It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by el1jah
I highly doubt that most Occupy folks want to confront the police.
Where I live, the local Occupy movement is taking a lot of flack from the local Gannett-owned daily as well as the local Fox station, which sent a reporter undercover to report back on the movement (probably a plant to stir up trouble). The media started with talks about the cold weather and now there's been a (self-inflicted) shooting. They seemingly will do anything to get these people to go home, which is why people must stand their ground.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Never in my life has a cop ever laid an hand on me or club me and it takes 2 for that little dance.
Action envisioned include:
a mass of people, singing and chanting, circling the encampment Saturday night on foot and bicycle;bikeportland.org...
www.crankmychain.com...
food: empanadas, pizza, cake, locally-grown fruits and vegetables;
music: guitars, drums, shakers, singalongs;
more signs: creative signs, funny signs, home-made signs with memorable slogans;
playful costumes (warm and fuzzy ones, bunny suits, Portland at its weird and wonderful best);
dancing all night long.
Mike Withey, a member of the finance and safety committees, tells WW that police told him they had recovered stashes of flares from a tent, and they found wooden planks placed beneath park railings with nails facing up. He also said he had seen planks with nails hammered in them stacked at the chessboards in Lownsdale Plaza.
"There are some people [in camp] who are so mentally and emotionally underdeveloped that they would" dig holes and hide in trees, said Reid Parham, an Occupy Portland media committee member. "The justifications they create for violent confrontations are not appropriate, not productive, and I'm kind of at a loss for how to talk them down."
Originally posted by dc4lifeskater
Would you have said that to our founding fathers? You think they won the war with peaceful protesting?
If it were up to you we would be speaking proper english and having a spot of tea every afternoon spending our quid on liters of petrol.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
I really don't see anything happening anytime soon. I'd like to see police ban hiring of soldiers who have been in warzones and drastically increase the number of females on the force, as well as completely remodeling the way the police structure is set up .. which is much like the military.
Originally posted by MegasAlexandros
...
If only I were in command. We would be sitting on the White House lawn.
Originally posted by Resinveins
reply to post by jcord
My integrity matters more to me than worrying over that. It's really that simple.
Originally posted by Resinveins
reply to post by jcord
My integrity matters more to me than worrying over that. It's really that simple.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
...
(and to all those who will flame me for being against soldiers being cops .. there is a reason why our founding fathers expressly forbade the military from police duties. Hiring soldiers as police officers is absolutely no different than having the military as our police.)edit on 11/12/2011 by Rockpuck because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
...
As-written by those "founding fathers," we are a slave nation where only the wealthy are permitted to wield any political power, where half of our legislative branch is to be installed at the whim of the executive branch.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Our first handful of acts as a nascent nation were to smash agrarian uprisings of poor renters who wanted a say in governance, a protracted war of extermination against our western neighbors in the Iroquois League, and siding with the french to use our naval power to make sure the self-liberated slaves of Haiti paid their former masters back with interest for all that lost "property."
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Point is, they weren't prophets and the constitution is not holy writ. If you want to fall to your knees in worship at the National Archives, feel free to go do that. Just know that it's awfully silly.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
...
As-written by those "founding fathers," we are a slave nation where only the wealthy are permitted to wield any political power, where half of our legislative branch is to be installed at the whim of the executive branch.
Really?... And where exactly is that writtten in the Constitution?... or did you just made that up?...
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Our first handful of acts as a nascent nation were to smash agrarian uprisings of poor renters who wanted a say in governance, a protracted war of extermination against our western neighbors in the Iroquois League, and siding with the french to use our naval power to make sure the self-liberated slaves of Haiti paid their former masters back with interest for all that lost "property."
You surely have a knack for twisting history for your party's agenda...
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Point is, they weren't prophets and the constitution is not holy writ. If you want to fall to your knees in worship at the National Archives, feel free to go do that. Just know that it's awfully silly.
What is awfully silly is to believe one such as you.
What sort of government you want?... I am pretty sure it sides on the far left of the equation right?... Or am I wrong?...