It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How thick an answer is that. You link to info about the bushman and then say we no longer do that. I should not have taken it for granted that you had read your own link.
Well like I said, its already proven, we no longer do that.
What are you taking that disables your reasoning power so bad that it becomes non existant. Again you tell me what you believe with nothing to back it up.
I never said we weren't at one time, what I'm trying to say is I don't believe it was how we were suppose to be.
Dam you are just the most saddest person I have ever met. I dont know if this answer is a complete and utter dishonest deflection of how wrong you are or that you have a memory that would make a flee blush with shame.
Which link are you talking about?
I replied
I think if we were, we would have stayed that way, its another sign of, you guess it, humans not being from here.
Actually I think it is worth asking again. Do you know what a bushman is?
BTW from your link you have proved many people have stayed that way. Its another sign of, you guessed it your wrong
Originally posted by DorkLard
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by DorkLard
Glad you agree RH negative has nothing to do with not having a common ancestor with today's monkeys
And of course you shouldn't listen to a physics teacher when talking about RH factors...as this would be "biology" and not "physics"
You also don't ask a cosmologist to treat a tumour...edit on 13-3-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
I never stated that i spoke to a physics teacher about biology merely I was making a simile that you can not dismiss people's theories based on their religious beliefs.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MrXYZ
I have already X they don't really fit to well here so I leave the integrety of the site to you as far as this thread is concerned. I'm sure your worthy my man. Just don't go off thinking I'm afraid of you my worthy nenesis.edit on 13-3-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DorkLard
reply to post by HappyBunny
I think you are trying to pick at something that isn't there; since your comments all started after i posted a video of Michael Cremo I would like to know have you actually read one of his books or are you just regurgitating what other people have written about him rather than making your own mind up ?
Now be honest.
And you would know this how? You did not even look at your own links information.
Unless hes eating the bones for calcium, hes not.
And that is a reply to me writing nowhere in your links to recommended diets does it say we must drink milk?
No where, which is the basis for my argument.
This answer may explain your fascination for calcium. You’re an utter bonehead.
True but unless you live in 4 different areas at the same time, you won’t have access to them all.
Oh dear, your wandering again mate. Wipe the drawl from your chin as you dont want that on your keyboard and then explain what the hell that is meant to mean
No I think its because your saturation of my replies is 0.
Not evolution, but belief in evolution,yes.
Can you prove evolution wrong?*
Originally posted by DorkLard
reply to post by MrXYZ
I take it you haven't read one of his books either then ?
I have read one of his books, and I came to the conclusion that I have done with many theories and that is, nobody can be 100% right.
Originally posted by diamondsmith
Not evolution, but belief in evolution,yes.
Can you prove evolution wrong?*
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by DorkLard
reply to post by MrXYZ
I take it you haven't read one of his books either then ?
I have read one of his books, and I came to the conclusion that I have done with many theories and that is, nobody can be 100% right.
Again, his base claim has been proven to be 100% wrong
Originally posted by DorkLard
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by DorkLard
reply to post by MrXYZ
I take it you haven't read one of his books either then ?
I have read one of his books, and I came to the conclusion that I have done with many theories and that is, nobody can be 100% right.
Again, his base claim has been proven to be 100% wrong
Could you provide proof rather than speculationedit on 13-3-2012 by DorkLard because: (no reason given)
I don't, I was making it up about eating bones.
And you would know this how? You did not even look at your own links information.
I think should would be a better word.
And that is a reply to me writing nowhere in your links to recommended diets does it say we must drink milk?
The basis of your argument is that we all must drink milk. Pages of the same rubbish.
Well how else would you explain the bushman getting all of his sources, or wait, does he wait for the big truck to roll into town.
This answer may explain your fascination for calcium. You’re an utter bonehead.
It means that I have to keep telling you the same things all over.
Oh dear, your wandering again mate. Wipe the drawl from your chin as you dont want that on your keyboard and then explain what the hell that is meant to mean
Well how else would you explain the bushman getting all of his sources, or wait, does he wait for the big truck to roll into town.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by DorkLard
I found a Cremo book once on a train. Long journey and nothing better to do I started reading it until staring out the window became more interesting. It was rubbish.
But I look at that book like a virus. People pick it up; suffer with it for a while put it down for the next poor sap to pick up. This goes on until it is picked up by someone susceptible who goes for the full infection. Please don’t tell me you are the one that kept the book.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by DorkLard
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by DorkLard
reply to post by MrXYZ
I take it you haven't read one of his books either then ?
I have read one of his books, and I came to the conclusion that I have done with many theories and that is, nobody can be 100% right.
Again, his base claim has been proven to be 100% wrong
Could you provide proof rather than speculationedit on 13-3-2012 by DorkLard because: (no reason given)
There you go...
It should be evident why that clown's claims are nonsense, we haven't found a single homo sapiens fossil older than 200,000 years. If humans had lived for millions or billions of years, there would be archeological evidence, just like we have evidence of dinosaurs living millions of years ago.
Oh a surprise. You made something up to avoid answering a question. How not new.
I don't, I was making it up about eating bones.
No 'should ' is not a better word. 'Should' some people drink milk they 'would' die. Milk as you have been told many times is a convienance food that many cannot drink.
I think should would be a better word.
If you had taken the time to read your own link about the bushman you would know the answer. Shame on you.
Well how else would you explain the bushman getting all of his sources, or wait, does he wait for the big truck to roll into town.
Ah, music to my ears. Now you know what its like for us. Here's the deal. You change your record and I will sing a different song. Till then.
It means that I have to keep telling you the same things all over.