It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subject x
I can't tell if this is about 9/11 or some forum feud.
Maybe I just need more coffee...
Originally posted by LaBTop
The best chance ever for us world citizens would be that a whistle blower would come very carefully forward and admits and proves with hard evidence that he was ordered to falsify that data. That would be the death sentence for many top brass traitors.
Originally posted by Observer99
... Longest post ever??
Seriously OP, if you actually believe there's a case to be made in there, condense it. And while you're condensing, remember this -- if you leave a single loophole for a debunker, he will cite it as such and dismiss everything you wrote. It's been almost 10 years since 9/11 and the general public is still asleep. Only way to change that is to find more absolutely airtight evidence, which simply cannot be questioned. If you can't condense this into 1 or 2 pages of unquestionable fact, then it's useless.
Originally posted by Jobeycool
These 9/11 conspiracies are ridiculous nonsense.I have heard every excuse possibly that it could be.Remote bombs,remote passnger jets,Bush admin behind it all,Israel did it,Planes that realy took off somehow dissapeared and the people on them are somewhere hiding ,Bombs planted in all the buildings and timed just right.
I mean come on people the world is in enough trouble with chaos to keep going to the insanely bizarre ridiculous conspiracies.UFO conspiracy has truth to it and some others.Maybe the U.S.new an attack was coming of some sort and because they fight over politics so much nothing got done to stop it.
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by LaBTop
How is this a 'Watergate'? The Watergate (as well as any new scandal that evokes it's name) is defined by being a fairly conclusive, and easy to understand by the public at large....something they can rally behind. The motives are always fairly clear in such a 'gate' scandal. It often involves someone or something getting 'caught in the act'.
What you have presented is an elaborate argument......And while it very well may be true, it lacks clear proof, as well as lacking a clear perpetrator of the crime. Was it the Government? Was it a rouge element of the C.I.A/F.B.I. ? Who knows...There is not even a clear cut link to the 9/11 hijacking....this could all be due to bad management of the airport screwing up the facts presented to the Government investigating 9/11. If this were presented in court I imagine there'd be a myriad of attempts at a rational explanation to these inconsistencies.
Honestly I'd say there is MUCH more conclusive evidence out there that 9/11 is the result of some sort of conspiracy. Evidence that would fit the bill of a 'Watergate' much better than the evidence presented here (though still even that evidence would fall a bit short of a 'gate' at this point IMHO)
I don't mean to offend you....but you calling this a 'Watergate' seems to have been done for no other reason than to sensationalize your own research.