It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by Chewingonmushrooms
So I say again, since it's the USA fault for helping fuel the fire, what can we do about? Just allow various 9/11s to happen all over the US because the Muslims fail to educate themselves properly and refuse to get rid of their religious mythology in politics?
At least we try to give these countries a chance at being led to true democracy when leaders before did not want to have anything to do with it!
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by MidnightATL
As I said before we don't force democracy we allow them to have the choice. Democracy is better than the conditional suppressing Government based on radical islam that they live under currently is it not?
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
This is all about jihad ie war against he infidels until they submit - plus 'politics is war' by the left because the only moral compass they posses is the pursuit of power. So naturally they have become bedfellows, despite Islam being everything the left 'professes' to abhor -it's like thembeing in bed with ultra fundie Christians or Jews for pete's sake!
All the rest is pure Sun Tzu - if you can prevent your enemy from even recognising they have an enemy then the war is a gauranteed win!
As for the 'war on terror' that should have been a one day bombing campaign on Mecca - Islam will only stop attacking the West whilst we have our boot firmly on their necks - sorry if you libs don't find it nuanced enough for you, but boo hoo -the truth is mostly brutally childishly simple!
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by MidnightATL
Last time I checked they get the right to choose democracy or go back to their crappy dictators.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by MidnightATL
I never justified Americas horrific foreign policy either but I understand it.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by MidnightATL
Yes it's unfortunately all in the name of globalization and making sure the world gets the same chances to succeed as Americans do. I don't see what's so bad about democracy. I honestly don't care about the wars but I understand the viewpoint. A lot of people don't want to just sit around while dictators commit horrific crimes against humanity by international law.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by MidnightATL
The only problem with your reasoning is that you think the people are a little worse off for having a dictatorship than if they had democracy. That is not the case. There are generations of people who have been taught to hate the US mixed with their own twisted delusional religious mythology. because of all that they hardly have the time or the basic right to question anything that they do. It's all mapped out for them either from tyrannical government or a religious struggle. Let them decide their own fate is not right either because they don't have that choice! The sooner libertarians understand this the better. I'm not saying that neocons are right either but I understand both viewpoints. And the Middle East people are not right
I guess my point is, I remember thinking "why do the terrorist hate us?...
I'd like to make an anology. What if a guy shoots a cop in...
Originally posted by jonnywhite
reply to post by MidnightATL
I guess my point is, I remember thinking "why do the terrorist hate us?...
You argue that OBL justified his war on the US because of US bases in Arab countries and US foreign policy towards these Arab countries (in general). You're right that Americans would not be happy if Russia had a base in Texas. But you fail to mention that we made bases in Iraq only after Saddam had continually defied the UN and forced the US to unilaterally act to stop him from further destabilizing the region (remember that Iraq nationalists long felt that Kuwait belonged to Iraq and this led to Iraq attacking Kuwait in August 1990 - keeping in mind that Iraq and Kuwait reserves are 20% of the worlds oil and that this would solve Iraq's debt problems that had accrued during the Iraq/Iran war) and killing more people (it's estimated he killed in excess of 1 million people over the course of his time as president of Iraq) and preventing him from potentially being a terrorist hotbed (there were signs of this). I'm skipping a lot, but in total, we may have built bases in Iraq, and this might have encouraged terrorists like OBL to engage the US on bolder terms, but it was not the US that drew first blood.
I'd like to make an anology. What if a guy shoots a cop in...
Is a great analogy. And at length, I find myself having to agree with you. It's true that we can be filled with blood lust and a single-minded nature and fail to negotiate the twisting turns of reality when in hot pursuit of our target. All true. But sometimes we don't have much choice. If you pull back and let your target escape, then it's claimed you failed and did not do your job. If you succeed in apprehending your target but fail to prevent injuries to innocents then you're claimed to be careless and and so on. But we also have to account for the fact that this is a WAR and not a domestic concern. When we invaded Iraq in 2003, it was openly said among politicians and leaders that this was a WAR. And in wars there's collateral damage. This means innocents will die. So to a large extent, the failure to prevent the deaths of innocents is forgiveable.
There's another thing.
Should we trust soldiers to be critical of their own organization - that supports them?
Go here:
www.psychologicalscience.o rg ...
This leads one to believe that soldiers should not be the ones to oversee the military. This is because they depend on the military for their income AND are under constant threat from outside enemies that threaten the whole of the country and the integrity of the military they serve.
So considering any government branch, we need to have independent committees.edit on 23-12-2011 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Only a tiny minority of Muslims are terrorists..
Originally posted by Pervius
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Only a tiny minority of Muslims are terrorists..
The Land of Mecca still chops off peoples heads who are Jewish or carry a bible.
The Jewish religion is a HATE religion because it's based upon a bloodline. If you ain't part of that bloodline you can't join.
The Muslim religion also thinks they are elite and everyone else is dirt.
Both religions are Terrorists responsible for the deaths over the centuries. Christians also have had their religious conquests and killing...
Religion is the true Terrorist. Proof that there ain't no ""God"". We just use Religion to clan together and conquest/kill. It's pretty sick really.
Originally posted by Pervius
The Jewish religion is a HATE religion because it's based upon a bloodline. If you ain't part of that bloodline you can't join.