It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well either way you look at it, we decided to no longer use the bushmen methods for living. I think your still wrong because this is a fact.
Again you show the reading skills of a chimp and the intelligence of a chump.
The bushmen exist alive and well today along side our modern society which shows again your take on it must be one or the other, like all your uninformed tripe is wrong even when the evidence is infront of your face.
You must have no life experience at all if you believe it to be so black and white. Again you are avoiding addressing the points I made by these cretinous questions
Did you know every generation believes the next is somehow inferior. This has been see as far back as early greek manuscripts. Its part of the condition but in reality there were no 'good old days'
All you have to do is go out among people to see we've moved backwards.
Because we have lost the knowledge of how the pyramids were built does not mean we could not re-discover the technology but to be fair we dont build that way so why would we? The xtal skull I believe was shown to be fake long ago and a backstreet industry discovered making the very skulls we are not meant to be able to produce today on a grinding wheel no less.
None today could replicate Miccu Piccu, the Great Pyramid, or the Mitchell-Hedges skull, much less explain their presence.
If that was so why do we not use the astrolabe today instead of that silly Satellite system. Why wouldnt there be batteries from that age it is pretty simple chemistry after all.
There is a 2000 year old astrolabe/navigating tool that worked better than computer programs, and batteries that date in the thousands.
Not that I have read much on this subject there are other explanations than the one you infer but I agree it is very interesting
Lets not forget the vitrified bodies on the outskirts of India with the insanely high radioactive readings.
Sorry not getting the point
This is a proving ground and a petri dish with largely failed experiments.
Darwins theories were about the life on this planet. That life includes ALL primates of which we are part.
Deity are all political invention and an excuse to not think for oneself, and Darwin's theories are best exemplified in the natural world which is a world without human beings.
Please expand.
People don't even have the physical integrity to do what they did 100 years ago, films prove this.
Why the milk-drinking slide? First, many U.S. groups simply do not drink much, or any, milk -- including ethnic minorities, those who are lactose intolerant or allergic, dieters, the health conscious, and vegans. Kids themselves often dislike milk -- probably why they invented chocolate and flavored milk -- and it is often the last choice among teens and tweens, on whom much milk marketing is focused. Healthcare professionals, unless subsidized by the dairy industry, seldom recommend milk because of its cholesterol, fat, calories, allergens and impurities and its possible links to rBGH (recombinant bovine growth hormone) since milk made with the cow milk enhancer has never been labeled. Benjamin Spock, the famous baby boom-era pediatrician, recommended no milk for children after age two to reduce their risks of heart disease, obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, and diet-related cancers.
Health professionals also disputed the bone claims. A 2001 USDA expert panel report said that calcium intake by itself, as milk offers, does not prevent osteoporosis because exercise and nutrients other than calcium are part of the bone health picture. Panelists also said whole milk could increase the risk of prostate cancer and heart disease and ads should include such warnings.
I am at a loss on how to get anything past that dense skull of yours.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
Well either way you look at it, we decided to no longer use the bushmen methods for living.
Again you show the reading skills of a chimp and the intelligence of a chump.
The bushmen exist alive and well today along side our modern society which shows again your take on it must be one or the other, like all your uninformed tripe is wrong even when the evidence is infront of your face.
You must have no life experience at all if you believe it to be so black and white. Again you are avoiding addressing the points I made by these cretinous questions
Probably because your having a problem getting out of your own skull.
I am at a loss on how to get anything past that dense skull of yours.
Bushmen still live as bushmen. Certain tribes fight for the right to continue that life style when our civilisation threatens it. The world does not revolve around you or Spokane.
Well I don't need to look to far, there are no bushmen in Spokane, I wonder why that is.
It is not an either or situation. There are many societies with even more variances of lifestyle. Because the world differs from the way you have decided it must be to back up your frankly childish version is your problem, get over it.
Until you decide to look further than your bedroom door you will always be ignorant and always be wrong in everything your fantasy tells you is true.
Exactly, now what is speciation based on, now there is a problem.
We have witnessed speciation both in the lab and in nature: LINK
And that's not a belief, those are facts
We are also actively applying the theory in modern medicine, so if it were wrong, we wouldn't have a lot of the treatments we have today...
Originally posted by HappyBunny
Originally posted by MrXYZ
That clown claims humans have been on earth for millions (or billions) of years. DNA analysis and the fossil record both prove that this clearly isn't the case.
The only reason he ignores science is because it disagrees with his creationist views. Nothing he claims is based on facts or objective evidence...
The "evidence" he bases his conclusions on is 1) very old; and 2) very limited. He thinks H. sapiens is millions of years old based on a single femur if I recall correctly.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Exactly, now what is speciation based on, now there is a problem.
We have witnessed speciation both in the lab and in nature: LINK
And that's not a belief, those are facts
We are also actively applying the theory in modern medicine, so if it were wrong, we wouldn't have a lot of the treatments we have today...
No really the problem is all yours.
Probably because your having a problem getting out of your own skull.
The bottom line is you are just to ignorant to be real. Go live the life of the bushmen. I would give you about a second before you start blubbing and calling for mummy and a comfortable bed.
The bottom line is, we don't all follow the bushman. Common sense says there is a very good reason for this.
They are afraid you may wreck their gene pool
Well I don't need to look to far, there are no bushmen in Spokane, I wonder why that is.
Originally posted by Star128
Let's not forget the helicopter in the heiroglyphs, and that other minor details; we # where we eat.
It seems to me many of you DO expect to be spoon fed. No one can force thought, evidence of this fact is everywhere.
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."
Nope but yours does
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
Your lack of knowledge doesn't make me to be a troll.
The bushman has no interest to me. He has nothing to do with the understanding of where we are today with the possible exception of hunting skills.
The bottom line is you are just to ignorant to be real. Go live the life of the bushmen. I would give you about a second before you start blubbing and calling for mummy and a comfortable bed.
Everything that protects you has been invented by man that enable cretins like you to exist when in the natural world you would not.
It is however not the only way man lives and again every variation shows you wrong from milk to vaccines through food and onwards to our otherworldly hands that you say have no purpose.
As you have shown in your reply to connector you are nothing more than a very poor troll.
Originally posted by dplum517
A better question would be, can you prove evolution right?
If so, then you can answer this: What is the Origin of a cell?
Originally posted by discountgenetics
Archaeologists may have found the oldest indication of human civilization, and it's not in Africa. Embedded in meteorite rocks, they found samples of hand-axes dating back to 1.8 million years in Malaysia, supporting the multiregional theory for human origins.