911 The facts and the proof only., page 19
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 03:53 PM by dpd11
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to
post by Yankee451



What do you think Yank, will dpd show ? Am I not practically catering or what?

I know I posted my previous reply, when he was still on line and now he splits with out a word.
edit on 22-8-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)


What, do you think I live on here?

Yeah, I give up... I guess you're too smart for me. Continue on with your imaginary 'fact finding' mission. Make sure to exclude and/or shoot down anything that doesn't favor all of your illogical theories. You know... Stuff like a freakin' airplane wheel sitting in the middle of the street. I'm sure it's all part of the plot. LOL


reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 04:04 PM by Yankee451
reply to post by dpd11





What, do you think I live on here?

Yeah, I give up... I guess you're too smart for me. Continue on with your imaginary 'fact finding' mission. Make sure to exclude and/or shoot down anything that doesn't favor all of your illogical theories. You know... Stuff like a freakin' airplane wheel sitting in the middle of the street. I'm sure it's all part of the plot. LOL


If these facts are imaginary, what's keeping you from correcting the record with your own facts?

Why squirm and avoid eye contact?

Man up, stop rationalizing, and give us the facts that support the OS...should be simple if our argument is so ridiculous.


reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 09:26 PM by dpd11
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to
post by Yankee451



I like that perfectly fine as retort.


Of course you do... You'd agree with him if he said Smurfs rode flying pink horses, and took down the buildings with magical fairy dust.


reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 09:59 PM by patternfinder
well, i can tell you this, there is so much gained through this 9/11 event that it's like trying to name all the drops of water in a lake....if i were to try to take over the world what would i do? i'd first take the advice of herman goerring,

quotes.liberty-tree.ca...

""Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."



and since the protocols agree with it, it must be right......
misclassified.cz.cc...

The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces - are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.



and of course, pnac agrees with it totally.....

www.newamericancentury.org...

• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future; • we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values; • we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad; • we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.


and then, i'd have to explain to my fellow pnac members that we need a new pearl harbor event to get this thing going.....

www.newamericancentury.org...

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like A NEW PEARL HARBOR.



then, when i've completed the new pearl harbor event, i shall make sure some of the news broadcasters call it a new pearl harbor event......




reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 10:11 PM by randyvs
reply to post by dpd11



Wow guy, If I were the sensitive type ? You might of just of hurt my feeling by now. After all I've done for you ?
Then again, I'm not the sensitve type at at all. And I've had far worse said about me, by far better than you. But it is amusing watching you play this game of tag by yourself so by all means. Don't stop now. By the time you're done, you may find out just how intellectually abrasive I can be, my patriotic zombie.

How about something on topic before you derail this puppy ? Ya think?
edit on 23-8-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 10:32 PM by randyvs
reply to post by patternfinder



Why can't the OSers come up with anything like this ? Hey nice post Pattern, I don't know if Ican list any facts from it just yet.
I don't want to get to far out front of the OS at this point, because they seem to get so depressed and unwilling.
edit on 23-8-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 11:53 PM by Yankee451
reply to post by dpd11





Of course you do... You'd agree with him if he said Smurfs rode flying pink horses, and took down the buildings with magical fairy dust.


Can't blame the guy for agreeing with me, I'm right.

So far you've only offered us some faeries and pink horses, so I'm assuming you know I'm right too, or you'd offer stuff like "facts and proof".


reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 08:19 PM by Yankee451
reply to post by randyvs



I think number 4. needs to be attributed to the NYPD....I'm not sure I can bear seeing my name attributed to planes being used...


reply posted on 5-9-2011 @ 02:32 PM by randyvs
reply to post by Yankee451



So far the facts are ...Update.


1.The core columns were compromised.

2. No video or image can be trusted.( This really is a neutral fact ).

3.. The demolition of the twin towers had been previously planned in the late 80's. (yank)

4. Planes definetly hit the twin towers. ( NYPD )

5.FBI has not revised their original 19 suspects even though they believe some used false IDs ( Yank )

6. Jane Stanley of the BBC was suddenly capable of forcasting future events. She reported that building 7 had also collapsed a full 15 minutes BEFORE it actually came crashing down.

At your request Yank.
Are you fricken happy now ?



reply posted on 8-9-2011 @ 03:25 PM by marzabeth
reply to post by randyvs



The Nuclear Bomb dropped on Hiroshima is probably one of the most destructive acts committed by modern man and yet buildings were left standing. Two aluminum planes later and three modern buildings were completely decimated...I am sure the damage inflicted upon WTC 1 and 2 was great and the fire horrendous but enough to level them to piles of dust? Building seven had damage and fire caused by debris but I don't believe either was enough to cause complete and utter demolition to the point of solid concrete turning into dust. Please watch the vintage film reel depicting the damage to Hiroshima and Nagasaki to see the effects on the structures there and then tell me whether or not what happened to the World Trade Center is reasonable. Maybe I'm comparing apples to oranges but I would certainly expect the damage done by an atomic bomb would be more complete than two airplanes.

General Effects of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
edit on 8-9-2011 by marzabeth because: video and link not working



reply posted on 16-9-2011 @ 01:06 PM by randyvs
edit on 16-9-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-10-2011 @ 01:57 AM by septic
reply to post by randyvs



Here's a morsel for you:

Minoru Yamasaki was chosen as architect probably because of his past history as a great guy for building things that needed to be destroyed.

A building commissioned in 1951 by the Department of Defense was built without a sprinkler system, and then burned in a spectacular fire. That building, the U.S. Military Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, housed 38 million individual service records and 4,000 employees. When it was completed in 1956, the six-story concrete and aluminum behemoth was one of the twenty largest buildings in the world.

Today, the Personnel Records Center informs those seeking information that, as a result of the fire, it cannot provide access to 80 percent of army files on personnel discharged between 1912 and 1960, as well as 75 percent of air force personnel discharged between 1947 and 1964. Information about hundreds of thousands of veterans vanished from the face of the earth. The building survived.


americancity.org...
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags