobody in this thread has proven that they have ever stopped spraying, so why should I believe they have?
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
Go back to page 14.
I've proven that they have conducted spraying operations in the past, but nobody can prove they've ever quit.
There have been numerous posters besides myself who have offered evidence of past spraying, yet nobody can prove when they quit.
I wish I trusted my government so much. It's like the question in court "When did you quit beating your wife?"
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
Go back to page 14.
I've proven that they have conducted spraying operations in the past, but nobody can prove they've ever quit. There have been numerous posters besides myself who have offered evidence of past spraying, yet nobody can prove when they quit.
I wish I trusted my government so much. It's like the question in court "When did you quit beating your wife?"
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by maestromason
...and to the contrary you have not given or presented any proof that the contrails ARE NOT hazardous aerosols sprayed into the atmosphere.
sure we have - we have shown that contrails are ice crystals, and ice crystals at high altitude are not dangerous - they are cirrus clouds.
Aerosols do not need to be produced as a byproduct of industrial activity. They could be manufactured specifically to counteract greenhouse gases, for example via aerosol-producing wind-driven generators that would artificially brighten marine stratus clouds, an option that Dr. Schwartz thinks is likely to be environmentally benign.