reply to post by shaq76
Well, I thought I did exactly that, more than 50 minutes before you posted this one-liner.
Condensed my OP in one short post for people with attention disorder ( half of the television viewers in the USA) or very little time at hand (you
should not interfere with complicated technical 9/11 threads in that case).
Did it cost you that much time to come up with a one-liner, and that's the reason you did not have the opportunity to read my last post above you?
Did you notice it after you posted?
Well, it seems there are no posters and readers who do not understand the methods used by me to give evidence of a doctored, falsified or totally
bogus "Flight 77" FDR.
No one asked to explain it in more detail, so, I'm glad I made it that clear.
And yes, to do exactly that, it needs a lot of my time and dedication.
Because I know every day new and fresh 9/11 doubters stream in, and they don't have the years long experience we have, we, the long time 9/11 ATS
forum members, and I do not want to loose them to the ever awake and present, nagging opposition. But at least they keep us on our toes.
Let's proceed with my so childishly cut off thread at P49/11T.
Anybody not agreeing that this falsified FDR means that nearly all arguments used by pilots in their forums are suddenly based on the quicksand of too
much trust in one or more false FDR's and thus also false radar data?
They throw around heaps of data, all extracted from that FALSE Flight 77 FDR. Like ridiculous airspeeds, they adhered to magically found additional 4
seconds on top of the full NTSB Flight 77 FDR decode, which is therefore also proved to be a certified mess.
This evidence of tampering with FDR's means that those pilots must rethink their online attitude, you must stop offering any data from that FDR as
the hard truth. You are back at our and CIT's area of expertise, the interpretation of witness statements, photos and videos. And find the
inconsistencies in all the material in our possession.
Of course you can also stop wondering, since the tampering by certified officials, with this FDR "evidence", can only mean that you are ready, now
we must find better ways to kick this and other hard evidence of the US government involved in mass murder on their own citizens, through a majority
of US and world citizens throats.
Anybody not understanding my viable flight path explanation?
Everybody has taken the time to read my 7 pages long thread I linked to, at P49/11T ? About impact or fly-over.
The one where I offered quite some new evidence to strengthen the CIT North of CITGO flightpath witness remarks, and added 6+ more NoC witnesses, who
were from day one on branded as SoC witnesses, but after meticulously studying their real words, they turn out to be solid NoC witnesses. And most of
them stood locked in traffic jam in the northwards leading POV-lanes, right in front of the Pentagon west wall, and very near or in front of the
Helipad there. And the plane crossed over their heads or just in front of their cars.
The attack plane crossed Route 27 where all these witnesses were situated, just between the Helipad and the diesel generator standing behind the
corner of the fence around the renovation contractors area.
Frank Probst, a manager of the renovation project, stood right in front of that fence's corner, on the walkway along the Route 27 safety rails. And
ducked to the ground because he was afraid to get hit by the right jet engine.
I now go listening again to Roosevelt Roberts his two (also transcribed) phone and audio interviews, to show to pilots member onesliceshort that
Roosevelt did went to the corner of the west wall, moving along the south wall to assist some wounded or shocked Pentagon personnel who fled out of
the building after the impact and following explosions and fires spreading.
And he asked me in my brute cut-off thread if I had not read the "official" transcribes of the Ranke/Marquis phone interview, where these CIT guys
base their use of Roosevelt Roberts as the only fly-over witness.
Well, that official transcribe was written by the same interviewers, Craig and Aldo, so, nothing official about that. I made my own transcribe, while
listening many times to the audios, and there are quite some discrepancies between my version and the CIT version.
Nevertheless, I am again going to waste some more time on listening to Roosevelt Roberts, driving in his car and not really concentrated on his
There, at the corner of the west wall with the south wall, Roosevelt saw the C-130 coming, as photographed from the bank of the Potomac River on the
opposite side of the Pentagon river bank, and video taped from inside moving cars around the Pentagon roads.
As said before, Search ATS with " LaBTop C-130 " (only the words).
Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis from CIT also made some trigonometric calculations a few years ago, while using those photos and videos, comparing them
with Google Earth aerial maps from the Pentagon grounds, and came to the conclusion that the C-130 did not follow the exact flight path in front of
the Pentagon as can be found in the RADES radar data, but kept much further away from the west wall as depicted in that radar data, if I remember that
right. They also interviewed and emailed the pilot from that C-130, and he strengthened their conclusion, they said, if I remember that also right.
Let's concentrate to start with, on Roosevelt Roberts, for a while.
Or does anybody has a good reason to not waste time again on his quite chaotic CIT interview and CMH testimony?
I made quite some work of his audios, see for that my "impact or fly-over" thread at the P49/11T Debate forum page 2.