If you still do not understand what Balsamo/TigerTracks ( and -PLB- asking questions and handing over the answers far too fast to ever been able to
plot all the thousands of lat/long datapoints in his posting-times time frame ) did wrong when he overlaid two different pictures with clearly
different dimensions, at least you can see it here in my picture I already posted, but where no one commented on, while it is the 100 % proof that
Balsamo is trying to trick his own membership, and us, the occasional readers from his "experts" forum, in believing in a Northern departure gate,
as he still claims today in his (already slightly "corrected" by means of an additional overlayed STILL WRONG new picture) front page article :
I used Balsamo's own picture with ONLY the distorted 3000+ ft shifted from reality and decoded from that false-FDR, original non-corrected lat/long
data points, plotted by Balsamo himself from the UnderTow datastream, in it :
UnderTow's "full", world-first decode ever (it's not full by far, it does not have the earlier flights in it) :
Open this UnderTow (now proved falsified) FDR datapoints listing in a new browser tab by right clicking this link and clicking "Open in new Tab"
You can find the navigational data easily in that list. Look for lat and long descriptions in the top line. There are two sets in every subframe
numbered line, and every subframe numbered line is spaced one second apart from the next one.
This is Balsamo's original picture from his front page article :
Article title : AA77 - Gate position.
Balsamo's original picture : pilotsfor911truth.org...
Thus, NO overlay from him used in his own stand-alone picture there.
Now follows one simple new picture made by me, together with one simple solution offered months after that by me.
This is how he SHOULD have done it, working in one and the same picture to construct the shift to reality of the false AA77 FDR lat/long data-points
My exact lat/long offset corrections outcome is shown by me in Balsamo's own picture, leading to the right departure gate, Gate D18. Original Size
816px × 984px.
Especially when you move my correction line 38 meters southwards and 43 meters westwards (I'll explain that later) under my thin blue departure line
along the D-Concourse, beginning at the yellow M2 point :
My original picture : files.abovetopsecret.com...
Use CTRL and + repeatedly, to blow up (zoom in) your browser page, and then these pictures will be much clearer to view !
Use your free Windows Paint program, expand/zoom to 200 %, and draw your own thin lines when you still can't bring yourself to believe me.
Using a pair of compasses on a piece of paper where you copied or printed the above Balsamo picture on, will do exactly the same job.
As I also told Balsamo in my first email after he banned me.
Normally I do not bother with website owners who have a grunt against you for whatever reason (never happened to me ever before, btw, seems to me a
good indication of civil net etiquette used by me in my, as long as the Internet exists, online behavior), but this time I got really curious what the
real reason was behind his banning me, out of the blue.
And his sudden hostile behavior against me. While I explained to him in my post before he banned me, in a very civil manner, that I was not his enemy,
and that I posted my screenshot from the Fast (30 seconds
) Alignment Procedure advised by Boeing, the constructor of the 9/11 planes, to
counter eventual Official Story Followers opponents arguments at forehand.
These are the other two screenshots I took from the Boeing Manual regarding their 757-200 INS/IRS system, Internal Navigational System / Inertial
Reference System :
Do you really think that pilots, always in a hurry to not get sacked by their Airline bosses for huge financial losses connected to too many delayed
flights in their personal record, would not choose this 30 seconds
Fast Alignment Procedure offered by Boeing, instead of the normal 10 minutes
at lower latitude, but minimum 17 minutes at higher latitude, American Airlines procedure at the gates?
And yes, Dulles is situated at lat 77°, thus a minimum of 17 minutes is lost when, for whatever reason, the pilots are late.
And as long as the end of the former flight from the day before is not outside an 18 hours time frame, this is allowed by Boeing. And Flight 77
returned every day's evening from LAX as Flight 144, to the same IAD Gate D26 as it also always departed from and thus also arrived at. For many
years already, so all ground personnel knew by heart, where Flight 77 was parked at arrival and departure.
So, there are two HUGE discrepancies in that false FDR.
Arrival gate (D15) and departure gate (D18 or D20) are totally different from the normal gate, Gate D26.
That's a huge marker that some one in the Flight 77 FDR-falsification team did want us to find such a reasonable easy marker of tampering with
evidence of mass murder.
As depicted by Jan Zelman in his meticulously plotted zoom-in of the lat/long datapoints decoded by Warren Stutt.
Warren's datapoints decode, Farmer's decode, UnderTow's decode and the original decode by the NTSB who released it after years of FOIA pressure,
are all different from eachother in a manner of tens to hundred meters, BUT, all their overall taxiing and runway drawing total patterns are all
IDENTICAL, meaning that their alt/long positions decodes did differ a bit, but not the overall pattern. They were all shifted a bit different, but the
form of the plot is always the same.
Thus, I can safely say that my method is fool proof, while the Balsamo /TigerTrack method shows a fool, a clown in his own words, as he himself so
nicely addressed me in his last post on top of page 4 in the "9/11gate,"AA77" FDR numerology" thread at P49/11T American 77 forum.
SMILE, Balsamo. Learn to take some online punches. And be a man, and admit you were wrong. If not, you are in my books, what I suspect strongly that
you really are.