It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tangonine
Pretty sure you're missing the part where they DNA'd his body prior to dumping it into the sea to ensure it was him.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by waypastvne
So, no URL to the site that shows the forensic method used to match the parts to the flights that allegedly left the airports?
I have been involved in aircraft accident investigations. The NTSB has never asked me as the manufacturer to positively identify the aircraft by forensic means.
Can you prove this part is not from N 612 UA Truther ?
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by tangonine
Pretty sure you're missing the part where they DNA'd his body prior to dumping it into the sea to ensure it was him.
Mission control to tango-nine! Come in tango-nine!
Mission control to tango-nine! Come in tango-nine!
Damn it! We lost him!
He went down in an inglorious blaze sir!
Duuuuude!!! Nooooooo!!!!
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
Oh boy, when all else fails, they drag out the "I witnessed it" story.
Haven't heard that one before.
If you witnessed a plane entering a building like a hot knife through butter, you witnessed the same thing the rest of us did. A movie.
No. Genius. I was there.
The maneuver at the Pentagon was just a tight spiral coming down out of 7,000 feet. And a commercial aircraft, while they can in fact structurally somewhat handle that maneuver, they are very, very, very difficult. And it would take considerable training. In other words, commercial aircraft are designed for a particular purpose and that is for comfort and for passengers and it's not for military maneuvers. And while they are structurally capable of doing them, it takes some very, very talented pilots to do that. ... When a commercial airplane gets that high, it gets very, very close to getting into what you refer to as a speed high-speed stall. And a high-speed stall can be very, very violent on a commercial-type aircraft and you never want to get into that situation. I just can't imagine an amateur even being able to come close to performing a maneuver of that nature. And as far as hijacking the airplanes, once again getting back to the nature of pilots and airplanes, there is no way that a pilot would give up an airplane to hijackers. ... I mean, hell, a guy doesn't give up a TV remote control much less a complicated 757. And so to think that pilots would allow a plane to be taken over by a couple of 5 foot 7, 150 pound guys with a one-inch blade boxcutter is ridiculous. And also in all four planes, if you remember, none of the planes ever switched on their transponder to the hijack code. There's a very, very simple code that you put in if you suspect that your plane is being hijacked. It takes literally just a split-second for you to put your hand down on the center console and flip it over. And not one of the four planes ever transponded a hijack code, which is most, most unusual. ... Commercial airplanes are very, very complex pieces of machines. And they're designed for two pilots up there, not just two amateur pilots, but two qualified commercial pilots up there. And to think that you're going to get an amateur up into the cockpit and fly, much less navigate, it to a designated target, the probability is so low, that it's bordering on impossible."
"Almost nothing in the "official" 9-11 account proves to be factual. For all the purported U.S. failures; no one was punished - most were rewarded. At the 9-11 Pentagon, the world witnessed a fire and suggestions of explosions. Airport fire trucks rushed to the scene of a purported “crash” site - without discovering an airplane. There is no viable evidence of burning jet fuel. Just the statement, "They say it was an airplane." The pre-collapse Pentagon section showed no ‘forward-moving’ damage. The damage is at the wrong location. The expected “crash” damage doesn't exist. There was no particular physical evidence of the expected "wreckage." There was no tail, no wings; no damage consistent with a B-757 “crash.” Even the Pentagon lawn was undamaged! The geometry of the day certifies the ‘official’ account as a blatant lie. The few aircraft parts discovered at the Pentagon are highly suspect. The dramatic "witness" accounts lack supporting physical evidence - with the exception of those who described the incredibly few aircraft parts. All images show that the building wasn't aggressively searched for survivors. Lacking any 'expected' clues, one is left to ask "Who said this was an airplane crash, in the first place?" The purported Flight 93 crash site in Pennsylvania is quite similar. Since 9-11, it was discovered that there was no expected Air Force fighter response. By all appearances, the expected fighters were held back from interfering with; or witnessing the unfolding events. The fighter onboard electronics would have not only offered an intercept target, but would have displayed and recorded the forbidden reality of the day. Of particular interest would be the fate of two obviously missing airliners. The alleged hijackers apparently were not on board the aircraft! Their names were not on any passenger manifests - yet shown. The ‘names’ of at least seven of the alleged hijackers were discovered to be still alive - with no questions being asked about whom the real hijackers were. No attempt has been made to discover the “known terrorists.” There were at least four hijackers – all evidence pointing to their being highly qualified jet pilots - not zealous Arab wannabes. As the names of “al Qaeda” and “bin Laden” continue to be pandered in the shadows of ‘terrorism,' journalists continue to discover that the bin Laden family was given the treatment of royalty, immediately following 9-11. ...
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
Oh boy, when all else fails, they drag out the "I witnessed it" story.
Haven't heard that one before.
If you witnessed a plane entering a building like a hot knife through butter, you witnessed the same thing the rest of us did. A movie.
No. Genius. I was there.
uh oh, this is going to get interesting.... someone who claims that they were there when it happened? tell us the details please......and don't miss a lick because I'll check up on every word you say.....
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
Oh boy, when all else fails, they drag out the "I witnessed it" story.
Haven't heard that one before.
If you witnessed a plane entering a building like a hot knife through butter, you witnessed the same thing the rest of us did. A movie.
No. Genius. I was there.
uh oh, this is going to get interesting.... someone who claims that they were there when it happened? tell us the details please......and don't miss a lick because I'll check up on every word you say.....
Dennis Cimino – Commercial pilot rating for over 25 years. Systems Engineer. Navy Combat Systems Specialist (Radar, ECM, UHF/VHF/HF COMMS., GPS, INS, SATNAV, cryptographic communications). Millimeter wave RADAR and countermeasures expert since 1973. Two patents held for Doppler RADAR. Former Flight Data Recorder Engineer, Smiths Aerospace. Statement to this website 6/3/07: "I have been a licensed pilot with a commercial rating, multi-engine, IFR, since 1981. Prior to that I served as an Electronic Warfare / Electronic Signals Intelligence (EW ELINT) specialist in the U.S. Navy, with many 'first time' signal intercepts in the national (NSA) sigint database. Since I left the Navy in 1979, I have been heavily involved in DoD weapons system testing and certification. I have held high level clearances most of my career. There is no doubt in my mind that what transpired on September 11, 2001, was an inside job carried out by members of our own government. Based on my experience as a commercial pilot, I do not believe that it's possible for four large commercial airliners to have gone off course for as long as they did and as far as they did and were not intercepted by Air Force pilots, without the explicit cooperation of highly placed people in the military and government. I also do not believe that both of the WTC Twin Towers could have been identically pulverized and that both identically collapsed into their own footprints as a result of a single airplane impact and the fire from a few thousand gallons of jet fuel. I also do not believe that WTC Building 7, which wasn't even hit by an airplane, could have entirely collapsed as a result of a few fires, particularly in a manner that is entirely consistent with a controlled demolition. Additionally, the visible evidence at the Pentagon is inconsistent with an impact by a Boeing 757. There was virtually no debris from the 80-ton airplane, except a few small pieces that were picked up by hand. Nor was there any evidence of holes in the building that surely would have resulted from the impacts of the two 6-ton RB-211 engines on the alleged Boeing 757. Similarly, at Shanksville, PA, the small gash in the earth is far too small to have resulted from the impact of a Boeing 757. All of these factors have convinced me that our government was fully onboard with what took place on 9/11. The official account of 9/11 is absolute B.S. We, as citizens of this great country, need to do research, question the government, and demand a full, impartial investigation to determine what actually took place that day."
Originally posted by MamaJ
If I had lost a loved one on that day...It would be my lifes mission to get to the bottom of what really happened on September 11!!!! I would fight tooth and nail to KNOW. I would want the truth for all involved.
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
Oh boy, when all else fails, they drag out the "I witnessed it" story.
Haven't heard that one before.
If you witnessed a plane entering a building like a hot knife through butter, you witnessed the same thing the rest of us did. A movie.
No. Genius. I was there.
uh oh, this is going to get interesting.... someone who claims that they were there when it happened? tell us the details please......and don't miss a lick because I'll check up on every word you say.....
I was there. 14 blocks away. But anyone can google a location and say they were there. So it's pretty pointless.
I was in NY visiting my daughter. She got knocked up by some dude from Newburgh. Me being Italian, I flew in to tell her she'd be fine. 2d day into the trip, I was in her apt when the news came on CNN and people were going ape#.
That's all you get.edit on 17-8-2011 by tangonine because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by tangonine
Pretty sure you're missing the part where they DNA'd his body prior to dumping it into the sea to ensure it was him.
Mission control to tango-niner! Come in tango-niner!
Mission control to tango-niner! Come in tango-niner!
Damn it! We lost him!
He went down in an inglorious blaze sir!
Duuuuude!!! Nooooooo!!!!
He just didna believe. Or maybe he believed too dang much!
'He just hadna got the pirr, ka-pin'.
edit on 17-8-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by pshea38
Oh no doubt......the more I dig in regards to this subject the angrier I become. I have to calm myself down when I research this topic. It is unbelievable what "they" have tried to cover up. They also really suck at doing so.
Originally posted by Yankee451
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by tangonine
Pretty sure you're missing the part where they DNA'd his body prior to dumping it into the sea to ensure it was him.
Mission control to tango-niner! Come in tango-niner!
Mission control to tango-niner! Come in tango-niner!
Damn it! We lost him!
He went down in an inglorious blaze sir!
Duuuuude!!! Nooooooo!!!!
He just didna believe. Or maybe he believed too dang much!
'He just hadna got the pirr, ka-pin'.
edit on 17-8-2011 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)
HAHAHA...
I'm crying over here!edit on 17-8-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
Oh boy, when all else fails, they drag out the "I witnessed it" story.
Haven't heard that one before.
If you witnessed a plane entering a building like a hot knife through butter, you witnessed the same thing the rest of us did. A movie.
No. Genius. I was there.
uh oh, this is going to get interesting.... someone who claims that they were there when it happened? tell us the details please......and don't miss a lick because I'll check up on every word you say.....
I was there. 14 blocks away. But anyone can google a location and say they were there. So it's pretty pointless.
I was in NY visiting my daughter. She got knocked up by some dude from Newburgh. Me being Italian, I flew in to tell her she'd be fine. 2d day into the trip, I was in her apt when the news came on CNN and people were going ape#.
That's all you get.edit on 17-8-2011 by tangonine because: (no reason given)
ok, so you didn't see what happened...in fact, you didn't even know about it till the news came on and you were 14 blocks away? wtf?
We might hate each other, but that was some funny sht.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
We might hate each other, but that was some funny sht.
Aww man....you killed my buzz. I don't hate you...and I'm pretty sure you don't hate me.
I have run into several people who have claimed they saw or know someone who saw the jet, and in each case they can't offer anything other than the claim.
It is my personal opinion JASSM missiles were used, and I believe that if I saw or heard a 500 MPH JASSM out of the corner of my eyes, and then heard about jets hitting the towers, and then watched it on TV, I'd probably be convinced I saw a jet too.
I wanted to know your location because then it's easier to see what you might have seen at the time...sure I wanted to "bust" you, but I am also very fascinated by the subject, and I think every first hand account is important for everyone's understanding.
If I had seen a jet, clearly, I'd come out swinging and clobber folks with that out of the gate...this is my first encounter with you, far as I know, and unlike the others, you did indeed segue to the eye-witness pretty quickly.
I think you saw a missile, but I don't know jack and I wasn't there.
Tell us what you saw, please.
edit on 17-8-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by tangonine
We might hate each other, but that was some funny sht.
Aww man....you killed my buzz. I don't hate you...and I'm pretty sure you don't hate me.
I have run into several people who have claimed they saw or know someone who saw the jet, and in each case they can't offer anything other than the claim.
It is my personal opinion JASSM missiles were used, and I believe that if I saw or heard a 500 MPH JASSM out of the corner of my eyes, and then heard about jets hitting the towers, and then watched it on TV, I'd probably be convinced I saw a jet too.
I wanted to know your location because then it's easier to see what you might have seen at the time...sure I wanted to "bust" you, but I am also very fascinated by the subject, and I think every first hand account is important for everyone's understanding.
If I had seen a jet, clearly, I'd come out swinging and clobber folks with that out of the gate...this is my first encounter with you, far as I know, and unlike the others, you did indeed segue to the eye-witness pretty quickly.
I think you saw a missile, but I don't know jack and I wasn't there.
Tell us what you saw, please.
edit on 17-8-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)